Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

The competition is getting stiff!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-13-2013, 04:25 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
The competition is getting stiff!

Just read that figures for the 6.2L V8 in the 2014 Silverado and Sierra have been released. A very impressive 420 HP and 460 ft-lbs of torque is what this mill will be churning out, and it will tow up to 12,000 lbs.

6.2L V-8 Output Figures Released for 2014 Silverado, Sierra

I have to admit I'm very impressed. Unfortunately they are doing a typical GM move and only putting these monsters in the top trim levels available.
 
  #2  
Old 09-13-2013, 05:30 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It is def. getting good. I am ford guy but they are all getting better. I have no doubt ford will come out with something good. But it will be hard form them to match gm on fuel economy with there cylinder deactivation. They have got that mastered.
 
  #3  
Old 09-13-2013, 06:50 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
No doubt ncl.

Found some information on the Cummins mill they will be putting in the new Titan.

Cummins Engines

And I quote:

Originally Posted by Cummins
With a torque rating in the mid-500s (lb-ft) and more than 300 horsepower
Now THAT's impressive...it should outperform a stock 6.0L Powerstroke. Of course the real question is whether or not the chassis will be able to match the capability of the engine. And if it does then it will be a bona fide 3/4 ton truck, probably with the ride and handling to match. We will see, but I'm very interested in how this turns out.

When I bought my F150 it was the best tool for the job; but depending on what the future brings it may not be next time. We'll see.
 
  #4  
Old 09-13-2013, 10:49 PM
Pool Runner's Avatar
Pool Runner
Pool Runner is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Too bad on the looks of the Chevy though, they really blew that. But in hindsight I thought the, then new '09 F-150 looked feminized when it first came out, loved the blocky traditional truck look of the '04-'08. I hated the upside down looking taillights and the grill and headlights on the '09.

Then I bought my '11 XLT in the fall of 2010.

Today I feel like the 2011+ FX-4 (appearance pkg) , KR, Limited & Platinum's are some of the most handsome trucks ever made (second to the '72 C20) that is.

Not going to lie though, a guy at my kids daycare just purchased a brand new 2014 Ram 1500, it's all blacked out with the led and projector lights etc.. It is a sexy looking truck but I won't let him know that.
 
  #5  
Old 09-14-2013, 12:00 AM
Ziegelsteinfaust's Avatar
Ziegelsteinfaust
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
For me the Dodge is a good looking truck, but the big deal for me is the ram box.

If I was to lay down my money I would buy a F150. GM is to easy to lower, and Dodge has kits now. So for me its a challenge that I would like to take up, but I think it has a awesome presence with the black grille.
 
  #6  
Old 09-14-2013, 02:11 AM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ziegelsteinfaust
GM is to easy to lower, and Dodge has kits now.
Lower? That's not something you hear every day.
 
  #7  
Old 09-14-2013, 06:02 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,153
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
In the newest edition of Truck Trend, they report that the Ram"s diesel will be a $2800 premium over the base V-6 and $1500 over the Hemi 5.7L. They also report that it will boast a 9200 lb tow rating.

That's right in line with my ecoboost with 3.31's except the diesel will reported achieve an EPA estimate of 18/25.

I can now kind of see why Ford is hesitant to add the diesel to the very robust F-150 engine line-up.
 
  #8  
Old 09-14-2013, 06:34 AM
King Ranch's Avatar
King Ranch
King Ranch is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Be interested to see what rpm's those new numbers come in at.
 
  #9  
Old 09-14-2013, 07:38 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I expect gm power numbers to be in the lower rpm range since they are not overhead cam engines. We will see though.
 
  #10  
Old 09-14-2013, 07:49 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
OHC means nothing in this regard. The 2v modular engines are OHC and they make 90% of peak torque below 2000 RPMs.

The GM 6.2 is extremely impressive on paper with it's whopping 11.5:1 compression ratio. When this was released I expected it to be a monster. But the rated torque is substantially higher than HP, which means that it isn't going to have a screaming top end. Its going to be a real stump puller, and what the Ford 6.2 should have been from the start.
 
  #11  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:04 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I stand corrected sir. Isn't it typical though that ohc engines are capable of higher rpms than traditional ohv engines such as gm. I do like the simplicity of a good ol ohv engine.
 
  #12  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:22 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by ncl
I stand corrected sir. Isn't it typical though that ohc engines are capable of higher rpms than traditional ohv engines such as gm. I do like the simplicity of a good ol ohv engine.
That certainly is one of the benefits, as the direct actuation of the valves makes higher RPMs possible. But there are other factors as well. The Cummins ISX heavy truck engine redlines at 2,100 RPMs and is a DOHC design.
 
  #13  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:33 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Very interesting
 
  #14  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:02 PM
stephen.osborne1's Avatar
stephen.osborne1
stephen.osborne1 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Idaho
Posts: 2,350
Received 178 Likes on 126 Posts
Like the previous 6.2, I bet this one still has piston slap over 4,500 RPMs, exactly where it makes its power. 10.5:1 compression? Damn! Hope they don't expect anyone in a hot climate to tow anything.
 
  #15  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:10 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by stephen.osborne1
10.5:1 compression? Damn! Hope they don't expect anyone in a hot climate to tow anything.
It's 11.5, and I'm certain they have taken steps to ensure that the engine will survive in hot weather. Remember that this engine has the benefit of direct injection that most of Ford's truck engines do not.
 


Quick Reply: The competition is getting stiff!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.