When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This (stock) engine had a bent #8 intake PR and #8 exhaust PR was always 'loose'. Well, they found lifter parts in the oil pan - so that may explain why exhaust PR was loose. But, it bent a new PR on intake in one revolution (by hand).
Is it possible the intake lifter is spun on the cam?
Id like to see a discussion about why this happens. Here are some things I've thought of:
- coking/carbon on exhaust valve stem causes valve to stick in guide - of course the piston is coming along to 'help' it close a second later. PR gets out of seat on lifter/rocker and there isnt room for it so ya get a pretzel
Spooky stuff - eh? You ask a room full of 7.3L enthusiasts... all you get is crickets and deer-in-the-headlight looks. A binding valve stem is the only thing that makes sense to me. A cam out of time could do it, but that would effect an entire side.
Im stretching here...
But if something is amiss causing exaggerated egt's...
May hap an exhaust valve can start to go red hot... then liquify at the camfer.
Valve + port of head become patternwelded.
Pushrod breaks the weld on next revolution... but bends in the process...
We know this engine had lifter issues. I'm sure those lifter bits in the oil pan had an important job...
Looks like he is going to use a different longblock, but I hope he'll dissect this one enough to find a smoking gun before he takes it off the stand.
I dont mind not getting a lot of feedback sometimes. This is not an epidemic-type problem. Lots of us can contribute when there is a no start or oil leak - because that happened to us. The number of bent pushrods minus all those who never investigated and theoretically the pool of experience is very small.
Spooky stuff - eh? You ask a room full of 7.3L enthusiasts... all you get is crickets and deer-in-the-headlight looks. A binding valve stem is the only thing that makes sense to me. A cam out of time could do it, but that would effect an entire side.
When I read this tread I did feel like I was a deer caught by a set of headlights! But after thinking about it for awhile I have a couple of ideas.
First of all on these 7.3's I don't you see many push rod issues with stock trucks or truck with stock tunes driven by old guys that don't run higher rpm's having this problem. I think the issue comes into play when you are running a modded engine/tunes with higher boost and higher rpm's. I would bet that this is more of an issue with younger guys who want to hot rod these engines.
Now speaking of young guys who want to hot rod or beat the crap out of everything they drive. Believe it or not I was once a young man who beat the living crap out of everything I drove and doing so I have bent, broke or blown up just about everything. And in my experience with bent push rods (Which has been quite a few !) All on gasser v8's in cars and boats. Sometimes it was due to lifter, rocker arms, bent valve, crappy weak stock push rods, too much valve spring pressure and almost always high rpms.
It has been about 3 yrs now that I have been trying to learn all I can about these 7.3/ T444E and what makes them tick. The one thing I have never liked on these engines is the stock rocker arms. I see guys addressing the issue of push rods and valve springs. But never do I see anyone going with upgraded valves with a 4 angle valve job (to deal with seat pressure) or going with roller rocker arms. I am a big fan of using roller rocker arms on anything I have build in the past and not just high preformance or anything I want to last forever.
Roller rocker arms help reduce stress/ pressure from the valvetrain and push rods.
But in this case I would say too many rpms and bent valves with worn guides is causing the issue.
I can relate to what hes seeing about the roller rocker arms, with our rocker arms the force that they apply on our valves and push rods is.not straight down, a lot of the force is at an angle which will eventually wear on the valves and valve guides. To address this issue. Like he.mentioned, they use roller rocker arms which keeps most of the force on top pushing straight down instead of at
an angle to the valves, id really like to see roller rocker arms for our engines...
By higher rpms do you.mean past redline or high rpms as in 2500-3200 which I believe is about all a stock or lightly modded (chip)
truck will run to, 3200 rpm
I can relate to what hes seeing about the roller rocker arms, with our rocker arms the force that they apply on our valves and push rods is.not straight down, a lot of the force is at an angle which will eventually wear on the valves and valve guides. To address this issue. Like he.mentioned, they use roller rocker arms which keeps most of the force on top pushing straight down instead of at
an angle to the valves, id really like to see roller rocker arms for our engines...
By higher rpms do you.mean past redline or high rpms as in 2500-3200 which I believe is about all a stock or lightly modded (chip)
truck will run to, 3200 rpm
There is a company that makes roller rocker arms for the 7.3. I have looked into it and I can not think of the name of the company off hand. But I do remember the cost was insane I think in the area $2500. It really just isn't cost effective on these 7.3's. But if we could get the demand up maybe production cost go down .....and hopefully they would pass that down to the customer NOT!!
But at one point I had called the company and they said due to low production runs that is why cost is high. Stupid in my opinion since if they increased production run they could lower cost and in turn sell more.
Sorry for the ....