1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Informal Poll on Mercury Engine in 1951 F1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-16-2015, 06:56 PM
ssg1957's Avatar
ssg1957
ssg1957 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Informal Poll on Mercury Engine in 1951 F1

I am having a Mercury spec engine with a mild cam being built for my Ford F1, I have the options of putting the Ford heads on and it will look Ford, or I can have the Mercury heads on it and have the wow factor when popping the hood open.


The truck is not a hot rod and will never be, it's just a fun driver.


Any thoughts?


Scott in Texas
 
  #2  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:03 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,802
Received 609 Likes on 379 Posts
8CM Merc heads have larger combustion chambers, resulting in the same compression ratio (a miserable 6.75:1) when used on the 255 Merc engine. Putting the Ford heads on increases CR to 7.3 when combined with a .030" bore. If you have Merc EAC heads (will be cast onto the heads) then there is no difference. The best stock heads are Ford EAB.
 
  #3  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:04 PM
49fordv8f4's Avatar
49fordv8f4
49fordv8f4 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: North Central Arkansas
Posts: 2,594
Received 69 Likes on 40 Posts
You will have more compression with the Ford heads.
Mark
 
  #4  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:06 PM
49fordv8f4's Avatar
49fordv8f4
49fordv8f4 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: North Central Arkansas
Posts: 2,594
Received 69 Likes on 40 Posts
Ross types faster tan me, he beat me by a minute.
Mark
 
  #5  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:06 PM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
GB SISSON is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 47 Posts
I will place my vote for the Mercury heads. They may even be higher compression. I have a mercury tailgate on my F350, because the bed came with it. I get more comments on that Merc tailgate than all the difficult modifications and rare features this truck has put together. BTW, you are gonna love that 4" stroke when you visit your old familiar hills in your home town.
 
  #6  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:08 PM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
GB SISSON is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 47 Posts
And you both beat me to my erroneous conclusion!
 
  #7  
Old 01-16-2015, 07:26 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,802
Received 609 Likes on 379 Posts
Scott, there are some simple things you can do for cheap with the heads (either ones) to really give your engine some snap. Not simple to describe, PM if you're interested.

BTW "r_reed" on here has a stroker motor with some other mods, check his posts to see how much he likes it!

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...r-is-done.html
 
  #8  
Old 01-17-2015, 12:06 AM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
8CM Merc heads have larger combustion chambers, resulting in the same compression ratio (a miserable 6.75:1) when used on the 255 Merc engine. Putting the Ford heads on increases CR to 7.3 when combined with a .030" bore. If you have Merc EAC heads (will be cast onto the heads) then there is no difference. The best stock heads are Ford EAB.
I agree with Ross the EAB ford heads should yield the higher compression.
I have a set of milled eab heads on my rebuilt ford engine but have yet to run it.

I have always thought ( and im not sure where i supposedly got this info) that the merc heads would yield a lower compression than a ford head but i think this is only if you ran a merc head on a ford motor, then you would end up with the lower compression? Hmm anyway.

I forget, are you having Roger install hard seats? If so i would run the 8CM merc heads if you do decide to go with merc heads. I just like the sound of 8CM vs EAC. Plus the EAC engines didnt have hard seats from the factory.

Im not really sure how the 8CM engines were rated at 110 hp but the EAC engines were 125hp if i remember correctly.

Cheers
Josh
 
  #9  
Old 01-17-2015, 08:43 AM
oldmerc's Avatar
oldmerc
oldmerc is offline
oldmerc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is cool to be a little different , but I am biased
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1952henry
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
50
11-08-2022 06:49 PM
big job
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
03-24-2014 02:42 AM
Kazoo
Flathead V8 & Flathead 6
3
10-17-2007 09:01 PM
propane32
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
06-20-2006 09:19 AM
Huggy Bear
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
3
01-15-2001 06:09 AM



Quick Reply: Informal Poll on Mercury Engine in 1951 F1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.