Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

New guy with a Dynamat question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 02:29 PM
  #1  
Caruso72's Avatar
Caruso72
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
New guy with a Dynamat question

Hey fellas,
Just to start off I want to thank you all, as I have been perusing this forum for quite a while, and have found a fund of knowledge to help me with my newly acquired '64 f100.
Now to the question. Has anyone had any experience with sound deadening? I was thinking about it purely from a road noise aspect, and am wondering if it makes that much of a difference to use Dynamat, fatmat, e-dead...(ETC.).

Thanks,
Tony
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
cobraguy's Avatar
cobraguy
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 2
From: San Diego CA
Makes a big difference. Home depot sells a tar backed aluminum tape in their roofing dept that is effective and way cheaper. Comes in 6" wide rolls.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
I'm not a fan of most of the aftermarket sound insulation products as most are tar/petroluem based which you will not find in any oem application and is extremely damgerous in the event of a fire for your vehicle as even high heat generation tranferred to the product causes decomposition, in essence it reverts back to its original form.....petroleum, and act much like gasoline inside your vehicle.

There are excellent products available that are non-petroleum based....
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by BeechKid
I'm not a fan of the aftermarket sound deadening products as most are tar/petroleum based which you will not find in any oem application.
OEM = Original Equipment Manufacturer: FoMoCo.

Roll the windows up, remove the door access panels, look inside and you will see: black petroleum based undercoating used as sound deadener smeared on the door.

No EPA back then. This is the same stinky goop (when first applied, smells like a dead fish) dealers and gas stations used to spray on undercarriages of vehicles to prevent rust.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:02 PM
  #5  
davewave649's Avatar
davewave649
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, CA
I will be using Mega Mat when i do my truck, its from fatmat but is supposed to work better than the normal fatmat. Dynamat was just too expensive for me but mega mat is supposed to work as well for half the cost. But i havent actually used either thats just off of the word of a couple local builders.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:31 PM
  #6  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
OEM = Original Equipment Manufacturer: FoMoCo.

Roll the windows up, remove the door access panels, look inside and you will see: black petroleum based undercoating used as sound deadener smeared on the door.

No EPA back then. This is the same stinky goop (when first applied, smells like a dead fish) dealers and gas stations used to spray on undercarriages of vehicles to prevent rust.
Yes, you are right, but today we have other options that are readily available and used by the OEM's provided by other aftermarket suppliers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:52 PM
  #7  
Caruso72's Avatar
Caruso72
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Thanks for the advice gentlemen. Much appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 09:05 PM
  #8  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Originally Posted by Beechkid
Yes, you are right, but today we have other options that are readily available and used by the OEM's provided by other aftermarket suppliers.
Must work for dynamat........

In case you have not noticed everything in a car today is flammable except the HHS body.

In case you never noticed there is a 19 gallon gas tank full of highly flammable fuel less than four inches from your ****...

Screw dynamat. Peel and seel great sound dampening material.... - THE H.A.M.B.

Here is the guys on the HAMB discussing it. Read and learn.

Garbz
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 10:10 PM
  #9  
The Masked Rider's Avatar
The Masked Rider
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 8
I've used this on a # of my toys. This stuff has been around for a long time. Great stuff.

Bonded Logic Heat/Sound Insulation - JCWhitney
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #10  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by garbz2
Must work for dynamat........

In case you have not noticed everything in a car today is flammable except the HHS body.

In case you never noticed there is a 19 gallon gas tank full of highly flammable fuel less than four inches from your ****...

Screw dynamat. Peel and seel great sound dampening material.... - THE H.A.M.B.

Here is the guys on the HAMB discussing it. Read and learn.

Garbz
No , professional firefighter, over 500 vehicle fire investigations in my career (documented)- many involved "classic or modified cars" whose owners installed insulation with high levels of petroleum based products....made for a fire that could not be extinguished fast enough due to the rapid spread by onlookers nor professional fire fighters.......well documented & is a part of national standards training for "special hazards- unseen"

second item: "plastic & carbon fiber" body panels- again, you are correct. The mfg's have never realsed the full specifics of the composition as it is considered "proprietary information" even under the hazardous material laws/regulations both at state & federal levels, but, based upon information provided and testdone in both credential labs & field elements it is (and has been for 10+ years) that 1. standard fire fighting protective garmets (turnout boots, pants, coat, hood, helmet, gloves & their vapor barrors) and self contained breathing apparatus do not provide the minimu require personal protection for offensive fire suppression operation involving vehicles mfg with exterior plastic body panels & carbon fiber....This requires a fully encapsulated chemical protective suit with a fire resistive overgarmet (osha & industry standard). In lieu of this, fire fighters may use alternate methods of protection, by standard of practice this includes positining themselves upwind and if necessary employing "power fans" to blow the smoke away from them to engage in offensive operations. The additional hazard is with carbon fiber, although the fire is out there is a residual hazard- particulate matter that becomes airborne (even during transit by the tow service)- that is similar to asbestos with equal/greater hazard. each agency is required to have written policy on how to handle this but in general (as an example) if a aircraft is involved that is made of carbon fiber, that has partially or substantially burned, a "recovery team" is sent in which they essentially wrap the aircraft and all body components in "plastic wrap" prior to transport to contain the particulates.

