Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Power Steering Pitman Arm Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
Lug Nut's Avatar
Lug Nut
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 2
From: Jersey City
Power Steering Pitman Arm Question

Is the Pitman arm for the ford power steering box the same as for the manual steering gear box? The part number in my parts book (what I can decipher of it) seems to be the same for both, but the spline on the output shaft of the power steering box is about 1/8" larger (1-3/16" OD)than on the manual steering box I'm replacing and the old pitman arm doesn't fit. Do I have the wrong box or the wrong pitman arm?

Thanks

This is for a 69 F250 2wd camper special, and I believe the steering boxes are both Saginaw and not Bendix.

a picture of the PS box is here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/114010017362165565741/69F250CumminsSwap?authkey=Gv1sRgCPD7957iur32WA#5786670193028906418

One more post and I can attache pictures directly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
These Fordification articles should answer your question:

Steering/Suspension Component Variations - FORDification.com
How to Install Power Steering in a 2WD F100/250/350 - FORDification.com
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 02:28 AM
  #3  
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 12
From: Black Hills of SD
different. The power steering pitman arm will say power steering right on it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #4  
Old Coyote's Avatar
Old Coyote
Senior User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Ever get this sorted out? I'm curious too as I plan a similar swap (ps for standard). But my intention is to leave the pittman arm on the ps box and attach it to my steering linkage. I'm hoping it's the same for the ps and stndard steering gear on that end (as it appears from these posts it's different on the end that attaches to the box). If my hope is correct, and the pittman arm for the ps gear will attach to my linkage, maybe you could go that route too if you have the arm for the ps gear.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #5  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Old Coyote
Ever get this sorted out? I'm curious too as I plan a similar swap (ps for standard). But my intention is to leave the pittman arm on the ps box and attach it to my steering linkage. I'm hoping it's the same for the ps and stndard steering gear on that end (as it appears from these posts it's different on the end that attaches to the box). If my hope is correct, and the pittman arm for the ps gear will attach to my linkage, maybe you could go that route too if you have the arm for the ps gear.
i believe it will attach to the existing linkage but (from what I have deduced from various tech articles) the angle of the PS pitman arm's drag link end will change the linkage's alignment and interfere (rub/scrape) with the radius arm's pass-thru holes.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 08:39 PM
  #6  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Lug Nut
Is the Pitman Arm for the ford power steering box the same as for the manual steering gear box?
Absolutely not!

The part number in my parts book (what I can decipher of it) seems to be the same for both. Manual Steering: C7TZ-3590-C / Marked: C7TA-3590-N

This is for a 69 F250 2WD camper special, and I believe the steering boxes are both Saginaw and not Bendix.
What parts catalog are you using?

C9TZ-3590-C .. P/S Pitman Arm-Use with Ford (Saginaw) P/S / Marked: C9TA-3590-E / Obsolete / No Ford Dealer or obsolete parts vendor has any.

Applications: 1969/71 F100/250 2WD / 1972 F100/250 2WD before serial number M00,001.

All Pitman Arms have the marked ID number cast onto them / Serial number last 6 digits of the VIN

Bendix P/S: 1966/68 F100/250 2WD / 1969 F100/250 2WD before serial number D96,001.

Ford P/S: 1969 F100/250 2WD & F350 from serial number D96,001 / 1970/79 F100/250 2WD & F350 / 1976/79 F100/150 4WD / 1977 F250 4WD from serial number Y20,001 / 1978/79 F250 4WD / 1979 F350 4WD.

Sources: 1964/72 Ford Truck Parts Catalog & 1973/79 Ford Light Truck Parts Catalog, both available on CD's from hipoparts.com
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 12
From: Black Hills of SD
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
What parts catalog are you using?

C9TZ-3590-C .. P/S Pitman Arm-Use with Ford (Saginaw) P/S / Marked: C9TA-3590-E / Obsolete / No Ford Dealer or obsolete parts vendor has any.

Applications: 1969/71 F100/250 2WD / 1972 F100/250 2WD before serial number M00,001.

All Pitman Arms have the marked ID number cast onto them / Serial number last 6 digits of the VIN

Bendix P/S: 1966/68 F100/250 2WD / 1969 F100/250 2WD before serial number D96,001.

Ford P/S: 1969 F100/250 2WD & F350 from serial number D96,001 / 1970/79 F100/250 2WD & F350 / 1976/79 F100/150 4WD / 1977 F250 4WD from serial number Y20,001 / 1978/79 F250 4WD / 1979 F350 4WD.

Sources: 1964/72 Ford Truck Parts Catalog & 1973/79 Ford Light Truck Parts Catalog, both available on CD's from hipoparts.com


So the 72 had a mid year split on the pitman arms? Seems like I might have a vague remembrance of reading something like that. I converted 2 72s, an F100 and an F250 and didn't have any problem but I don't remember what year of steering boxes I used. I guess I just lucked out.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #8  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Yep... mid-year change.

