1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

DP-Tuner "stock" less than Ford stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-07-2012, 06:27 PM
ScaldedDog's Avatar
ScaldedDog
ScaldedDog is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sedalia, CO
Posts: 1,362
Received 106 Likes on 66 Posts
DP-Tuner "stock" less than Ford stock?

Local diesel emissions place claims my Excursion is only developing 210hp, when last year it was over 260, in "stock" tune. Smoke this year was 3%, last year it was 5%. This year I have a live tuned F5, last year *I think* I had the chip out. I did a little test today and the stock tune will get up to 19-20psi of boost pressure, in the same place my live-tuned 60e will develop 23-25psi. The truck runs fine, I think, in the 60e and tow tunes. Stock tune seems like a slug, but don't they all?

Does it make any sense that DP's stock tune would be substantially less powerful than the OEM stock? (PMT2, if that matters)

A couple of things:

1) I live at 5400ft which lowers boost a bit, compared to you flatlanders.
2) This shop uses emissions testing to sell stuff. (e.g. They marked my oil condition as "poor". It's Rotella T6 with 5300 miles on it. I'm guessing it's fine.)

Mark
 
  #2  
Old 07-07-2012, 06:57 PM
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
F350-6 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
How are they determining the power level? Do they put the truck on a dyno for the emissions test? If so, is it calibrated correctly?
 
  #3  
Old 07-07-2012, 07:12 PM
ScaldedDog's Avatar
ScaldedDog
ScaldedDog is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sedalia, CO
Posts: 1,362
Received 106 Likes on 66 Posts
They do put it on a dyno, but who knows how well its calibrated.

Mark
 
  #4  
Old 07-07-2012, 11:34 PM
GonzoCSU's Avatar
GonzoCSU
GonzoCSU is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Hampton, IA
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would your stock tune be a Modified stock because of the T500? I know my stock tune is not exactly "stock" because it compensates for the ss injectors.
 
  #5  
Old 07-08-2012, 12:58 AM
jkidd_39's Avatar
jkidd_39
jkidd_39 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not to be rude but who cares what stock is doing?

I can't remember the last time I was in stock...
 
  #6  
Old 07-08-2012, 04:13 AM
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Tugly is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia River
Posts: 18,797
Received 111 Likes on 66 Posts
I use stock on every drive.
  • It's quieter in resedential neighborhoods where there are steep hills.
  • I can hear the whistle better when in town.
If the truck is "weaker" in stock this year with the differences you listed, there is more than one possible explanation:
  • The DP stock tune could be weaker in your truck than the tune on your PCM. The DP stock is a copy of the original tune, with adjustments to the shifts to make it healthier for the transmission. This alone could make a HP difference, but I don't know enough to say. Unless you are the original owner, it's also possible the PCM was reflashed at some point in its life, so it wouldn't be original stock.
  • Something may be a bit "off" with the truck since your last emission test. HPOP, EBP, MAP sensor, injectors, etc....
  • A dyno day was conducted near me not long ago, and the numbers coming out of that machine sounded absurd to me and a few other members. If the dyno was correct, I could assume I'm getting near 400 HP with the configuration in my sig. I don't think so on so many levels. If that machine can be that far off, what's 50 HP in calibration difference? Maybe the machine is calibrated now, but it wasn't a year ago. Maybe it was 25 HP high last year and 25HP low this year. 210 HP in stock at your elevation is not completely out of reason. 230-235 is even more reasonable for both dynos.
$0.02
 
  #7  
Old 07-08-2012, 08:14 AM
4EXTRDR's Avatar
4EXTRDR
4EXTRDR is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can tell you from tuning my Grand National the different types (manufacturers) of dyno's can easily make a difference in your RWHP...was it a Mustang dyno by any chance?? Their known as the "heartbreaker" dyno's because they give very humble numbers Also, was the emissions center really doing a full pull in 3rd gear to test for max HP? Maybe last year they gave it a true pull!
 
  #8  
Old 07-08-2012, 09:45 AM
ScaldedDog's Avatar
ScaldedDog
ScaldedDog is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sedalia, CO
Posts: 1,362
Received 106 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by jkidd_39
not to be rude but who cares what stock is doing?

I can't remember the last time I was in stock...
Not rude at all. Strictly speaking, I don't care, either, unless it's a data point that tells me something else about how the truck is working. My original thought was that DP's stock might be different than Ford's, though that doesn't look to be the case, other than changes for the BTS, etc.

Originally Posted by Tugly
If the truck is "weaker" in stock this year with the differences you listed, there is more than one possible explanation:
  • The DP stock tune could be weaker in your truck than the tune on your PCM. The DP stock is a copy of the original tune, with adjustments to the shifts to make it healthier for the transmission. This alone could make a HP difference, but I don't know enough to say. Unless you are the original owner, it's also possible the PCM was reflashed at some point in its life, so it wouldn't be original stock.
  • Something may be a bit "off" with the truck since your last emission test. HPOP, EBP, MAP sensor, injectors, etc....
  • A dyno day was conducted near me not long ago, and the numbers coming out of that machine sounded absurd to me and a few other members. If the dyno was correct, I could assume I'm getting near 400 HP with the configuration in my sig. I don't think so on so many levels. If that machine can be that far off, what's 50 HP in calibration difference? Maybe the machine is calibrated now, but it wasn't a year ago. Maybe it was 25 HP high last year and 25HP low this year. 210 HP in stock at your elevation is not completely out of reason. 230-235 is even more reasonable for both dynos.
$0.02
It is possible the old stock wasn't really stock, as the original owner used a HTIII programmer, which I didn't get. I think the program was removed, though, as the overhead mileage display was dead on for the 60K miles prior to adding the chip.

I don't know the emissions testing protocol, but I thought of one other change since last year that might have had an effect: I used AE to recalibrate my speedometer, as the tires I had on was causing it to read about 3mph slow at 75mph. If they are using the speedo, they will have less fuel at the same indicated speed than last year, and that would translate into less power and less smoke.

Of, course, dyno accuracy can't be discounted. The testing here is such a joke that a dyno could be off by a lot and have no effect on pass/fail rates.

Mark
 
  #9  
Old 07-08-2012, 12:18 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,450
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
To the best of my knowledge when you have a "stock" tune, it just sets it in a copy of the ford PCM. Perhaps your actual PCM and the "copy" on your chip are different. Your PCM might be an updated version. Over the years Ford did up the HP on the 7.3,
 
  #10  
Old 07-08-2012, 01:44 PM
HKusp's Avatar
HKusp
HKusp is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Perry Hall, Maryland.
Posts: 7,760
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Jody definitely used to make changes to stock. I have been out of the loop for a while, but I would be shocked to find out that he is NOT changing his stock tune. That being said, my stock tune seems like it has more power and much better shifting than the original 2003 programming.
 
  #11  
Old 07-08-2012, 03:54 PM
Ponyboychris's Avatar
Ponyboychris
Ponyboychris is offline
Hit it!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Centennial CO
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by HKusp
Jody definitely used to make changes to stock. I have been out of the loop for a while, but I would be shocked to find out that he is NOT changing his stock tune. That being said, my stock tune seems like it has more power and much better shifting than the original 2003 programming.
My stock tune behaves the same way. And I have to do the yearly emissions dance as well. It always passes with flying colors.
 
  #12  
Old 07-08-2012, 10:37 PM
ScaldedDog's Avatar
ScaldedDog
ScaldedDog is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sedalia, CO
Posts: 1,362
Received 106 Likes on 66 Posts
Chris, do you have yours tested in stock tune, or another one? IIRC, the opacity limit is 30%, and mine is always around 5% or less in stock. Had I thought about it, I'd have had them test my DD tune.

Mark
 
  #13  
Old 07-08-2012, 11:09 PM
GonzoCSU's Avatar
GonzoCSU
GonzoCSU is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Hampton, IA
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always had my emissions test done at Schwinzell's Diesel in Fort Collins and I never saw a HP number on the sheet.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joeyd61
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
63
09-12-2013 10:07 AM
Pocket
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
17
04-27-2011 01:59 PM
weekendwarriorfsw32
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
29
04-14-2011 06:49 PM
dereksbronco79
Illinois Chapter
2
01-19-2011 07:19 PM



Quick Reply: DP-Tuner "stock" less than Ford stock?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.