BTW, all fire fighter protective gear is considered contaminated and require rising with water on the scene prior to departure & secondaly, it must be washed in a "special waahing machine" (which all depts have) upon return to the station.

With hybrids, with the exception of small agencies who do not possess the resources inhouse, I am unaware of any major metro fire department that does not respond 1 hazardous materials response unit with fire suppression resources when any of these vehicles are involved in an accident or other similar type event (fire, etc.)

I won't go into my credentials specifically, but I am recognized as an "expert" both in california & nationally in the field of hazardous substances & chemical related events.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #11  
daveengelson's Avatar
daveengelson
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,305
Likes: 18
From: Boulder Creek, Ca
Club FTE Gold Member
First and foremost; Welcome to FTE!! Used a role of jute with aluminum backing on the floor, cut approx. 3" short along the edges and then used alum. tape to secure it to the floor, certainly cut down the noise, and although I have never gotten the heater to warm the cab on a cold winter morning, padding on the floor certainly helps. Subsequently installed carpet which cut the sound substantially. Purchased a product made by Evercoat, comes in 12"x!2" petroleum based sheets, simular to thinly rolled tar with a cellophane backing that is remove and suppose to adhere to any surface; warning, strongly suggest not using them, particularly inside door panels!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #12  
cobraguy's Avatar
cobraguy
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 2
From: San Diego CA
Tony, like Dave said jute and carpet will make it so you can carry on a conversation without having to shout. Any of the stick down products are a bi#%h to remove after being there for a while. Welcome to FTE.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #13  
Caruso72's Avatar
Caruso72
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Thanks again. All of this has been helpful.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #14  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Originally Posted by Beechkid
No , professional firefighter, over 500 vehicle fire investigations in my career (documented)- many involved "classic or modified cars" whose owners installed insulation with high levels of petroleum based products....made for a fire that could not be extinguished fast enough due to the rapid spread by onlookers nor professional fire fighters.......well documented & is a part of national standards training for "special hazards- unseen"

second item: "plastic & carbon fiber" body panels- again, you are correct. The mfg's have never realsed the full specifics of the composition as it is considered "proprietary information" even under the hazardous material laws/regulations both at state & federal levels, but, based upon information provided and testdone in both credential labs & field elements it is (and has been for 10+ years) that 1. standard fire fighting protective garmets (turnout boots, pants, coat, hood, helmet, gloves & their vapor barrors) and self contained breathing apparatus do not provide the minimu require personal protection for offensive fire suppression operation involving vehicles mfg with exterior plastic body panels & carbon fiber....This requires a fully encapsulated chemical protective suit with a fire resistive overgarmet (osha & industry standard). In lieu of this, fire fighters may use alternate methods of protection, by standard of practice this includes positining themselves upwind and if necessary employing "power fans" to blow the smoke away from them to engage in offensive operations. The additional hazard is with carbon fiber, although the fire is out there is a residual hazard- particulate matter that becomes airborne (even during transit by the tow service)- that is similar to asbestos with equal/greater hazard. each agency is required to have written policy on how to handle this but in general (as an example) if a aircraft is involved that is made of carbon fiber, that has partially or substantially burned, a "recovery team" is sent in which they essentially wrap the aircraft and all body components in "plastic wrap" prior to transport to contain the particulates.

BTW, all fire fighter protective gear is considered contaminated and require rising with water on the scene prior to departure & secondaly, it must be washed in a "special waahing machine" (which all depts have) upon return to the station.

With hybrids, with the exception of small agencies who do not possess the resources inhouse, I am unaware of any major metro fire department that does not respond 1 hazardous materials response unit with fire suppression resources when any of these vehicles are involved in an accident or other similar type event (fire, etc.)

I won't go into my credentials specifically, but I am recognized as an "expert" both in california & nationally in the field of hazardous substances & chemical related events.
Very familiar with SOP for Haz-Mat.

I even managed to keep my legs intact from flying drive shafts, never stepped on LOX or managed to kill myself in a few flash overs while progressing from Probationary to Chief of Department.

All vehicles have dangers even model T's. First responders are trained as to the dangers and should have written SOP in place, but that does not mean we should not place materials in our personal property for comfort.

Back in my day no one washed their gear as the more ash soot and it smelled the better the rep. Lots has changes since 9-11.

Garbz
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #15  
rusbukt's Avatar
rusbukt
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 602
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA.
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
OEM = Original Equipment Manufacturer: FoMoCo.

Roll the windows up, remove the door access panels, look inside and you will see: black petroleum based undercoating used as sound deadener smeared on the door.

No EPA back then. This is the same stinky goop (when first applied, smells like a dead fish) dealers and gas stations used to spray on undercarriages of vehicles to prevent rust.
AHHHH !! That new truck smell !!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robengel
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Jul 23, 2019 02:04 PM
VanGo
Aerostar
10
Dec 14, 2007 08:32 AM
Imdok
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Oct 19, 2007 10:16 PM
ejfitco
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Jan 26, 2005 12:22 PM
Jim VA.
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Jul 6, 2003 09:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE