Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

6.0 reliability and longevity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
Jason Szotko's Avatar
Jason Szotko
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
6.0 reliability and longevity

Seriously considering moving from my chevy 2500 6.0 gasser to a diesel truck. The chevy is rusting out badly and only gets 10mpg at the most due to the 4:11 towing gears, so I am wanting to upgrade slightly. This truck would be used daily for my HVAC business so reliability and longevity are a serious concern. My budget really only allows for a purchase of a used diesel around at least 6 or 7 years old. I really like the looks and performance of the Ford super duty, but I have been told by a few people to stay away from the 6.0 diesel. I am looking for opinions about trucks/engines of this era. I don't want to make a purchase of something that can turn into a nightmare of repairs and down time. Not looking to mod this truck, just wanting a solid reliable daily driver that can handle my job trailer and tools. Any advice on what to look for or expect in a truck around 2005 to 2007 with around 75k to 125k miles on it. Thanks for any help.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
Maxium4x4's Avatar
Maxium4x4
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,103
Likes: 3,926
From: Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
Welcome to FTE Jason Since you will not be towing hundreds of miles and for a business, I would look at the V-10 to be honest. If you want a diesel, check the history through OASIS at the Ford dealer. OASIS will show any warranty repairs that were performed, out of warranty would be buyer beware.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 06:08 PM
  #3  
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
Post Fiend
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 32
From: N. Fort Worth, tx
Club FTE Silver Member

your on a diesel site about fords, on a forum about 6.0's . most of us love them but there may be a bias do to the above.
all diesels in the 6.0 eara have issues. as well as the next gen engines. the one currently doing the best are the latist and greatist.
as far as ford/navastar goes IMO the 6.0 is the less of all evils. I personal love mine and its been good to me.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 06:23 PM
  #4  
69cj's Avatar
69cj
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13,833
Likes: 24
From: Middle Tn.
Two words, statements, of caution. The 6.0 does not like short grocery getter type trips. It is also mandatory to strictly adhere to maint. schedules and use only OEM filters and recommended fluids. It loves to work hard and hates to loaf around. Think about how your going to use her.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:18 PM
  #5  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
The biggest thing about the 6.0s that will help you in reliability is become familiar with the newer diesels. The 6.0 has the least amount of "new" tech and it's only going to get worse with later engines.

I still maintain the belief that the worst enemy with the 6.0 is ignorance. Either owner or tech.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:53 PM
  #6  
Maxium4x4's Avatar
Maxium4x4
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,103
Likes: 3,926
From: Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
The guys are being realistic and telling you straight up. The 6.0L is a good engine once you understand how to maintain and use it. The HVAC business is not really about towing across the country and heavy hauling.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:55 PM
  #7  
05 f250 6 inch lift's Avatar
05 f250 6 inch lift
Elder User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
I think the 6.0L is a great engine. It does have it short coming but they are fixable. An if it's maintained properly it will last ALONG time. One guy on here posted a picture of his odometer. It showed 500,000 miles an still running strong.

If your looking for a low maintains daily driver. You may want to look at a 7.3L.
But whatever you do get. Stuff will always break an need fixing no matter what you drive.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
miner999r's Avatar
miner999r
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 6
From: Alberta
I should have got a gas powered truck. I thought I would do more camper / trailer towing but plans didn't work out. These motors or any modern diesel in my opinion are made for working and putting on lots of miles in a short period of time. My truck runs great but very minimal short trips, mostly highway with relatively long / speedy runs and I avoid idling like the plague. So I have a nice truck but it is not the proper truck for my use. Love the power and decent fuel economy - really love it with a load and pulling.

40 years in the mines - I guess I have to do another 10.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #9  
jdhart73's Avatar
jdhart73
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Why does everyone always say avoid short trips and idling? These engines are used on worksites all over the place idling for long periods and short drives here and there.... put a high idle mod on it if the idle bothers you and I just don't see how short trips are going to expedite the possible failure. Anyone have proof of these things causing issues?
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:35 PM
  #10  
bismic's Avatar
bismic
Fleet Owner
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 27,792
Likes: 3,542
Club FTE Gold Member
Ford has done a LOT of software upgrades to try to improve the 6.0L reliability. MANY of these addressed things like the EGR valve operation at idle, the turbo vanes cycling when starting up and idling, etc. All if this is because it is absolutely a fact that carbon is generated (incomplete combustion) when the engine is not fully up to temp. Excessive carbon in the turbo can cause the vanes to stick and an overboost to occur. Carbon in the EGR system can cause the EGR valve to hang up and can further magnify poor combustion issues. Carbon in the intake can cause other problems.

Bottom line is that the EGR system and VGT system has made it more important to operate your engine at proper temperatures vs frequent short trips. How many issues and the severity will vary, but it is BEST to operate these trucks on long trips when fully heat saturated.

Also - this 2006 6.0L has been the best truck I have owned. Been very reliable (at 110k miles).
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
Frankenbiker's Avatar
Frankenbiker
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 3
The problematic items are the vanes in the turbo, and the EGR valve, if the engine in question still has it.

The turbo vanes tend to stick if not driven fairly hard. The exhaust side of the turbo doesn't get hot enough to burn off the excess carbon from unburnt fuel, and the vanes either stick in place, or if they don't hard-stick, they suffer from a severely reduced range of motion. If the vanes stick closed, the engine suffers from an overboost condition; if they stick open, it suffers from an underboost condition.

The EGR valve will also become covered in the same unburnt fuel and get gummed up. Then it sticks open, giving continuous EGR feed when not requested.

Documented multiple times here, with pics.

Even if you DO drive many short trips, one long and hot trip per week will go a long way towards absolving your engine of the short-trip sins.

The 6.0 is the first in the "This is not your Father's Diesel Engine" line of engines under the new EPA regs of 2000+.

Long gone are the days when you could expect the engine to happily burn whatever crap you came across, going 20K miles on an oil change and never so much as burping, much less having injector or turbo issues. If you're not OCD (or close) on maintenance, you probably won't be happy with a 6.0.

-blaine
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:44 PM
  #12  
Benchwrench's Avatar
Benchwrench
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 7
From: Circle City
Comparing the competition and knowing what I know now about the 6 liter, I'd buy another in a New York minute
You get so much truck for the buck. (this is coming from a former 7.3 powerstroke owner.)
I had more issues with my old 7.3L in the first 36k mi. than to date with this 6.0.
Welcome to the 6.0 forum, Jason.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:47 PM
  #13  
m-chan68's Avatar
m-chan68
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 255
From: Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Club FTE Silver Member

I agree with everything posted by Frankenbiker down to the tee.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:56 PM
  #14  
jdhart73's Avatar
jdhart73
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Thanks for the tutorial, a lot of good info!

So lets assume short trip driver and frequent idler have deleted the EGR and have an aftermarket turbo installed.... any better now or still issues?
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:57 PM
  #15  
Fulthrotl's Avatar
Fulthrotl
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 904
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Jason Szotko
Seriously considering moving from my chevy 2500 6.0 gasser to a diesel truck. The chevy is rusting out badly and only gets 10mpg at the most due to the 4:11 towing gears, so I am wanting to upgrade slightly. This truck would be used daily for my HVAC business so reliability and longevity are a serious concern. My budget really only allows for a purchase of a used diesel around at least 6 or 7 years old. I really like the looks and performance of the Ford super duty, but I have been told by a few people to stay away from the 6.0 diesel. I am looking for opinions about trucks/engines of this era. I don't want to make a purchase of something that can turn into a nightmare of repairs and down time. Not looking to mod this truck, just wanting a solid reliable daily driver that can handle my job trailer and tools. Any advice on what to look for or expect in a truck around 2005 to 2007 with around 75k to 125k miles on it. Thanks for any help.
as a sparky talking to a tin knocker, i'd look at the V-10.

my 2006 went without a hiccup for 91K miles. then, well, it didn't go
so well. i just changed fluids at intervals, not knowing that there are
some very small mistakes that can be made unwittingly that have huge
consequences.

my pass thru the engine, fixing it so it'll run the rest of the time i
need a work van, was a smidge over $10,000

few months out of warranty. the bill was all mine.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.