Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

Engine build! Suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
Fellenz's Avatar
Fellenz
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Engine build! Suggestions?

If anyone has read my recent threads, they will know I blew out a main cap in my '65 F100 with a 390. Well, turns out that not only did it put a hole in the oil pan, but punched the block out too..time for a new engine.
I have a spare block laying around that was the original 352 for the truck.

I'd like to see if its possible to save the 390 crank and have a machine shop bring it back to a usable condition. Id also like to try to save the rods.
So, my question is..what pistons should I be looking at for this engine? Crank and rods will be for a 390, and I'd like to make a 10.5-1 compression ratio or better.

Heads are c8ae-h fresh from the machine shop.

Right now my shopping list is as follows:
Pistons and rings
Bearings
crank ground and polished
oil pan
And all the other little things like timing set, gaskets etc..

I'm not building a million horsepower deal, as this will be on a budget, but I'd like to get the most bang for my buck, especially since I'm starting from a bare block.

Any advise from the wise?
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Becky_is_a_66's Avatar
Becky_is_a_66
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 860
Likes: 13
From: Asheville, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Stock 390 pistons from the mid to early 60s should give you about 9.25:1; unless you are upgrading in other areas that is all the compression you need.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 09:35 PM
  #3  
Fellenz's Avatar
Fellenz
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
I was reading in '68 they built a 390 with a 10.5-1 ratio...I can't seem to find out what pistons were used though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 09:46 PM
  #4  
Becky_is_a_66's Avatar
Becky_is_a_66
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 860
Likes: 13
From: Asheville, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
That is about right for some of the early performance versions; of course you were buying a more a-tuned fuel when they were in production. Even then you were supposed to fill with higher octane gas.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 09:57 PM
  #5  
Fellenz's Avatar
Fellenz
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
I've always filled with 91- no ethanol..it would be nice if I could get the most out of that fuel with the given cubic inches.
My mentality is, they did it 50 years ago, I should be able to do it today..with out going nuts with stroker kits and whatnot.

I'm having a hard time finding any pistons with less than a 100cc dish in them. I'm not completely on my A-game in this area, but what are the chances of finding a true flat top piston (as far as cc's are concerned) or even a dome style?
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 10:05 PM
  #6  
SuperSabre's Avatar
SuperSabre
Laughing Gas
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 14
From: Tucson, Arizona
I would think your machine shop/engine builder's measurements of your old 352 block would dictate the size pistons you can use. Remember the stock bore on the 352 was 4.00 inches. The 360 and 390 bore was 4.05 - 50 thousandths over stock 352. Some blocks can tolerate that much overbore, some can't. It may have been overbored already - you didn't say or don't know. There was a 401 horse 390 offered by the factory in '61 and '62, but it had solid lifters, 11:1 compression, three deuces, special heads, special exhaust manifolds. There was also a 360 horse 352 in 1960. Good luck finding those parts at affordable prices. Remember, when those engines were available, so was 100 octane leaded gas for cheap. Your engine builder can massage your compression ratio to whatever you want, just remember that what passes for gasoline today would have been called cow **** back in the 60s. Good luck with whatever you do.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 10:09 PM
  #7  
1972RedNeck's Avatar
1972RedNeck
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,522
Likes: 11
From: Townsend, MT
My 416 is around 9.3:1. I have the timing at 12* and it will detonate if I don't run 91 octane.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 10:30 PM
  #8  
Fellenz's Avatar
Fellenz
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
I appreciate the input..all good stuff.

Speaking of overbore Supersabre, I've always been curious what dictates the amount of bore these old blocks can take. Whats stopping me from boring it out to a 428 for example? Just curiousity at this point. Eagle specialty products sells a stroker kit that requires a 4.160 bore, but displaces 462CI.
One can always dream..
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 10:38 PM
  #9  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Fellenz
I was reading in '68 they built a 390 with a 10.5-1 ratio...I can't seem to find out what pistons were used though.

Nominal or advertised 9.5 "Regular Fuel" 390 2bbl used a slight dish with valve reliefs.

10.5 used a flat top with valve reliefs. Piston to deck was .015 or so for both. Specs on '60s motors here:

FE Series Engine Specification Chart

Page 43 or so shows the 390. You will be looking at a compression height of 1.76. They also show pistons with a 1.66 compression height. Those are actually 410 car motor pistons, which yielded 10.5 on top of the long stroke of the 410. In a 390, they end up down the hole with low compression for pickups motors.

https://www.uempistons.com/catalogs/...te_catalog.pdf
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 11:10 PM
  #10  
tbm3fan's Avatar
tbm3fan
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 91
From: Concord, CA
Originally Posted by Fellenz
I appreciate the input..all good stuff.

Speaking of overbore Supersabre, I've always been curious what dictates the amount of bore these old blocks can take. Whats stopping me from boring it out to a 428 for example? Just curiousity at this point. Eagle specialty products sells a stroker kit that requires a 4.160 bore, but displaces 462CI.
One can always dream..
The first thing that might stop you is trying to find a piston larger than 0.060" and your example would need a 0.160". I'd be curious what the extra weight of that larger piston would do to the rotating assembly.

Second, Ford recommends no more than 0.060". To go beyond that would require sonic checking to be safe. A too thin cylinder will lead to an engine running hot, possibly very hot.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2014 | 11:20 PM
  #11  
The Masked Rider's Avatar
The Masked Rider
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 8
O YES,,, the good ol days when fuel was fuel. Remember Conoco gas stations with their 'dial an octane' wheel on the pump. Big silver **** - just turn it to the octane you wanted. They all went up to 100 octane but some of them, at least some of them in Albuquerque, had 120 octane. Hotrod heaven. You can only get good fuel like that at your local small airports. At least in large quantity. AND you will PAY.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 09:32 AM
  #12  
Fellenz's Avatar
Fellenz
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tbm3fan
The first thing that might stop you is trying to find a piston larger than 0.060" and your example would need a 0.160". I'd be curious what the extra weight of that larger piston would do to the rotating assembly.

Second, Ford recommends no more than 0.060". To go beyond that would require sonic checking to be safe. A too thin cylinder will lead to an engine running hot, possibly very hot.
understand what your, saying..makes sense in my head.
However, what seperates a 352 block from a 428 block? I thought all the blocks were pretty much the same.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 10:28 AM
  #13  
Old Rusty's Avatar
Old Rusty
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 112
Likes: 1
From: Yelm, WA
Why don't you just drop in a 460? I have one in mine; it bolts right in using 70s motor mounts and would be a whole lot cheaper than messing around with a FE block. Getting the right piston, rod and crank setup can be problematic.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
tbm3fan's Avatar
tbm3fan
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 91
From: Concord, CA
Originally Posted by Fellenz
understand what your, saying..makes sense in my head.
However, what seperates a 352 block from a 428 block? I thought all the blocks were pretty much the same.
The blocks are pretty much the same only the 428 was designed with the bigger bore and piston. You can bore out the 352 0.0130" but you will not find any pistons for it in that oversize. Now if you went 0.160" over, a bigger risk, you can find a set in that size. Forged of course and around $100 each.

As Old Rusty said if you really want power for less bucks then put the 460 in. One can build the Ford FE like I did taking a 360 to a 390 which is easy. Can you take a 352 to a 428? Possibly, but as most FE guys know the Ford engine isn't cheap when it comes to that sort of thing. You can do it but is your budget large enough?

Funny thing to me is every one wants more horse power out of their Slick. Then I look at my truck with it's older designed suspension, manual steering and manual brakes and go you gotta be nuts. I'm not taking this thing to the track for a 1/4 mile run and on the street if I got going fast then everybody in front of me better look out. So I opted for torque and the ability to cruise between 45-65 in style...
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2014 | 11:13 AM
  #15  
1964FORDTUF's Avatar
1964FORDTUF
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 713
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by The Masked Rider
O YES,,, the good ol days when fuel was fuel. Remember Conoco gas stations with their 'dial an octane' wheel on the pump. Big silver **** - just turn it to the octane you wanted. They all went up to 100 octane but some of them, at least some of them in Albuquerque, had 120 octane. Hotrod heaven. You can only get good fuel like that at your local small airports. At least in large quantity. AND you will PAY.
Ha ha ha I was waiting to see if anyone else would mention what "real" high octane was - not to mention it was leaded fuel. In the 60's, engines were built with 10:1 and even up to 11.25:1 compression in some 396 and 427 chevy engines if I recall correctly. It wasn't an issue with he fuel that was around then. My Dad had a bone stock 71 Mach1 351C with 10.25:1 (last of the power era) and by 1978 / 79, we couldn't get 102 Octane fuel for it. We had to back off the timing on it to stop the run-on and pinging. Todays HP engines are all top end, lower compression engines. Superchargers, Turbochargers, etc. You just don't get that Big Block stomp on it G-force pushed back in the seat power anymore. If you wish to drive the truck on the street without a lot of headache, stay away from the higher compression...my $.02
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE