When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
every part on the assembly has some degree of rust , I need to fully disassemble it to have the parts cleaned , stripped and replated . The plastic handle is in great shape and I do not want to ruin it getting it off . Also the rod 2790 will not come out because of part 2859 ( pressed in or screwed in ? ) . The cable has been taken off ... that was the easy part
From what I can tell, it's very similar to the e-brake handle on a 54 Ford.
Here's a link to a tech thread I wrote for the 54 Ford Club showing how to remove/disassemble the e-brake handle.
The parts are obviously not the same, but the basic way that they both work seems to be the same with the little spring-loaded catch and the serrated main shaft.
From what I can tell, it's very similar to the e-brake handle on a 54 (1952/56) Ford Passenger Car.
Here's a link to a tech thread I wrote for the 54 Ford Club showing how to remove/disassemble the e-brake handle.
The parts are obviously not the same, but the basic way that they both work seems to be the same with the little spring-loaded catch and the serrated main shaft.
The parking pawl (OM-2786), parking pawl locking spring (OM-2788) and the parking brake lever pin (OM-2859) are the same, nothing else is.
The 1952/56 parking brake handle and shaft were only furnished with the complete assembly.
These parts could be purchased individually or with the complete assembly on 1961/66 F100/250's.
I still see no reason to remove the plastic handle from the shaft. Plus I doubt y'all be able to do so...without breaking it. Once the 2819 pin is pressed in, I doubt it can be removed.
OK Numberdummy....you can put the little question mark frowny faces in my comments if you want and restate the obvious, but it's completely clear that I was simply offering up something that I thought might help in a small way.
That's all...nothing more.
I think TxStang (and probably the rest of us) are big boys and girls and can figure out basic things like inhaling oxygen, exhaling carbon dioxide and recognizing that a 54 Ford car is not a 66 Ford truck.
OK Numberdummy....you can put the little question mark frowny faces in my comments if you want and restate the obvious, but it's completely clear that I was simply offering up something that I thought might help in a small way.
That's all...nothing more.
I think TxStang (and probably the rest of us) are big boys and girls and can figure out basic things like inhaling oxygen, exhaling carbon dioxide and recognizing that a 54 Ford car is not a 66 Ford truck.
I did not knock your article, but...if I hadn't chimed in, car & truck people would not have known that the 3 parts are the same and two of these parts, the pawl and the spring are usually what fail.
You did not say it was a car, all you said was 1954 Ford. 'Course if people clicked on the link, they would have found this out.
And...if you had the 1949/59 Ford Passenger Car Parts Catalog, you would have known the parts are the same 1952/56, plus these 3 parts were also used on 1950/51 Ford cars.
No need to get defensive guys , I do appreciate both of your help on this . I worked at a Ford dealer for 17 years but this old truck was built the same year I was born and nothing this old ever came into the service dept. I don't think the dealership even had books or microfiche for this old a vehicle . I do feel its better to ask a stupid question and get opinions and advice from others than to try the gorilla tactic and break things .
The truck is fully disassembled accept for this stupid E brake because I didn't want to break the parking brake lever pin (OM-2859) taking it out not knowing if it screwed in or was a press fit .
I did not knock your article, but...if I hadn't chimed in, car & truck people would not have known that the 3 parts are the same and two of these parts, the pawl and the spring are usually what fail.
You did not say it was a car, all you said was 1954 Ford. 'Course if people clicked on the link, they would have found this out.
And...if you had the 1949/59 Ford Passenger Car Parts Catalog, you would have known the parts are the same 1952/56, plus these 3 parts were also used on 1950/51 Ford cars.
That's fine. I understand.
And, in spite of your sometimes slightly abrasive style of communication, I sincerely appreciate all the assistance you provide, totally free of charge, to this forum.
knowing that and looking at a hole directly across from it I will attempt a light pressure on the arbor press from the opposite side and see if it will budge ...... no "gorilla force" will be included . If it doesn't want to come out I will just leave it as is and see if they can electoplate it while together .
knowing that and looking at a hole directly across from it I will attempt a light pressure on the arbor press from the opposite side and see if it will budge ...... no "gorilla force" will be included . If it doesn't want to come out I will just leave it as is and see if they can electoplate it while together .
Did you get the pin out? I was at this point last night and decided I wanted to detail mine. Obviously far easier if it is apart. So, I lined up the hole with the backside of the pin like you noticed and used a pin punch to tap it out. Only took two light taps and out it came.
The pin (C0DZ-2819-A) I'm referring to is the one that retains the plastic e-brake handle (C1TZ-2760-A) onto the shaft, what the OP asked about in post 1.
This pin is obsolete, so is the handle, neither are reproduced. In post 2, I asked the OP why he wanted to remove this handle from the shaft.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.