Ford and Navistar settle up
Brian
MAGNUSON MOSS WARRANTY ACT
US Code - Title 15, Chapter 50, Sections 2301-2312
Legally, a vehicle manufacturer cannot void the warranty on a vehicle due to an aftermarket part unless they can prove that the aftermarket part caused or contributed to the failure in the vehicle (per the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)) . If your vehicle manufacturer fails to honor emission/warranty claims, contact EPA at (202) 260-2080 or www.epa.gov. If federal warranty protection is denied, contact the FTC at (202) 326-3128 or www.ftc.gov.
The first 2 I feel pretty good that they take top spots the Others IDK
Oil Cooler what Leads to EGR Cooler Failure and Blown heads
HPO Systems
FICM
Injectors Fuel Issues
Turbo
Alternators
Josh do you Really want throw 2003 6.0L Under the Bus so Fast??
How would you Rate the Most common cause of Fail?? What order would you think??
Trust me I have thought about having a Poll but I don't know how to Weed out the Folks that had Parts thrown at there Trucks
Don't hear of that with 2005+ 6.0 engines do you?
I feel the biggest issue with the early roll-out of the 6.0 was the PCM/FICM software.
Bad HPOPs.
Bad lifters.
Each engine release has it's pros and cons, however the strange reputation the 6.0 has to this day occurred with the 2003 engine and carried over with each revision.
Josh
Im Not debating why they were Sued neccserily
More just to the Point why a 2003 is Being singled out
But that's Crazy to think 1 year 2003 Cause all the Heartache

I don't mean Catastropic Failures Specific
I mean just the Most Common Cause of Breakdowns Across the Board (ALL YEARS)
I Agree with that
IMO some Upgrades that were Introduced as time went by were Worse or at least seems like they Solved one problem but created other problems
And in other areas Some changes redesigned the parts But the Original Flaw was still there and Problem Remained
Aftermarket Part Dealers are making Lots of Money because of this
In theory they should have got better 06-07 should have been the Best Stock
Don't hear of that with 2005+ 6.0 engines do you?
I feel the biggest issue with the early roll-out of the 6.0 was the PCM/FICM software.
Bad HPOPs.
Bad lifters.
Each engine release has it's pros and cons, however the strange reputation the 6.0 has to this day occurred with the 2003 engine and carried over with each revision.
Josh
Then add in the # of "diesel shops" that STILL don't understand the 6.0 (just look at the # of mistakes in the "rescue" thread involving run6.0run) so back in the 2003/2004 nobody had it figured out yet, vs. today where SOME understand it very well.
Then add in the # of "diesel shops" that STILL don't understand the 6.0 (just look at the # of mistakes in the "rescue" thread involving run6.0run) so back in the 2003/2004 nobody had it figured out yet, vs. today where SOME understand it very well.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post13670516
Josh
MAGNUSON MOSS WARRANTY ACT
US Code - Title 15, Chapter 50, Sections 2301-2312
Legally, a vehicle manufacturer cannot void the warranty on a vehicle due to an aftermarket part unless they can prove that the aftermarket part caused or contributed to the failure in the vehicle (per the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)) . If your vehicle manufacturer fails to honor emission/warranty claims, contact EPA at (202) 260-2080 or www.epa.gov. If federal warranty protection is denied, contact the FTC at (202) 326-3128 or www.ftc.gov.
So GM was doing everything they could, including not allowing you to bring your truck in with a load to show that it puked if it was warm out, had a load and went up a mild grade. If someone was able to go thru the hoops and the dealer agreed, they would have a regional rep come out to verify the symptom (a 2nd "test" required). This was back in '06, we had an '05 LLY.
Ford was having it's problems but was far more liberal in fixing 6.0s back then than GM was on it's major mistake. We got tired of the hassle and not being able to go anywhere or do anything with the truck so traded the POS in on our current '07 Ford. Depending on the dealer (well only the one closest to us is crap), we've had excellent response to concerns about the EGR cooler, fixing a bedplate and other oil leaks right up to the end of warranty. In fact, Ford rolled out their 5 year/60k mile warranty in '06 that even eliminated the $100 deductible.
Between those experiences and seeing how Ford got smarter during the bust we just went through and never took federal money (or took the bankruptcy out either). I'm gonna' stick with them for some time.
Sorry, a bit of a soapbox there -- it comes out of me whenever I think about GM or our Dmax
A Huge Factor SO Big that it Demands The most Common cause of Failure throughout ALL Years Be Determined Before the 2003 or any year for that matter Gets throw under the Bus Immediately like some have Done
Id say with How many times this EGR and Oil Cooler thing has come up in Not only this Thread But Many Many other threads and posts, I would give it the #1 Spot for the Most common point of Fail
Josh I get the Feeling you already know where Im going with this
If folks look at it like the Coil Spring front end and Grills looked better and Electronic climate control That Stuff is Nice I would like SOME of it even but you wont be sitting on the side of the road waiting for a Tow over it
Once you look at it from the point of view of the Most common causes of Fail [NO GO] little bit of a Game changer IMO
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
But since they took that Federal Money I wont spend another Dime on a new car or any auto from GM
I traded it when the rear axle seals went and I lost brakes on an exit ramp off the freeway, luckily I'd practiced using the E-brake to stop before then..
Luckily, there was a tire shop one block from my office and they fixed the rear seals for $450 and I bought my Excursion the following weekend (3 years ago)
It did serve me well, but I spent more in repairs on that Tahoe than it COST to buy (I bought it new). My Ex even with ALL the 6L engine upgrades, is still FAR below the costs for that Tahoe.
My one car a Berretta struggled with Lower intake manifold leaking but it made it 225K before that
I do get the feeling they struggled with Bigger trucks and SUV
Mine just made it to 200K basically problem free so I feel I got my Money out of it
either way, I much prefer my Ex over the other brand.
Now, just because Misky brought up the Tahoe and made me smile: we bought a '98 Tahoe new -- had some electrical issues, but it was ok OTHER than... It lost a rear axle seal (wets brake shoes) and braking wasn't just cut in half it was like a third was left -- I asled them to replace the other side proactively and they wouldn't (we towed a 4k lb horse trailer, Tahoe was rated for 7k). The good part: We had a steep driveway and we'd turn around at the top and back the trailer down to where we parked the trailer. Wife comes home from a ride and I'm at the top of the driveway chatting with next-door neighbor. She's backing down and damn near loses control, but has the smarts to throw it into drive. The Tahoe's windows are closed and we can hear her screaming an endless stream of obscenities to which the neighbor remarks: "she sounds upset" (ya' think?!") -- then she gets out of the Tahoe and yells up to me SELL this &(&*^&& and get me a REAL Truck!!! Yep, another axle seal...
As I recall, she didn't really like the looks of the Expedition is why we didn't consider one, but being the stupid husband I said something like: you know it's too bad you didn't like the Expeditions, because they are on a heavier chassis with stouter components including 4 wheel disc brakes.













Don't talk to a crazy upset woman that way, ever, is my advice to you all

We had an Expedition in a week and she loves it and it tows a far heavier trailer to boot.
The Dmax was THE final straw. Interesting watching GM do a complete clean-sheet design of the Chevy Volt. Didn't need no stinkin' help, let's just run this company into the ground (Ford licensed Toyota technology). The whole upper management should have been fired for that and the bankruptcy/bailout. idiots.
I'm needing
or two or four now...
Seems there lots of folks that feel that way about GM now they got the Bailout. Im done with them and Dodge is out the question. The Bailout may saved them temporary but they must be Losing sales over it, theres got to be a ton of folks that wont buy another GM Product Now!!
Hell maybe GM Don't need to sell anymore Auto with Gov supporting them
Disclaimer: dad was a chevy guy...
New '80 firebird, v6-231 starter never would start when hot, it heat soaked. New flywheel 'cause of bad tooth. Power steering always whined could never tighten belt enough, mounting bracket broke, used 5 stacked washers to hold it to block..
Exhaust fell off driving to florida in '85!
Traded for new '90 s-10 blazer. 18 months later, repainted under warranty because gray paint peeled everywhere.(happen to lots of other gm cars too) next intermittent dashboard gauges going wacky.
Replaced cluster with another with wrong color blank fillin covers., oh well that is best we could do. Leaving dealer gauges wacked out, pulled back in. They shipped my old dash can't get it back. Tech found pinched wire harness at trans, fixed issue.. next day...
Then traded for '97 tahoe built to my order. Was fine until first recall 20k or so) for something i don't recall, and the steering was never the same, it was 3x worse than the excursion! Before my redhead of course. The tahoe actually felt like driving a boat, you anticipating when you needed to start turning the wheel.
I also love working on my king of suvs again! With the fine help of fte. By far, this sight ensures staying a loyal Ford owner.
Oh, my excursion gets better fuel mileage than any vehicle i've owned!
Sent from my Sprint PC36100 using IB AutoGroup










