Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Program 12B34 reference fuel mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2012 | 06:17 PM
  #1  
sandyc's Avatar
sandyc
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 237
Likes: 2
From: South Texas
Program 12B34 reference fuel mileage?

Ever since I got the Customer Satisfaction Program 12B34, my fuel mileage went down. I use to get 11 +/- when pulling my 14K 5ver and 17 to 19 non-towing. I've dropped at least 2 mpg on towing and non-towing.

The dealer said I need the flash no matter if my truck runs good with no problems. So, I got it and can tell absolutely no difference other than crappie fuel mileage.

Has anyone else experienced this situation.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2012 | 07:43 PM
  #2  
BeatMarti's Avatar
BeatMarti
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
I am actually quite pleased with 12B34

12B34 is for the chassis-cab truck (F450/F550) with the conventional turbo.

I updated it a couple of days and 250 miles ago. Sure, not a lot of miles to show a significant difference in mileage. It feels as it might have gone down a little but the jury is still out.

However, I very much like the much improved shifting and better dead-start response. Dead start acceleration is responding quicker and once taking off, a lot more "measured". I used to wait for seconds on a green light with no activity and then just about leaving rubber. Now, it starts quicker and smoother.

Shifting is more "aggressive" (slightly higher shift points) and that is most likely where the fuel mileage drop (if any) comes from. I also noticed a change in "power curve". It seems more "peaky" starting from about 2300 RPM up, but feels like less power below that. I also noticed that the turbo boost has gone up by about 2 psi. I now regularly reach/peak at 28 psi during acceleration.

Another interesting change is the downshift during slow deceleration approaching a red light or whatever while in NORMAL transmission mode. I noticed that based on SPEED (not RPM) the tranny shifts down from 6-5-4-3-2-1 which is great because if for example the light turns green and you want to accelerate, it is already in the correct gear. That one is new to me and I sure like it.

I believe they moved down the de-fuel point reacting to exhaust temperatures that may be a bit lower than before. That would make sense since one of the items they tried to fix is turbo blade failures.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2012 | 08:41 PM
  #3  
hay is for horses's Avatar
hay is for horses
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BeatMarti
12B34 is for the chassis-cab truck (F450/F550) with the conventional turbo.

I updated it a couple of days and 250 miles ago. Sure, not a lot of miles to show a significant difference in mileage. It feels as it might have gone down a little but the jury is still out.

However, I very much like the much improved shifting and better dead-start response. Dead start acceleration is responding quicker and once taking off, a lot more "measured". I used to wait for seconds on a green light with no activity and then just about leaving rubber. Now, it starts quicker and smoother.

Shifting is more "aggressive" (slightly higher shift points) and that is most likely where the fuel mileage drop (if any) comes from. I also noticed a change in "power curve". It seems more "peaky" starting from about 2300 RPM up, but feels like less power below that. I also noticed that the turbo boost has gone up by about 2 psi. I now regularly reach/peak at 28 psi during acceleration.

Another interesting change is the downshift during slow deceleration approaching a red light or whatever while in NORMAL transmission mode. I noticed that based on SPEED (not RPM) the tranny shifts down from 6-5-4-3-2-1 which is great because if for example the light turns green and you want to accelerate, it is already in the correct gear. That one is new to me and I sure like it.

I believe they moved down the de-fuel point reacting to exhaust temperatures that may be a bit lower than before. That would make sense since one of the items they tried to fix is turbo blade failures.
This tsb also is for f350 chassis cab and mine goes in on Monday. I have been discussing this recal with another member who had it done on a chassis cab and he has noticed no difference in fuel or truck behavior. I will update when mine is done.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2012 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
Cable Guy's Avatar
Cable Guy
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
I seem to have lost a little over 1 mpg after the update, but it could just be my driving habits. When I first brought the truck home I got about 18 on a 7+ hour drive home. I was working out of town and on flat land in North Carolina and was averaging 16-17. Now I am back home in the hills of Tennessee and am getting about 14.5-15. I really drove it gently when I first bought it, but now I drive it like I own it. Anyway, after the flash it seems to run better, but I do believe I lost about 1 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 11:07 AM
  #5  
BeatMarti's Avatar
BeatMarti
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hay is for horses
This tsb also is for f350 chassis cab and mine goes in on Monday. I have been discussing this recal with another member who had it done on a chassis cab and he has noticed no difference in fuel or truck behavior. I will update when mine is done.
12B34 is for chassis-cab only. Pickup configurations receive the 12B33 update which appears to be a lot more extensive. See reference to 12B34 by Ford:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B33...WRTY0FKQWxhd00
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
nissankidd's Avatar
nissankidd
Freshman User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
I lost about 1-1.5 mpg after the reflash. Not thrilled at all.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2012 | 09:35 PM
  #7  
kper05's Avatar
kper05
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,600
Likes: 83
Club FTE Silver Member

I've only burned almost one tank so I still need to do more testing.

I am at 13.5 most of the time and I'm at 12.6 currently after the flash on Monday.
So, same driving conditions and less MPG so yes mine seems worse but I need to burn a few tanks before I consider this an issue.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2012 | 08:34 AM
  #8  
AMEC Electric LLC's Avatar
AMEC Electric LLC
More Turbo
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 635
Likes: 13
From: Mt. Salem, NJ
Mine was about 1 mpg better but has leveled off to where it was pre-flash. The dead-stop response and overall acceleration is worlds better. Towing mpg is 1 mpg better...go figure?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bribricanton
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
30
May 18, 2014 06:27 PM
MC5C
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Jul 25, 2012 09:52 AM
Hank85713
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Jan 7, 2008 05:40 PM
olfordsnstone
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Dec 2, 2006 01:30 AM
Jozey
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
Dec 10, 2003 11:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE