Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

modifying proportioning valve for rear disc?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
hasteranger's Avatar
hasteranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 11
From: West Virginia
modifying proportioning valve for rear disc?

I've seen several posts in searches where people talk about drilling out the residual valve on the proportioning valve, but I cannot find anywhere that actually shows where the residual valve is or how to drill it out.

Basically, from reading the forum posts, there is a 10 lb residual valve on the rear lines, which retains about 10 lbs of pressure on your rear line even when you are not using the brakes. I've heard if you keep this with discs, it will lightly rub the pads against the rotors at all times, wearing them prematurely and possible glazing them over.

Some people on here report going to discs and making no changes and being fine with it, and in fact I called jeff's bronco graveyard about their disc swap and he said they recommend leaving the valve alone but installing an adjuster in line adjust the rear line pressure to make sure the rears don't lock up before the fronts. He said most people just run as is.

Anyone have any experience either way?
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 06:43 PM
  #2  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Experience? You bet.

I did an SSBC disc brake retrofit on my 65 Stang and am using a Wilwood prop valve. On the 68 Stang, it has a Granada swap with disc/drum combo valve/booster/ MC from Master Power Brakes. On my project 70 Bump, I'm ditching the 78 donor's prop valve and going with a Wilwood prop valve... much simpler to install, relocates it from the inside frame rail to under the MC, and I dont' have to worry about that stupid pin popping out or the internal piston errantly activating the brake light.

Residual valves are only required when the MC is mounted lower than the calipers like in under-floor mounted MCs in some customs and hot rods. In those cases, it's 2 lb for the front discs and a 10 lb for the rear drum brakes.

I would not modify the stock prop valve but rather get rid of it altogether.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
Fordworth's Avatar
Fordworth
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 2
From: Alvarado, TX
I ditched the stock prop valve and ran a Wilwood adjustable on the rear line while the fronts are straight off the MC. It's worked great with both the chevy calipers on the old D60 and now the dual piston calipers on the Sterling.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 07:36 PM
  #4  
82GT's Avatar
82GT
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
I went with the 4 wheel disk proportioning valve from wildhorses4x4

Proportioning Valve - WILD HORSES Early Ford Bronco Parts
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

All rear drum brake master cylinders have a residual valve, regardless of mounted location. It is usually behind the brass press-in fitting in the forward reservoir.

I should say "usually" as I have done 3 different conversions and 1 of the master cylinders did not have the the rubber valve in place.

As was stated you would need a stronger residual valve if the M/C was located lower than the rest of the brake system.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2012 | 09:20 PM
  #6  
hasteranger's Avatar
hasteranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 11
From: West Virginia
I should have mentioned, I like the factory proportioning valve because it has the pin, so if I do lose pressure on one end, I will still keep some bit of pressure on the other end. I'd really like to keep this feature. Besides, my stock one appears to be working ok, so I don't really want to spend money replacing it with an aftermarket one, especially since I'm running all brand new stainless steel hard lines from inline tube that have the factory fittings on them.

82 Gt: The one from iron horse appears to be the same as the one JBG sells, and they told me the '77 bronco one is different than the '78 F150, they said they are not interchangeable and use different size fittings. They put me on hold for like 15 minutes while the 2 guys talked it over and thats what they said. I have 0 experience with early bronco stuff so I have no idea if thats true. From the picture it certainly looks the same.

are you running stock lines?
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 08:22 AM
  #7  
82GT's Avatar
82GT
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by hasteranger
82 Gt: The one from iron horse appears to be the same as the one JBG sells, and they told me the '77 bronco one is different than the '78 F150, they said they are not interchangeable and use different size fittings. They put me on hold for like 15 minutes while the 2 guys talked it over and thats what they said. I have 0 experience with early bronco stuff so I have no idea if thats true. From the picture it certainly looks the same.

are you running stock lines?
Yep, stock lines, the only change was for the dashboard brake light switch, the old was a two wire, the new a one wire, but it had instuctions on how to wire it up.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
Herr Geist's Avatar
Herr Geist
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Maybe I missed it, but what kind of MC do you need to get to replace the stock MC designed for rear drums?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 10:37 PM
  #9  
hasteranger's Avatar
hasteranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 11
From: West Virginia
Apparently, according to the "experts" at jbg and a few other people on the forums, many people run the stock disc/drum mc and prop valve and it works just fine for their disc swap. Even when changing the prop valve I think most people leave the mc stock. There may be a difference in the older drum/drum mc's, in fact, I'm betting that there is. Again, from what I've read, most people that are upgrading try to get their booster and MC off a 79 F350, as they claim this is the strongest. IIRC, the 79 F350 sticks out a bit more as well. Its got a thicker booster.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 10:40 PM
  #10  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by hasteranger
Apparently, according to the "experts" at jbg and a few other people on the forums, many people run the stock disc/drum mc and prop valve and it works just fine for their disc swap. Even when changing the prop valve I think most people leave the mc stock. There may be a difference in the older drum/drum mc's, in fact, I'm betting that there is. Again, from what I've read, most people that are upgrading try to get their booster and MC off a 79 F350, as they claim this is the strongest. IIRC, the 79 F350 sticks out a bit more as well. Its got a thicker booster.
For my rear disk swaps I used the aluminum 80's Ford Ranger disk/drum master cylinder and changed or added nothing else. No aftermarket prop valves, no residual valves etc.

And I only used the Ranger master cylinders for the somewhat "bling" factor of the aluminum.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 10:44 PM
  #11  
Fordworth's Avatar
Fordworth
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 2
From: Alvarado, TX
I've always used the stock 75 MC and it works must fine. The hydrobooster has made the single improvement in stopping power, though.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #12  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Fordworth
I've always used the stock 75 MC and it works must fine. The hydrobooster has made the single improvement in stopping power, though.
X2 on hydroboost. Huge improvement in stopping.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2012 | 01:18 AM
  #13  
Herr Geist's Avatar
Herr Geist
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
I'd love to go hydroboost but aren't there concerns here with what the stock power steering pump can handle? Also, if my pump blows, I'm out of brakes. Not sure how I feel about this.
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2012 | 08:31 AM
  #14  
hasteranger's Avatar
hasteranger
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 11
From: West Virginia
which hydroboost did you guys use? My local junkyard has started getting in medium duty trucks and there are a ton of hydroboosts to choose from. What I found is that a number of them appear to work opposite of the stock ford booster, in that the pedals are set up so there is a pivot between the pedal and the rod to the booster, so pulling the rod OUT towards the driver is what actuates the booster! Weird setup. I did find one off a late 80's maybe early 90's box chevy 3500 box truck that I will have to drill the firewall to install, but uses the same bolt pattern as my stock MC. Idk, I've done a lot of reading up on other conversions but haven't seen a whole lot for specific installs on the 70's ford trucks. Do you guys have any links to the set up you used or install threads? I'd love to see em!
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
ChaseTruck754's Avatar
ChaseTruck754
Lead Driver
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 15
From: Costa Mesa, CA
The F-450 trucks from the late 90's into the 2000's and then the super-dookie trucks are what is used most I believe. My units are both off 2000-2001 super-dookies. Chevy astro van units are also popular, but any unit can pretty much be made to work. There's quite a few threads on here already about the hydro swaps.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE