1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Edelbrock or Holley?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-18-2013, 01:50 PM
BlackGold1955F100's Avatar
BlackGold1955F100
BlackGold1955F100 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edelbrock or Holley?

Which carburetor would add more horsepower to a 351w, a Edelbrock 1406 600 cfm, or a Holley 670 cfm?
 
  #2  
Old 05-18-2013, 08:11 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by BlackGold1955F100
Which carburetor would add more horsepower to a 351w, a Edelbrock 1406 600 cfm, or a Holley 670 cfm?
That's a really loaded question that would take a book to cover, then it would be specific to a particular engine but basically if they are both vacuum secondaries, and the jets etc optimized on a dyno the HP should be virtually identical. The only difference would be if you just bolt each on without optimizing them, then it's a crapshoot as to which one happens to be closer to what your engine needs out of the box. The rest of the engine determines the max HP the engine can develop.
 
  #3  
Old 05-18-2013, 08:20 PM
quickshift's Avatar
quickshift
quickshift is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
If it's a stock setup, you won't see any difference. If you want to take it out of the box and bolt in on, either one. If you want it to perform to it's max and you understand how to tune a carb properly, then the Holley is the best bet.
 
  #4  
Old 05-19-2013, 01:04 AM
old_dan's Avatar
old_dan
old_dan is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
If you're planning on running your engine on the street for normal driving, I prefer the Edelbrock. Their tuning manual and availability jets and stepped needles for power enrichment and normal metering through the main metering jet makes it pretty easy. Yes...you can get the same adjustments with a Holley as well. I just think Edelbrock did a better job than Holley in putting together the owners manual. It is designed to help average guys tune relatively well.

This question is bound to get some vehement responses from both political parties...er... make that both carburetor owners groups! I happen to own both kinds (not for the same cars). I guess that makes me a moderate.

Somewhere around 600 cfm size is a good size for the 351w by the way.

Dan
 
  #5  
Old 05-19-2013, 08:17 AM
hotstuff's Avatar
hotstuff
hotstuff is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: constantine,mi.
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also have both carbs ,like edelbrock simple design and the HOLLEYS PERFORMANCE
 
  #6  
Old 05-21-2013, 03:43 PM
Jag Red 54's Avatar
Jag Red 54
Jag Red 54 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Valley Center, CA
Posts: 4,485
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Go with the Edlebrock for simplicity. Also, they cost less. Jag
 
  #7  
Old 05-22-2013, 08:18 AM
GreatNorthWoods's Avatar
GreatNorthWoods
GreatNorthWoods is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Littleton, New Hampshire
Posts: 8,808
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I've used both. Can't tell any difference. The main thing is to use the right cfm for your engine. On the 351 I would use a 600 cfm for better throttle response unless your engine is highly modified...
 
  #8  
Old 05-22-2013, 01:41 PM
truckeemtnfords's Avatar
truckeemtnfords
truckeemtnfords is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Truckee, CA
Posts: 3,301
Received 177 Likes on 126 Posts
Neither, HP potential is determined by other items within the engine, the carb is used to optimize fuel delivery for the best results with the other components. If you need to ask that question I say you should go with Carter/Webber/Edelbrock (all have sold this style of carb) AFB style carb as they are more user friendly for people without a lot of carb experience. There are a lot of things to consider beyond just the ci displacement.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whisler
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
30
03-20-2011 10:03 AM
7mpg302
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
1
12-04-2008 04:13 PM
704core
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
13
05-03-2007 12:11 PM
fordeverpower
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
2
08-17-2003 01:52 AM
clean79150
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
5
07-08-2003 10:18 PM



Quick Reply: Edelbrock or Holley?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.