From Fordification:

TOP (BOTH VIEWS): Late style, casting #D2TA-3590-BA
Used on F100 thru F250 with serial numbers M00001 (late '71) and higher

BOTTOM (BOTH VIEWS): Early style, casting #C9TA-3590-E
Used on F100 thru F250 with serial numbers prior to M00001




Here is a view of the bottom side of the early Pitman arm used on Saginaw boxes up through late-'71. You can see 'F100-F250 PWR STR' cast into the piece.



The Pitman arm used on '67-'69 F100's with Bendix power steering is marked C7TA-3590-L, and will not work with the Ford/Saginaw box.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #9  
Old Coyote's Avatar
Old Coyote
Senior User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
So like most "simple" swaps it can get complicated. I have been looking at the tech article on this swap on the Fordification site (which some of you will also have seen) and I note that it suggests swapping the gear, pittman arm and drag link. I wonder now if the reason for this is it avoids this problem of the different pittman arms and angles. I guess I'll find out soon as I plan to take the column, gear, pittman and drag link off my donor truck some time in the next week.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 11:00 AM
  #10  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Old Coyote
So like most "simple" swaps it can get complicated. I have been looking at the tech article on this swap on the Fordification site (which some of you will also have seen) and I note that it suggests swapping the gear, pittman arm and drag link. I wonder now if the reason for this is it avoids this problem of the different pittman arms and angles. I guess I'll find out soon as I plan to take the column, gear, pittman and drag link off my donor truck some time in the next week.
C'mon man, didn't ya read post #5???
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
Old Coyote's Avatar
Old Coyote
Senior User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Yes, I did. It says "i believe it will attach to the existing linkage but (from what I have deduced from various tech articles) the angle of the PS pitman arm's drag link end will change the linkage's alignment and interfere (rub/scrape) with the radius arm's pass-thru holes." Your post #7 shows several different pittman arms through the late 60s early 70s. Are you saying all of these will result in the problem you identify in Post 5?

By the way, I'm sorry you're frustrated. Hard to be a genius.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 12:24 PM
  #12  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Are you saying all of these will result in the problem you identify in Post 5?
Nope. The pics show the difference between the early and late pitman arms. The late pitman arm has an angled head and changes the link angle whereas the early arm is straight.. combine that fact with what is normally suggested (to also install the matching later model steering linkages) and one may deduce that there would be an issue coupling the late arm with early linkages... and where would the angled head likely create an issue? - at the through the pass-thru holes of the radius arms.

One issue with the Fordification articles referenced in post #2 is that they don't state why the late linkages have to be used when using the late pitman arm - it just says to use 'em. However, my assumption is that someone in the past prolly already figured out the incompatibility so we can only deduce as to why and roll with it.

No worries.... we're here to both help and learn.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 12:34 PM
  #13  
Old Coyote's Avatar
Old Coyote
Senior User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Makes sense and explains a lot. Thanks man. Sorry to be an ah in my last post. I agree, let's keep asking when we need to and anserign when we can.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 12:47 PM
  #14  
Lug Nut's Avatar
Lug Nut
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 2
From: Jersey City
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
Nope. The pics show the difference between the early and late pitman arms. The late pitman arm has an angled head and changes the link angle whereas the early arm is straight.. combine that fact with what is normally suggested (to also install the matching later model steering linkages) and one may deduce that there would be an issue coupling the late arm with early linkages... and where would the angled head likely create an issue? - at the through the pass-thru holes of the radius arms.

One issue with the Fordification articles referenced in post #2 is that they don't state why the late linkages have to be used when using the late pitman arm - it just says to use 'em. However, my assumption is that someone in the past prolly already figured out the incompatibility so we can only deduce as to why and roll with it.

No worries.... we're here to both help and learn.
The Fordification page also shows an arm off the manual box with part# C7TA-3590-L That is says came off the Bendix box. I have one sitting on my desk that has C7TA-3590-N on it and it came off a Ford Manual box (sitting at my feet). So is the difference between L and N Bendix and Ford?

I thought I needed a D2TA-3590-BA arm then thought maybe it was the C9TA-3590-E that I needed. I have yet to find either but I did find a D2TA-3590-FA Which has a different offset than the BA but I can work with that.

I'm still only about 23.64% sure I have any of this correct. The one lesson I did learn is to buy a steering box WITH the Pitman arm next time.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #15  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
C7TZ-3590-C .. Pitman Arm-Use with Manual Steering / Marked: C7TA-3590-N (See post 6).

1967/71 F100/250 2WD / 1972 F100/250 2WD before serial number M00,001.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
C7TZ-3590-F .. Pitman Arm-Use w/Bendix P/S / Marked: C7TA-3590-L

1967/68 F100/250 2WD / 1969 F100/250 2WD before serial number D96,001.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
D2TZ-3590-B .. Pitman Arm-Use w/Ford P/S / Marked: D2TA-3590-BA

1972 F100/250 2WD from serial number M00,001 / 1973/79 F100/250 (includes 1975/79 F150) 2WD Regular & Super Cabs under 8100 lbs. GVW
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D2TZ-3590-D .. Pitman Arm-Use w/Ford P/S / Marked: D2TA-3590-FA

1972 F350 from serial number M00,001 / 1973/79 F250 2WD Super & Crew Cab over 8100 lbs. GVW / 1973/78 F350 / 1979 F350 2WD
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 09:39:23


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE