When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I understand that I would need to use the earlier rod to have the right pin diameter or re-bush later rods. Fine there. The compression distance is also very close to the 300's. Fine there too. Then I used Summit's compression calculator with the felpro gasket compressed thickness of .035 and a zero deck with both 68cc (240 head) and 76cc (300 head) chambers. I was surprised to come up with about 9.3 and 8.5 to 1 compression ratios respectively. Anyone object to the accuracy of my findings? If this is so, I think there should finally be a piston sticky. There's so much talk about 351, 352, and 390 pistons with so many combinations, but I haven't really seen a nice guide through this mess. Anyone interested in helping me tackle this?
You are correct. I made a mistake and used the incorrect stroke. I'm thinking that a little unshrouding and cleanup of the 76cc head will yield at least a couple more cc's bringing it down to about 9.3.
Why zero deck and then later make the combustion chamber larger? With that setup, you have a 0.028" deck clearance. If you're zero decking to get better quench, you should use a Fel-Pro 1024 head gasket, which not only is a better overall gasket but has a compressed thickness of 0.039", a lot closer to the ideal 0.040" quench distance. This will also give you a slightly smaller combustion ratio.
Question. Why do you want that piston? The Probe P2446F with a 15.9cc dish might be a better choice. I'm using the Probe 11938 in mine with a 20.1cc dish, but it belongs to the SRS series which is more expensive.
I was concerned with the broad dish area of the probe adversely affecting quench. If you look at the Speed Pro, it has a smaller, but deeper dish area. I'm guessing that would create a smaller burn distance lending to less possibility of detonation?
Thanks for the details. I get it now. There really needs to be a solid piston sticky because there are way too many threads about 390 or 352 pistons. This is a simple, straight forward way to use a forged piston with a ton of off-the-shelf choices to be had. My goal ultimate goal is boost, but I'll cross that road when I get there.
Hey Bigfootsurfin, Take a look at Trozei's thread. He and I actually discussed just what you are lookin to do. I am useing the TRW L2446F-30. The only difference over stock 300 pistons is that they are .012" taller compression height. https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ine-build.html
Thanks for the details. I get it now. There really needs to be a solid piston sticky because there are way too many threads about 390 or 352 pistons. This is a simple, straight forward way to use a forged piston with a ton of off-the-shelf choices to be had. My goal ultimate goal is boost, but I'll cross that road when I get there.
I would love to see a piston "sticky" thread; been trying to put one together w/o much success.
Question: why are you using a forged piston? Hypereutectic are cheaper and good quality if not using forced induction.