Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

building a 12" lift

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-28-2013, 03:04 PM
Evan_P's Avatar
Evan_P
Evan_P is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,490
Received 106 Likes on 86 Posts
You say mostly off road use. What exactly does that mean? Mainly mud pits? Trails?
 
  #17  
Old 05-28-2013, 03:38 PM
BigBlockF350's Avatar
BigBlockF350
BigBlockF350 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: VA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tjc transport
instead of 12 inch lift, i would go max 6 inch lift and cut the fenders and bumper for clearance.

i know a few guys that run 44 inch tires with 6 inch lift and cut fenders without any problems.
I agree with this. If you don't want to be fixing things all the time I don't think I'd do over 6" suspension lift.

You can add a body lift and/or cut the bumper/fenders to get the tire clearance you need.
 
  #18  
Old 05-28-2013, 05:14 PM
firerescue9's Avatar
firerescue9
firerescue9 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Windsor
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ya i suppose you could do that, cut the fenders and such...but mines been restored and has somewhat fresh paint....no way on gods green earth am i cutting them haha

Plus i want the clearance with the 44s, not just the look of them. they do no good if they are always rubbin
 
  #19  
Old 05-28-2013, 05:16 PM
BigBlockF350's Avatar
BigBlockF350
BigBlockF350 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: VA
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by firerescue9
Ya i suppose you could do that, cut the fenders and such...but mines been restored and has somewhat fresh paint....no way on gods green earth am i cutting them haha

Plus i want the clearance with the 44s, not just the look of them. they do no good if they are always rubbin
For your truck, I'd probably do 6" suspension, 3" body, and d60 axles that'll give you 2". That makes 11", should clear some decent tires.
 
  #20  
Old 05-28-2013, 07:24 PM
dixiestripes351's Avatar
dixiestripes351
dixiestripes351 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya now that im thankin about it I could easly sink several thousand dollars into a suspension system just like I do engines lol. the drive angles can be corrected by cutting and rewelding components on the axles and modifying them so the gears are still getting lubricated properly. would be a whole lot of work and money like the rest of yall are saying. but that is a good idea bigblockf350 with doin a 6 inch suspension, body lift and SAS.
 
  #21  
Old 05-28-2013, 08:19 PM
firerescue9's Avatar
firerescue9
firerescue9 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Windsor
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just remember that the pinion and output shaft of the tcase have to be for the most part parallel, you cant just slant up your axle (or so ive been told)

The way i see it Bigblock, since i have to go to leafs in the front, im going to do a sky shackle reversal thing, and it has a reciever hitch in the front too, along with the 8" superduty leafs. for the rear ill do 8" springs, a 3"RSK with a 3" body lift. and the sas +2". so looking at 14" in the front, 16" in the rear.

plenty of room for those 44"s to have lots travel
 
  #22  
Old 05-30-2013, 09:24 AM
dixiestripes351's Avatar
dixiestripes351
dixiestripes351 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by firerescue9
Just remember that the pinion and output shaft of the tcase have to be for the most part parallel, you cant just slant up your axle (or so ive been told)

The way i see it Bigblock, since i have to go to leafs in the front, im going to do a sky shackle reversal thing, and it has a reciever hitch in the front too, along with the 8"
superduty leafs. for the rear ill do 8" springs, a 3"RSK with a 3" body lift. and the sas +2". so looking at 14" in the front, 16" in the rear.

plenty of room for those 44"s to have lots travel
.


that's a good idea but are the drive angles still goin to be within spec or will it need to be corrected?
 
  #23  
Old 05-30-2013, 11:09 AM
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
GNR22 is offline
Fabri-cobbler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,163
Received 515 Likes on 340 Posts
Originally Posted by firerescue9
Just remember that the pinion and output shaft of the tcase have to be for the most part parallel, you cant just slant up your axle (or so ive been told)

The way i see it Bigblock, since i have to go to leafs in the front, im going to do a sky shackle reversal thing, and it has a reciever hitch in the front too, along with the 8" superduty leafs. for the rear ill do 8" springs, a 3"RSK with a 3" body lift. and the sas +2". so looking at 14" in the front, 16" in the rear.

plenty of room for those 44"s to have lots travel
Why on earth are you going to make your truck that tall? It's going to be nearly unusable.
 
  #24  
Old 05-30-2013, 01:10 PM
damarble's Avatar
damarble
damarble is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by firerescue9
Just remember that the pinion and output shaft of the tcase have to be for the most part parallel, you cant just slant up your axle (or so ive been told)
For standard u-joints, yes, but if you have a double cardan at the t-case end the pinion can (and must) be pointed at the t-case, not parallel.
 
  #25  
Old 05-30-2013, 04:14 PM
dixiestripes351's Avatar
dixiestripes351
dixiestripes351 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GNR22
Why on earth are you going to make your truck that tall? It's going to be nearly unusable.

lol for deep mud and swamp lands haha
 
  #26  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:20 PM
firerescue9's Avatar
firerescue9
firerescue9 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Windsor
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by damarble
For standard u-joints, yes, but if you have a double cardan at the t-case end the pinion can (and must) be pointed at the t-case, not parallel.
Huh, learn something new everyday. Ive never heard of that. Can it be used for the rear as well?
 
  #27  
Old 05-30-2013, 11:15 PM
damarble's Avatar
damarble
damarble is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by firerescue9
Huh, learn something new everyday. Ive never heard of that. Can it be used for the rear as well?
You bet. It works even better since you don't have to deal with caster. Some short wheelbase vehicles come with them stock front and rear.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cannonrush
Excursion - King of SUVs
22
01-07-2016 10:41 PM
kidkyle21
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
01-30-2013 02:39 PM
jwc410
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
2
01-13-2010 03:05 PM
1_Mike
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
06-27-1999 09:10 AM



Quick Reply: building a 12" lift



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.