Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

The competition is getting stiff!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 08:16 PM
  #16  
stephen.osborne1's Avatar
stephen.osborne1
Cargo Master
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 898
From: Montana
Originally Posted by Tom
It's 11.5, and I'm certain they have taken steps to ensure that the engine will survive in hot weather. Remember that this engine has the benefit of direct injection that most of Ford's truck engines do not.
Sorry, fat fingers, and football watching, alcohol influenced typing.... "Survive" in hot weather? GM motors (in my experiences) have never liked hot weather. Time for a 5.0 Ecoboost.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 08:57 PM
  #17  
efx4's Avatar
efx4
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
I've been very curious about the specs of the GM 6.2 in regard to the Ford's 3.5 and 6.2. The reported numbers are very impressive, but if the Silverado's 5.3 received 13 MPG in the comparison test, I have to believe it's possible that the 6.2 would have gotten worse MPG, but much better performance. I was surprised that in the comparison specs, the Ford was said to need 91 octane gasoline. That's only recommended for towing and hauling, but not mandatory.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 07:12 AM
  #18  
Robbgt's Avatar
Robbgt
Logistics Pro
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 103
From: FL
Originally Posted by Tom
it's whopping 11.5:1 compression ratio.
Wow, that's pretty high compression to run on 87 octane... I wonder if 89 or higher will be required. I'm guessing no, and that they worked some magic with the DI and programming to run on regular.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 07:26 AM
  #19  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Robbgt
Wow, that's pretty high compression to run on 87 octane... I wonder if 89 or higher will be required. I'm guessing no, and that they worked some magic with the DI and programming to run on regular.
I dunno...

Back when I had my Mustang I did lots of reading on the engine. They mentioned that they had to use piston cooling jets as well as adaptive spark timing to get the engine to run safely on 87 octane, and that had an 11.0:1 compression ratio.

I think it is a big mistake for them to limit this to the highest trim levels. I've never been one to spend the money on trucks that highly equipped, but I tow lots of heavy things. I don't see myself buying one in the future for this reason, but we'll see what the future brings.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 07:27 AM
  #20  
ncl's Avatar
ncl
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 10
From: Green Springs, OH
I know a couple people who have the 5.3 in there 4x4 pickups. They are averaging 18 with mixed driving. Jumping right up to low 20s on highway. That is pretty darn good. My 5.0 is just below those numbers at 14-16 mixed and 19 highway. With 3.55 gears. I would expect there 6.2 to probably post numbers around 17 highway in 4 popper mode. Which ain't to bad. Still like ford better though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2013 | 07:40 AM
  #21  
Robbgt's Avatar
Robbgt
Logistics Pro
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 103
From: FL
Originally Posted by Tom
I think it is a big mistake for them to limit this to the highest trim levels. I've never been one to spend the money on trucks that highly equipped, but I tow lots of heavy things.
Agreed, they will be pushing customers away that don't want, need or can't afford the higher trim levels but need the higher towing capacity of the larger output engine.

Unless I'm mistaken, I believe even a base XL F150 can be had with the ecoboost.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJS5689
2009 - 2014 F150
6
Jun 21, 2010 10:17 PM
Megalodon1
Ford vs The Competition
28
Jan 8, 2005 08:40 AM
sinister73
Ford vs The Competition
24
Mar 10, 2004 09:56 AM
ktmguy70
Ford vs The Competition
5
Jun 7, 2003 01:11 AM
72f100
2004 - 2008 F150
4
Feb 1, 2003 02:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE