Notices

351 Clever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2013 | 09:45 PM
  #31  
blueovalandy's Avatar
blueovalandy
Senior User
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 104
Likes: 3
From: Charleston
Cool looking 302 you have there. I haven't seen anyone else build one of these with a factory roller block. One of the problems I ran into was that the taller lifters required shorter pushrods, that created more pushrod angle than the Boss's had. My pushrods would not clear the pushrod holes in the head. I had to enlarge the holes and had one of them break into a water jacket. I was pissed, but I fixed it.

Post some more pictures and specs.

Andy
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2013 | 03:41 AM
  #32  
70sleeper's Avatar
70sleeper
New User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
hmmm, I had to (let them) make the pushrods custom length because I had a simular problem during the build.

My blog has practicly all the info.
If you want / like I can make a page of your build with your trouble and issues on my blog. This can help other clevor enthousiast in the future in my believe.

I lifted my clevor into a 1970 Mustang and had some serieus trouble with the headers, the fitment of both steering and alternator, and a lot more.

My advice, Build only a Clevor if you want to make something you don't see everyday, something oldskool or and one hack of a cool engine.
All other, get a 347 stroker or something in that range with alu heads or such, much cheaper, less trouble !







 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2013 | 08:20 PM
  #33  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
Very nice 70 sportsroof.
Is that the Unisteer rack. I just bought the Unisteer for my fathers 68 coupe. Gonna try it.
What trans is that. Looks like 4spd with a skattershield. Do you have mechanical clutch linkage or hydraulic. It's hard to tell.
I picked up the Modern Driveline internal slave hydraulic clutch kit, for the Kessler t45 just in case I can't get the stock z-bar to work.
How long have you had the rack. I'm curious about the heim joints/rod ends as tie rods. I went with regular tie rods on my kit. I'm wondering how they are lasting.

Anyway.
I have a vintage b&a track boss intake for 2v heads on a Windsor. And a real boss 302 intake for when I do a stroker.
I had a real boss 302 with 2.25 intake valves, and while it was peppy down low, it come alive at 5k and pulled to over 8k where the tach stopped moving. These big heads don't hurt it as much as they think.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 01:23 AM
  #34  
70sleeper's Avatar
70sleeper
New User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Yo,

This is a rack from Steeroids... to be honest, its still a bit of a problem to get it to work right. It has a hard spot in each turn, the knee cupling ( did i spell that right ) does not have the best angle. A job for the winter I would say.
The engine is in there since september this year, so I cant tell you all about the rack, i drove about 250 miles in it so far so its still a bit to get to know the engine and car plus it has the break in propperly.

As for the transmission, yes... its a 4 speed toploader with Hurst shifter.
We used the manual clutch with the original linkage system. Down-side, the equalizer bar does not line up that well in combination with the exhaust and the steeroids set, so we had to place it in a angle.

At first, we used the Boss302 hooker haeders... but they didn't fit AT ALL !
Now, we used the shorty 351C headers from sandersons and they fit much better, but had to squeeze them into because of the difference in deck-height.

I decided to go with a different set-up as yours if i understand you correctly. I want to take place at touring events and do some traffic light races, but mine starts pulling from about idle to around 6000Rpm.
Yours from 5 to 8 ! ! thats a real screamer, cool !
You must use yours on the track i suppose ? mine for road only and maybe some trackday in the future but that is not the main goal.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 07:55 AM
  #35  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
My old boss 302 I picked up from a guy who built it for a circle track racecar. But then the guy couldn't use it because the rules said it had to use a cast iron intake... No such thing for a boss.
I got the motor and tore it down, shaved some of the piston down to get it to a street able compression, put in a different solid cam, and a predator 950cfm street carb, and with the 4spd in the car it would freakin rip.
I ended up selling the motor to a guy building a 69 boss.
I wish I kept it. I had a crossboss intake for it also. But to find a rebuild kit for the inline autolite carb was impossible.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 01:31 PM
  #36  
70sleeper's Avatar
70sleeper
New User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Any Idea if the clevor engine is still around ?







I'm concidering building such a PCV system... any idea if you could use this system in a normal street set-up, of do you need a vacuum pump along with this ?
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 02:44 PM
  #37  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
I don't remember that having a pcv in it.
That setup is for racing and all it was for was to vent crankcase pressure. They had a wind age tray so not much vapor really. I think it would be unique and cool for you to have. And make adding oil easier.
A scavenging vacuum pump can help with a few applications, but I don't think this is one. I've only used it on racecars where they want that extra 3hp.

I've never owned a clevor, just a real boss 302.
I've worked on an oldschool clevor though, with 400m crank and Chrysler 6 rods, for the oldschool stroker 400cid engine. It was in a badass fairmont drag car.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 11:55 PM
  #38  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Clevor insights

That's an interesting observation about the problem caused by shorter and thus more angled pushrods in a roller cam "Boss" 302.

I suppose with a 351 Windsor based "Clevor" that problem would go away.

Even though the Cleveland headed Windsor is a much more troublesome (and moneysome) engine to build than a modern Windsor type aluminum headed engine, the Cleveland headed mill simply looks so good.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 31, 2013 | 03:07 AM
  #39  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 205
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

I wonder about the interference of the pushrods in the heads. The holes must be either very small or located just at the wrong place. I note that the roller 302 Windsor also has very short pushrods; would a Clevor 302 have even shorter pushrods? If anything, I thought the Cleveland heads were a little taller than the Windsor. I recently replaced the 1.6:1 ratio sled rockers with 1.7:1 ratio roller rockers on my 302 (5.0), and noted the difference in ratio comes from the pushrod side of the arm being about 6% shorter on the 1.7:1 arm. This moves the pushrod that much closer to one side of the hole, but it doesn't touch.

A long time ago, I went to JBA in San Diego to get a pair of the 2V version of the Aussie Cleveland heads. Just out of curiosity, I asked them what it would cost to do a performance head job on them. So in addition to the standard valve job that they needed, they would bore out the ports and smooth out the combustion chamber, all for about $2200. And they will custom fabricate a set of headers for any car for only $2500. It was a little pricy for me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2014 | 12:23 PM
  #40  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Headers

"And they will custom fabricate a set of headers for any car for only $2500. It was a little pricy for me."

Well the positive side of this is that now any of us can justify spending $2500 on a TIG welder and materials and learning to use it!
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2014 | 01:03 PM
  #41  
70sleeper's Avatar
70sleeper
New User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Building a Clevor is nog Clever.
It is much more expensive then any windsor / stroker / cleveland build with the same goals.
But I think a clevor is high set goal and believe one of the rarest engines to build in a normal street version car.
Custom made headers... for 2500,- dollars. Yeah Right, I suppose they will come and test fit with the engine in place then ? or only port matched to the head ?

I know this is a truck forum and a might be highjacking this with a mustang... but i don't believe the engine bays will not differ much ( right )

well, the boss302 hooker super competition plus headers...... do not fit ( AT ALL )









well... after banging those headers up to pieces... we ditched them and uses shortys





 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #42  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
"Building a Clevor is nog Clever."

I am not too familiar with the car in the previous post, but it looks to me like it has non-stock steering and bellhousing which are the parts that are interfering with the headers.

So it may well be that the Hooker headers will work with the Mustang in stock configuration.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2014 | 12:31 AM
  #43  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,013
Likes: 205
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Most Mustangs with the recirculating ball steering setup need a bracket to lower the power assist cylinder in order to avoid interference with aftermarket headers. That Steeroids rack is right in the place where the cylinder would be, before being lowered. On the passenger side, where there would normally be a drag link and idler arm, is more of the much thicker rack, so things aren't going to fit. If you have to beat up those header tubes like that, it sort of defeats the purpose of headers.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2014 | 12:40 PM
  #44  
70sleeper's Avatar
70sleeper
New User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Beanscoot
"Building a Clevor is nog Clever."

I am not too familiar with the car in the previous post, but it looks to me like it has non-stock steering and bellhousing which are the parts that are interfering with the headers.

So it may well be that the Hooker headers will work with the Mustang in stock configuration.
Sorry, dutch auto correct.. buidling a Clevor is not Clever
No, it will not work, the tubes bent to far out hitting the chassis on both sides. Maybe, if I used different engine mounts that where a little higher, okay.
But with steeroids definitively not !
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nate5812
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
25
Jul 9, 2005 05:03 AM
shawnlee28
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
Jul 12, 2004 12:30 AM
DGeyer
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
2
Jun 16, 2004 06:46 PM
bigwheelin
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
Feb 26, 2004 02:25 PM
foggy_2
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
Mar 12, 2002 08:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE