Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

302 Cam Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
Izzie1701's Avatar
Izzie1701
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
302 Cam Question

Trying to pick a cam out but there are way to many choices. I have a question about the blocks from year to year. My decision is greatly narrowed down at summit racing when I select a 1996 engine. Is there a difference in cams from year to year. Before 1996 I have a lot more choices. I know in 96 the 302 went to roller lifters so would this be the reason or is there something else I am missing. What is everyone else using for cams in there 302's. I am running the GT 40 heads and don't want to have to make many changes to the valves/springs.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
carnut122's Avatar
carnut122
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 1
From: Waleska, GA
Originally Posted by Izzie1701
Trying to pick a cam out but there are way to many choices. I have a question about the blocks from year to year. My decision is greatly narrowed down at summit racing when I select a 1996 engine. Is there a difference in cams from year to year. Before 1996 I have a lot more choices. I know in 96 the 302 went to roller lifters so would this be the reason or is there something else I am missing. What is everyone else using for cams in there 302's. I am running the GT 40 heads and don't want to have to make many changes to the valves/springs.
I suspect it's not a roller lifter issue, but the fact that Ford stopped using the 5.0 in everything except trucks(including SUV's) in 96. Everything else started using the 4.6 modular motor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2014 | 11:27 PM
  #3  
TireDood's Avatar
TireDood
Tuned
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 302
Likes: 17
I have a roller cam block in my Mustang. Either the B303 or E303 will work without any problems. I have the E303 in mine with GT40P heads. ALWAYS check piston-to-valve clearance, but you should not have any problems... It would be a good idea to upgrade your valve springs also. Trick Flow makes a good set for around $150. The stock springs on the GT40 heads cannot handle the lift of any cam other than stock.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
ryans88gt's Avatar
ryans88gt
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Yep. The mustang stopped using the 5.0 in 96. The explorer motors after that had a weak spring package and the standard 5.0 cam was about the largest upgrade that worked without a valve train upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 04:08 PM
  #5  
Wayne Waldrep's Avatar
Wayne Waldrep
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, AL (NO internet)
Originally Posted by Izzie1701
I know in 96 the 302 went to roller lifters
302 had roller lifters WAYYY before '96
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2014 | 05:03 PM
  #6  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,155
Likes: 4,754
From: Burbank, WA
Yeah, 302 roller cam was introduced in '85 in the HO Mustang. A few years later they were all roller.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 12:12 PM
  #7  
Izzie1701's Avatar
Izzie1701
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Thanks for all the replies. From all the post I have read now it seems I was incorrect in the year they went to roller lifters. Summit racing is also saying that the B303 and E303 is only compatible with engines before 1996. In saying this Tire Dood is running these in a 1996 engine with no issues. Could this just be a glitch in there website or is there something I need to look out for in the 96 engine that has changed since 95?

Looks like I will be changing the springs out though to accommodate a new cam no matter which one I choose. For the low price that they are (and finally something that ships cheap to Canada) I think it will be a must have upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #8  
TireDood's Avatar
TireDood
Tuned
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 302
Likes: 17
My engine is an 88 or 89, but the only problem would be piston-to-valve clearance. The 96 model 302 should be the same as all the others. Make sure that your PTV clearance is good and you won't have any problems. A 302 is a 302, the only differences are in the internal parts. Pistons, gaskets, etc. probably just a glitch in their website.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 9, 2014 | 01:13 PM
  #9  
Giesterfarher™'s Avatar
Giesterfarher™
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, California
If I remember correctly, if your engine is pre 85, then you can still use the 85 up roller cam, but you will need the retro fit style roller lifters with the link bars on the rollers. Much the same way a Chevy block before 86 would.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
80' ford man55
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
11
Apr 8, 2024 11:58 PM
My4Fordtrucks
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
49
Nov 6, 2017 07:59 AM
jaye
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
Sep 26, 2011 03:08 AM
craigibc
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
Feb 5, 2010 06:50 AM
marioc956
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
10
Sep 30, 2006 10:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE