6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Technical opinions/facts wanted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-17-2013, 05:34 PM
npccpartsman's Avatar
npccpartsman
npccpartsman is online now
Hotshot

Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Ar
Posts: 15,326
Received 68 Likes on 42 Posts
Technical opinions/facts wanted

Two of the best Ford tech's I know have given me opinions (and they agree) on removing and replacing a piston from the bore without replacing the rings. I'd like to know what everyone else thinks or knows about this subject.
 
  #2  
Old 06-17-2013, 06:35 PM
vloney's Avatar
vloney
vloney is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: waynesville, mo.
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A piston will not wear equally (the bore wont be round). Reinstalling rings that have shaped themselves to an "egg shaped" bore, doesn't strike me as bright.
 
  #3  
Old 06-17-2013, 07:52 PM
Rusty Axlerod's Avatar
Rusty Axlerod
Rusty Axlerod is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 8,229
Received 136 Likes on 80 Posts
I have put many pistons with the rings that were "wore in" back into the same cylinder they came out of (after changing rod(s) for example), and even swapped a few piston/ring into another engine MOSTLY without issue. Heck, I've pulled pistons and had them knurled and re-installed them with the used rings (Admittedly a flaky repair). This was my own stuff though and the budget was tight, also this was on gassers with compression ratios of 10 to 1 or usually less.

So...what if it's one slug on a v8? The remaining rings have the same amount of wear, what's the benefit on one cylinder having new rings? Well, some considerations:
1.What was the ridge like, could you hang a fingernail on it? If so it needs ridge reamed for disassembly or the rings will likely be damaged.
2. Did you have to ream it? If so the upper ring will bump your transition (the bottom of where the reamer stopped cutting) to the original bore surface. The transition needs to be honed.
3.did you hone it? If so, wear will be increased significantly until the parts "wear in".
4. Check side play in the ring land. If it was significant on the old piston and much tighter on the new one the ring will be a little farther up the bore at TDC and the ridge becomes a consideration again. Also the ring now has a rounded surface (facing the bore) and it's going to take longer for it to wear in or it may not wear in at all.
5. Ring tension good? If the engine has been overheated the rings will relax and the reduced spring tension will also reduce you chances of it wearing in properly.

No matter how slick you are the old ring(s) on the new piston are not going to be in exactly the same place when you reassemble it. So if you can see the wear marks from the ring grooves it need to be honed. The accelerated wear of the honed cylinder wall and the already worn ring will make this repair the likely first failer down the road.

So, I would say it could be ok IF you don't have to ridge ream or hone it, the old piston/ring didn't have excessive side clearance, and the ring tension is good.

So what do you save? The cost of rings on one cylinder and a few minutes to deglaze/hone one cylinder. Seems to me it's well worth the time and a few $$ to properly prep the cylinder and put new rings in it. Now your repair won't be the first cylinder to fail.
 
  #4  
Old 06-17-2013, 09:05 PM
npccpartsman's Avatar
npccpartsman
npccpartsman is online now
Hotshot

Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Ar
Posts: 15,326
Received 68 Likes on 42 Posts
It's not one hole it was all 8 and they would have only come out to clean and check. Now I'm having to replace one piston because of a freak accident so it's obviously getting new rings (I had a piston), but I won't pull the rest.

This block only has 40K miles on it and had a lifter failure which required replacement of the cam. I had the crank polished while it was out because of a funky looking main bearing. It didn't require turning at all.
 
  #5  
Old 06-17-2013, 09:13 PM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
vloney i understand your statement. i have you had any charge backs for excessive parts latly?
ive pulled enugh pistons on fords dime already got a charge back that was a piston and set of rings on a 6.4 for over repair was told i should have replace only the rod and honed the cyclinder.
any thoughts?
 
  #6  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:38 AM
vloney's Avatar
vloney
vloney is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: waynesville, mo.
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by cheezit
vloney i understand your statement. i have you had any charge backs for excessive parts latly?
ive pulled enugh pistons on fords dime already got a charge back that was a piston and set of rings on a 6.4 for over repair was told i should have replace only the rod and honed the cyclinder.
any thoughts?
Document, Document, Document!
 
  #7  
Old 06-18-2013, 05:11 PM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by vloney
Document, Document, Document!
I ive been down this road too. part was called back and inspected. no amount of document will save you from that.
sadly you know were im comming from. I dont miss it ... yet
 
  #8  
Old 06-18-2013, 06:01 PM
vloney's Avatar
vloney
vloney is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: waynesville, mo.
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've got one under review now. They want to know why I replaced the converter on it and what was wrong with it (eco-boost f150), It was their tsb that I followed!
 
  #9  
Old 06-18-2013, 06:07 PM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by vloney
I've got one under review now. They want to know why I replaced the converter on it and what was wrong with it (eco-boost f150), It was their tsb that I followed!
f-me. this says wonders and tim sorry for
 
  #10  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:31 PM
MC5C's Avatar
MC5C
MC5C is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As far as the pistons are concerned, I've done it on race engines and had no issues.

Brian
 
  #11  
Old 06-18-2013, 07:41 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by vloney
A piston will not wear equally (the bore wont be round). Reinstalling rings that have shaped themselves to an "egg shaped" bore, doesn't strike me as bright.
Piston rings rotate as the piston is moving up and down in the bore.

Josh
 
  #12  
Old 06-18-2013, 09:16 PM
Rusty Axlerod's Avatar
Rusty Axlerod
Rusty Axlerod is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 8,229
Received 136 Likes on 80 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Piston rings rotate as the piston is moving up and down in the bore.

Josh
Man, I've heard some sparky discussion on that subject!


(Valves rotate too)
 
  #13  
Old 06-18-2013, 09:36 PM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Rusty Axlerod
Man, I've heard some sparky discussion on that subject!


(Valves rotate too)
Sealed-Power of Federal Mogul have done numerous tests on piston ring rotation. Didn't think people still thought otherwise since the early 80s on that subject.

Guys still debating it?

As Barry Rabotnick, formerly of Sealed-Power and currently of Survival Motorsports fame explains:

"they rotate slowly - maybe 10-12 RPM on average, in a near random fashion. At Sealed Power they used a radioactive pellet embedded into the rings to track that in the lab. Found that the rings did move, sometimes even changed direction. If they rotate fast something is wrong with the cylinder finish and they'll wear out quickly."


And high speed cameras show the valve rotation, tons of Youtube videos of that.

Josh
 
  #14  
Old 06-19-2013, 06:25 AM
npccpartsman's Avatar
npccpartsman
npccpartsman is online now
Hotshot

Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Ar
Posts: 15,326
Received 68 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Sealed-Power of Federal Mogul have done numerous tests on piston ring rotation. Didn't think people still thought otherwise since the early 80s on that subject.

Guys still debating it?

As Barry Rabotnick, formerly of Sealed-Power and currently of Survival Motorsports fame explains:

"they rotate slowly - maybe 10-12 RPM on average, in a near random fashion. At Sealed Power they used a radioactive pellet embedded into the rings to track that in the lab. Found that the rings did move, sometimes even changed direction. If they rotate fast something is wrong with the cylinder finish and they'll wear out quickly."


And high speed cameras show the valve rotation, tons of Youtube videos of that.

Josh
This also brings into question the necessity of installing ring gaps at various intervals on the pistons although I'll continue to do it "just because".
 
  #15  
Old 06-19-2013, 07:27 AM
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Bullitt390 is offline
Certified Thread Hijacker

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,433
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by npccpartsman
This also brings into question the necessity of installing ring gaps at various intervals on the pistons although I'll continue to do it "just because".
It helps at start-up I suppose, and I still clock the gaps accordingly knowing they rotate.

Watch the high speed camera stuff on valves, amazing how spaghetti like they are at 9000+ rpm.

Josh
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nickt34
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
10
04-18-2015 06:57 PM
dustinova
General Automotive Discussion
2
11-09-2006 07:52 PM
bshackelford711
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
18
05-17-2005 04:03 PM
fordflaresides
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
6
07-30-2004 11:00 PM
dual_rangers
Performance & General Engine Building
2
11-17-2003 10:32 PM



Quick Reply: Technical opinions/facts wanted



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.