Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

HP & Torque?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #1  
dresden78's Avatar
dresden78
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
HP & Torque?

I have a stock 1978 f250 custom 4x4 with a 351m/400 in it. i want to know, what should my HP at the wheels be and how much torque am i producing? anyone with accurate info please share
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
61steven's Avatar
61steven
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 685
Likes: 2
is it a 351m OR a 400?
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 01:58 PM
  #3  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by Mil1ion
Did this work ?

Model Year
Engine ......Horsepower @ RPM
(SAE net, except '71)
Torque (ft/lbs)..... @ RPM

1971* .....400 (car only)
.......260 @ 4400

1972.......400 (car only)
.........172 @ 4000..........298 @ 2200

1973.......400 (car only)
....171 @ 4000

1974......400 (car only)
170 @ 4000

1975.......351M (car only)
148 @ 3400

1975......400 (car only)
158 @ 3800

1976.......351M (car only)
152 @ 3400

1976........400 (car only)
180 @ 3800

1977.....351M (car/truck)
161 @ 3400

1977......400 (car/truck)
173 @ 3800 / 158 @ 3800

1978.....351M (car/truck)
152 @ 3400 / 156 @ 4000
Torque — / 262 @ 2000

1978......400 (car/truck)
160 @ 3800 / 158 @ 3800
Torque — / 276 @ 2000

1979.....351M (car/truck)
151 @ 3400 / 156 @ 4000
Torque 262 @ 2000

1979.......400 (car/truck)
159 @ 3800 / 159 @ 3800
Torque 276 @ 2000

Remember, you'll loose about 20% of these numbers at the rear wheels
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
turbohunter's Avatar
turbohunter
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,656
Likes: 4
From: Northern and Southern Cal
Club FTE Gold Member
Can you be more specific?
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 02:07 PM
  #5  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by turbohunter
Can you be more specific?
Ok.....well maybe 15 - 20% loss at the rear wheels...depending on the health of the drivetrain.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2014 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
61steven's Avatar
61steven
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 685
Likes: 2
Also parasitic loss from the engine being as old as it is. 1978 is not "fresh off the shop floor".
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #7  
dresden78's Avatar
dresden78
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
it is a 351 modified to 400 with a 2 barrel motor-craft carburetor manifolds with duel exhaust out the side just in front of the rear wheels i have 33in tires with 16.5 rims. i hope this is specific enough because i want to know how heavy of a load i can haul with this truck i know my grandpa used to use it to haul a steer in the bed but a steer doesn't way as much as a truck would on a trailer
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
From: town of less than 200 ppl
A 351m and a 400 are two different engine displacements, thus they are 2 different engines.. Your truck will pull a vehicle on a car trailer no problems, assuming it is healthy and running good, regardless of engine displacement. I wouldn't be worried.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 08:16 PM
  #9  
1972RedNeck's Avatar
1972RedNeck
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,522
Likes: 11
From: Townsend, MT
Since you have low range, I think you could pull over 40,000 lbs. with ease. You just can't go to fast.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 09:27 PM
  #10  
PA74F250's Avatar
PA74F250
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 8
From: York, Pa
^^^ what the heck 40,000lb with a single wheel 3/4 ton? He'll kill someone for sure.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2014 | 12:05 PM
  #11  
dresden78's Avatar
dresden78
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
A 351m is an engine built by ford using parts from both the 351c and the 400 engines the m stands for modified because they took the 351 block and Modified it to 400

"The engineers at Ford took the basic 351C block and modified it to power a whole new generation of environmentally-friendly cars and trucks. To start, Ford changed the transmission bell-housing pattern to match that of the larger 429/460 engines. This would allow Ford to continue putting the larger, heavy-duty 460 C6 transmissions with the new 400 engines. Ford also enlarged the main journal diameter from 2.75 inches to 3.0 inches allowing for a greater bearing wear area. The crankshaft stroke was also increased from 3.5 inches to 4.0 inches for a 50 cubic inch increase in engine displacement and greater low-end torque. Finally, the deck height was increased 1.09 inches in order to accommodate the 400s larger stroke. Consequently, the intake manifold had to be widened approximately one inch to accommodate the new deck height. The rest of the engine remained virtually the same. In fact all of the 351C valve train components (except for the pushrods) interchange with 351M/ 400 engines. The 351M/400 cylinder heads will also interchange with the 351C 2brl heads, although the 351M/400 heads have 78.4cc combustions chamber where as the 351C 2V heads had a 76.2cc combustions chamber.To develop the 351M, Ford simply shortened the “throw” of the 400’s crankshaft to the original 3.5 inches used in the 351C. The larger 3.0 inch journal diameter of the 400 was retained in the 351M. To accommodate the shorter stroke, the compression height of the 400’s pistons had to be enlarged to raise the compression ratio up to 8.0:1. So, other than the crankshaft and pistons, the 351M is exactly the same as the 400 "
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2014 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
dresden78's Avatar
dresden78
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
also im not planning on hauling 40,000lbs any time soon the truck is our farm truck and i want to know if it would be safe and worth it to put a goose neck hitch on it to haul our horses
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2014 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
PA74F250's Avatar
PA74F250
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 8
From: York, Pa
You could most certainly put a gooseneck hitch on it to pull your horses. The truck will handle it just don't expect to go over any hills fast it will be a little gutless. Other than the lack of power its still a capable truck.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
amodel55
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Aug 9, 2011 08:19 PM
Roger_56
1997 - 2003 F150
4
Apr 9, 2006 12:27 AM
fordeverpower
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
36
Feb 22, 2004 09:08 AM
Blue89F150
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
14
Jan 18, 2004 01:04 PM
ferguson777
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
Aug 18, 2003 06:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE