Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

2005 conversion DONE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2012 | 01:03 PM
  #31  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
Thread Starter
|
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by jshalala
sweet man good luck. Lemme know what you use to get the fan clutch nut off lol
My problem before was holding the pulley, 4 bold heads is a very stupid way to hold a pulley IMO.

So I am going to use something like this to bolt the pulley somewhere so it wont move, then use a bigolhonkin* wrench on the nut.



* - bigolhonkin is a ukranian word for large.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #32  
dn29626's Avatar
dn29626
Cargo Master
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,500
Likes: 14
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by CSIPSD
6.0... Better injectors, better turbo, more HP stock, better tranny, more comforts, better front end and on and on and on...

6.4... Well duh, happens to be the best diesel in a light truck on the road right now

6.7... Time will tell, but leaps and bounds above the 7.3, in EVERY SINGLE RESPECT...
You are the first person i can remember say the 6.0 has better injectors.
Never heard that 6.4 comment either.
The 6.7 is a time will tell.

All my fellow members, thank you for your comments.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 10:03 AM
  #33  
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
Originally Posted by CSIPSD
6.0... Better injectors, better turbo, more HP stock, better tranny, more comforts, better front end and on and on and on...

6.4... Well duh, happens to be the best diesel in a light truck on the road right now

6.7... Time will tell, but leaps and bounds above the 7.3, in EVERY SINGLE RESPECT...

I'd have to disagree with all that. But we all have opinions.

Wouldn't give up my 7.3 for any of those!
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 10:16 AM
  #34  
gatormccluskey's Avatar
gatormccluskey
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Trey >> Nice job. 6.0 better than a 7.3 ! ? I never heard such a thing. Weed will make them say strange things.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 05:39 PM
  #35  
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 13,484
Likes: 42
From: Stevens Point, WI
Originally Posted by Snowseeker
I'd have to disagree with all that. But we all have opinions.

Wouldn't give up my 7.3 for any of those!

I will say I like the 05-07 front ends a bit better, I'll agree to that.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 11:13 PM
  #36  
nookiemonster55's Avatar
nookiemonster55
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Mississippi
Originally Posted by CSIPSD
6.0... Better injectors, better turbo, more HP stock, better tranny, more comforts, better front end and on and on and on...

6.4... Well duh, happens to be the best diesel in a light truck on the road right now

6.7... Time will tell, but leaps and bounds above the 7.3, in EVERY SINGLE RESPECT...
YEP including price
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #37  
BadDogKuzz's Avatar
BadDogKuzz
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 4
From: Gary,Indiana
Originally Posted by CSIPSD
6.0... Better injectors, better turbo, more HP stock, better tranny, more comforts, better front end and on and on and on...

6.4... Well duh, happens to be the best diesel in a light truck on the road right now

6.7... Time will tell, but leaps and bounds above the 7.3, in EVERY SINGLE RESPECT...
Well I hope we can a agree to disagree. And this just my thoughts on that statement.
First of all a more advanced part does not always make it better. Case in point the 6.0 turbo sure when it works right it is better than a STOCK 7.3 turbo. I don't think it better than a H2E on a 7.3. And don't you run a H2E? So you would know better than on I on that one.

And Yes they all make more HP from the factory but they all have "Clean Air" crap on them and to remove it you are breaking the law. Now my E99 only had a cat on it. I still have it but forgot to put it back on?!? So if Indiana ever does like CA as far as smog stuff. The 7.3 is a safer bet.

And lastly I have friends with 6.0, 6.4 and all they do complain about the mileage they get. And I just say well my old 7.3 gets better around town mileage than they get on the highway. And city 14.4 mpg and 18.2 highway on a stock tunes. And I'll hopefully improve on that with the lastest modds I have done.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2012 | 05:46 AM
  #38  
microdevil45's Avatar
microdevil45
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: Plant City
Hey trey this is what I did to keep the pulley from moving while I used the wrench on the nut. Worked great the pulley didn't move. Strap wrench was a no go can't hold with one hand while trying to pull the wrench with the other.



Attached the ratchet strap to the underside of the alt looped around the pulley and attached to the frame on the other side by the headlight. Tightened it down and bam no problem then just released the strap when done and off it came. Hope it helps.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/p...ictureid=95461
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/p...ictureid=95460
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 03:43 AM
  #39  
primetime1267's Avatar
primetime1267
New User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, Florida
The new front end looks amazing!! It is on my bucket list for sure.. Now if I have already cut behind my stock headlights to make the 05 Harley lights work, I wouldn't need the new header panel, right?
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 03:44 AM
  #40  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
Thread Starter
|
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by primetime1267
The new front end looks amazing!! It is on my bucket list for sure.. Now if I have already cut behind my stock headlights to make the 05 Harley lights work, I wouldn't need the new header panel, right?
Well, the new grille wont really fit right with out one.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 06:42 AM
  #41  
primetime1267's Avatar
primetime1267
New User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, Florida
But aren't guys using this same grill on our trucks with a little trimming on the bottom of the grill.??
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #42  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
Thread Starter
|
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by primetime1267
But aren't guys using this same grill on our trucks with a little trimming on the bottom of the grill.??
You can do that if you keep the 99-04 bumper.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #43  
CSIPSD's Avatar
CSIPSD
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 2
From: Bend, OR
Originally Posted by BadDogKuzz
Well I hope we can a agree to disagree. And this just my thoughts on that statement.
First of all a more advanced part does not always make it better. Case in point the 6.0 turbo sure when it works right it is better than a STOCK 7.3 turbo. I don't think it better than a H2E on a 7.3. And don't you run a H2E? So you would know better than on I on that one.

And Yes they all make more HP from the factory but they all have "Clean Air" crap on them and to remove it you are breaking the law. Now my E99 only had a cat on it. I still have it but forgot to put it back on?!? So if Indiana ever does like CA as far as smog stuff. The 7.3 is a safer bet.

And lastly I have friends with 6.0, 6.4 and all they do complain about the mileage they get. And I just say well my old 7.3 gets better around town mileage than they get on the highway. And city 14.4 mpg and 18.2 highway on a stock tunes. And I'll hopefully improve on that with the lastest modds I have done.
The 6.0 Turbo is not NEARLY the problem most think it is... the only time people come to a website like this is when they have an issue. I know of 20 6.0 fleet trucks, most have never been in the shop for anything other then normal maintenance (glow plugs, water pumps and such) and get worked hard...

The 6.4 with simple deletes can get you in the 18-20 mpg range for real, not the BS claims that 7.3 drivers tell you that they get 18-22mpg... Come on...

6.7, well as I said, time will tell. I don't think it will ever be a HP king, but who buys a 70k truck to try and do that...

I love the 7.3, hell I have a 7.3L injector tattooed on my arm, but I happen to be a realist about facts, every year these trucks get better and better and better. There has never been a year when they got worse.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 02:55 PM
  #44  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
Thread Starter
|
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by CSIPSD
There has never been a year when they got worse.
I agree with this statement. Like he said, you dont hear anything about the (literally) MILLIONS of trucks that never have problems.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rymac320
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
2
Jan 3, 2011 08:22 AM
gearloose1
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
30
May 21, 2010 09:22 PM
PSD6litre40
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
9
Jun 7, 2004 10:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.