Which engine would you choose?
#1
Which engine would you choose?
My original plan was a 351C down in the '49. However since then I have come own multiple options. The 351c, a unbored f4te roller windsor, and a unbored 302.
All being small bellhousing engine swapping down the road isnt really an issue. however the 351c is EFI. Which means swapping is just more complicated. The C will be the only EFi engine.
My train of thought is :
1) the C will be sexy in any Ford
2) The W is more of a truck engine versus the C
3) the 65 merc weighs less than the '49, very good application for the C
4) the W is fully equipped with Ps pump,AC , etc the C is not. the '49 has a PS rack from the ranger graft, and AC would be a very good bonus. the merc has power nothing in a much smaller engine compartment.
5) for the purists, the mercs engine code is 289, so a 302 is more correct. As well as a complete original car, minus engine and trans.
6) i can always clevor, to get the look.
7) with a new engine the merc will be on the road, and the C is near done.
Im not totally sure what to do, but I guess in the end its nice to have options.
All being small bellhousing engine swapping down the road isnt really an issue. however the 351c is EFI. Which means swapping is just more complicated. The C will be the only EFi engine.
My train of thought is :
1) the C will be sexy in any Ford
2) The W is more of a truck engine versus the C
3) the 65 merc weighs less than the '49, very good application for the C
4) the W is fully equipped with Ps pump,AC , etc the C is not. the '49 has a PS rack from the ranger graft, and AC would be a very good bonus. the merc has power nothing in a much smaller engine compartment.
5) for the purists, the mercs engine code is 289, so a 302 is more correct. As well as a complete original car, minus engine and trans.
6) i can always clevor, to get the look.
7) with a new engine the merc will be on the road, and the C is near done.
Im not totally sure what to do, but I guess in the end its nice to have options.
#2
#5
What fuel injection do you have for the Cleveland mill? That would be interesting. I agree there's not a sexier engine than the 351C. The biggest drawback to that engine is the fact pretty much everything for it is old stuff, and the developments made on the Windsor platforms over the last 30 years have kind of kicked it to the curb. But if you have an efi setup for it that would work good, that could be a really cool choice.
The Comet engine compartment is tiny, and anything but the 302 in there, and especially using the Cleveland may require some minor surgery. Just to keep it simple I'd stay with the 302. If you wanted more cubes in there, there's always the 331 or 347 options, which would really make it a sleeper.
So with that said, choose which 351 you'd prefer in the truck and go for it.
The Comet engine compartment is tiny, and anything but the 302 in there, and especially using the Cleveland may require some minor surgery. Just to keep it simple I'd stay with the 302. If you wanted more cubes in there, there's always the 331 or 347 options, which would really make it a sleeper.
So with that said, choose which 351 you'd prefer in the truck and go for it.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
njm12
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
06-24-2010 05:49 AM
monroemike
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
01-02-2003 10:46 AM
loudfords
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
04-07-2002 10:11 PM