When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
this compressor is supposed to have extended tip, just like bw
also 11 full blades, no splitter blades.
as for the turbine, the blades are not straight like the original ats turbo, there is a bit of a twist to them as well as being shorter towards the outside and longer(farther down stream) towards the center. not sure if that is what you mean by j hook or not
you might look into them and see what you think if you haven't.
i do know that i probably need the t4 housing though...
this compressor is supposed to have extended tip, just like bw
also 11 full blades, no splitter blades.
as for the turbine, the blades are not straight like the original ats turbo, there is a bit of a twist to them as well as being shorter towards the outside and longer(farther down stream) towards the center. not sure if that is what you mean by j hook or not
you might look into them and see what you think if you haven't.
i do know that i probably need the t4 housing though...
Go take a pic of your turbine and compressor wheels for me and post them in here....
Ah, thats a nicer charger than what I was thinking. Here is the problem though.... That thing is capable of 65lb/min max, which is impressive for its size. However, its built to do that at very high pressure ratios... up in the 3.5 range. Down in the range I think you will be running it, you're looking at about 50lb/min in the peak efficiency...... Its a good looking charger, just too small, and too narrow of a compressor map.
Here are pictures of my charger, you will see the drastic differences in the wheel designs:
how is my dad's ats kit running 27psi all the way up the rpm band? the stock cam?
you would need 80lbs per minute to run 20 lbs of boost at full rpm with 100% efficiency right?
how is my dad's ats kit running 27psi all the way up the rpm band? the stock cam?
you would need 80lbs per minute to run 20 lbs of boost at full rpm with 100% efficiency right?
Boost is a measure of restriction. His ATS unit is WAAAAAY out of its efficiency range, stock cam, and a crappy turbo kit are the culprit.
Boost means almost nothing... except in this case high restriction.......lb/min is flow, and what matters.
right, i understand that. but that being said is there anywhere to get a cfm meter that we could put on these trucks?
you can get a shaft speed meter, then look at the compressor map. I'm shocked your dads turbo hasn't smoked itself..... there is absolutely nothing to gain on that charger between 20 and 27psi...20 is even pushing it.....
It would be more beneficial to run 20psi with a funtional wastegate than 27psi with it locked.
what is your target lbs/minute?
Don't have one.
i wonder how this thing will run at 20 lbs with 21.5:1 comp and the "torque" cam? think she will hold?
The torque cam wont do much of anything for lowering drive pressure/reversion, but I see no reason why a 7.3 can't do 20psi.
i know what you mean, but there is no bark or any real hints that it's about to die(keep in mind that it doesn't normally go over about 20 psi. his waster gate is functional, it will open at 27 (i think he has actually had it a tiny bit higher once but cranked it back down)
how much it the "turbo" cam? i just want to make sure i still have a good dd and pretty good fuel mileage as long as i am out of the peddle.
The turbo cam will be good on a DD. Racin is running between 20-25psi on his with that cam and the Comp 910s. That setup will be pretty comparable to yours. I also thought you were doing a complete rebuild? Why is your target boost so low? I thought your aim was closer to 300hp?
i don't know
full rebuild yes but i don't know if i should slap this turbo on there and be happy (since it seems that we still haven't a pump that can supply us reliably. or am i wrong here?)
and i want to keep the comp as high as possible for fuel economy(the intended purpose of my truck was to be a fuel economic/reliably transport/with some pep)
I would run the turbo you have at the most boost you can get with the stock IP until we do get more reliable high power IP. Both Racin and NMB2 in conjunction with their pump builder are working on the fuel issue and I am quite sure they will get up to the desired fuel level reliably. As for the amount of boost, we can run roughly 32psi and be at roughly the same dynamic compression ratio Justin is at when he pushing 40psi. I calculated on a dynamic compression ratio calculator and that is what I came up with. Granted there are more vaiables than it calculated into it but it gave me a rough estimate.
After I get my truck to Cali, I want to run it at 30psi after I get head studs and see if it ever does grenade and if it does I will do a full build after that. On my build, I will use 7.3 turbo rods and pistons and fully balance everything plus whatever else I can do to make it reliable at higher boost. On top of that I will cryo treat the rods and pistons too to add a bit more strength. After that I would think that it would take the abuse of close to 35psi.
Another thing I forgot to mention is that I will keep the compression ratio at 21.5:1 to see if the engine can handle it. It will be at that compression ratio right now and after the build. I'm really interested in finding the limitations of the Idi cus I think they can handle more power than most think...
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.