1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ouch 2016 burned down

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-04-2014, 11:04 AM
2006powerstroke90's Avatar
2006powerstroke90
2006powerstroke90 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
  #2  
Old 08-04-2014, 01:15 PM
Kdr358's Avatar
Kdr358
Kdr358 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West of Chicago
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well back to the drawing board!
 
  #3  
Old 08-04-2014, 01:23 PM
texastech_diesel's Avatar
texastech_diesel
texastech_diesel is offline
Token Redneck

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Breckenridge, TX
Posts: 9,089
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2014/08...ches-fire.html

"The fire also appears to end any debate about whether a large portion of the body would be made from aluminum or steel. The forgotten blobs of melted aluminum left on the side of the road are easy to see. The only major recognizable parts of the truck that remained were the frame and engine block."


 
  #4  
Old 08-04-2014, 02:14 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,257
Received 1,576 Likes on 1,054 Posts
While a blaze that bad never happened to me, I did have fires on test vehicles. They were small and I was able to put them out without much damage.

Test vehicles have many temperature, flow, and pressure sensors installed. These will be in fuel, coolant, and oil lines. A failed test sensor can spray hot, flammable fluid throughout the engine compartment. This has nothing to do with a production vehicle, it is a hazard of modifying a vehicle to be able to measure what engineers need to know to develop the product.

I would not be at all concerned about a fire on a test vehicle. That doesn't mean the production vehicles are susceptible to fires.
 
  #5  
Old 08-04-2014, 06:20 PM
cattlerancher's Avatar
cattlerancher
cattlerancher is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would they not carry a fire extinguisher
 
  #6  
Old 08-04-2014, 07:13 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Screw the fire extinguisher. I'd carry hotdogs, marshmallows, graham crackers and chocolate bars. Plus plenty of beverages of course. Enough fire there to eat good for half the day.

Honestly I think GM got ahold of that truck. You know how the GMs like to catch fire.
 
  #7  
Old 08-04-2014, 07:18 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,257
Received 1,576 Likes on 1,054 Posts
Originally Posted by cattlerancher
Why would they not carry a fire extinguisher
All prototypes have a fire extinguisher. It's not going to do much good if there is a large fuel leak.
 
  #8  
Old 08-04-2014, 09:01 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,449
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by cattlerancher
Why would they not carry a fire extinguisher
They probably did. But my guess is most people had the "oh well" mentality once it got going.

Most fire extinguishers are enough to handle a small fire, not a car fire, and most car fires are under the hood and undiscovered until its well past extinguishing with out Fire Dept assistance.
 
  #9  
Old 08-05-2014, 09:09 AM
Denola's Avatar
Denola
Denola is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's look at the Pros of the aluminum body---with a meltdown like this--the clean up will be a lot easier, when it all melts together in one pile.
 
  #10  
Old 08-05-2014, 09:20 AM
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Snowseeker is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 13,471
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Must still be using the same brake pressure switch since 1988...
 
  #11  
Old 08-05-2014, 10:56 AM
droldsmorland's Avatar
droldsmorland
droldsmorland is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Land of Taxes
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Snowseeker
Must still be using the same brake pressure switch since 1988...
And foam in the rear wheel wells!
 
  #12  
Old 08-05-2014, 12:14 PM
Y2KW57's Avatar
Y2KW57
Y2KW57 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,677
Received 3,342 Likes on 1,750 Posts
Originally Posted by cattlerancher
Why would they not carry a fire extinguisher
A hand held fire extinguisher?

When the eye witness states it took less then 3 minutes for the fire to go from this:




to this:





And only 21 minutes to devolve from Purr:





To Poof:




Note the fire extinguisher in the picture. Unscathed, like the vehicle occupants, one of whom probably had it in hand as he escaped, and then tossed it on the pile of powder to be hauled away. If the extinguisher were still good and not expended, it probably would have been kept, if by no one else than a passerby or the tow truck driver (or in this case the road clean up crew, as there was no vehicle remaining to "tow").



Originally Posted by A/Ox4
They probably did. But my guess is most people had the "oh well" mentality once it got going.

Most fire extinguishers are enough to handle a small fire, not a car fire, and most car fires are under the hood and undiscovered until its well past extinguishing with out Fire Dept assistance.

"oh well"? more like "oh HELL!" Imagine the heat emanating from that fire! Without a fire suit, it would be difficult to get near it. And while that extinguisher, which was clearly there, and clearly in the hands of someone, not in the vehicle itself, may have been expended... it would be likely have the same efficacy as a toy squirt gun.

If you haven't seen all the pics (clearly some haven't, else there wouldn't be any question about the fire extinguisher), google Chris Doane LLC, the automotive paparazzi that shot them. Probably the most terrific spy shot vehicle fire photos ever taken to date.
 
  #13  
Old 08-05-2014, 12:56 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,449
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Denola
Let's look at the Pros of the aluminum body---with a meltdown like this--the clean up will be a lot easier, when it all melts together in one pile.
I have several puddles of aluminum in my garage from vehicle fires

Note: none of my vehicles caught fire. I collected the puddles lol
 
  #14  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:22 PM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,076
Received 1,561 Likes on 909 Posts
Those are like the most realistic flames I have ever seen painted on a truck................
 
  #15  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:57 PM
Misky6.0's Avatar
Misky6.0
Misky6.0 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ouray, CO
Posts: 5,419
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Denola
Let's look at the Pros of the aluminum body---with a meltdown like this--the clean up will be a lot easier, when it all melts together in one pile.
Lol, just need a wet/dry shop vac and 120v.

Oddly, does this mean low life people will cut off pieces of panels to take to the recycling center with their cans?

Sent from my Sprint PC36100 using IB AutoGroup
 


Quick Reply: Ouch 2016 burned down



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.