When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Agreed, these fine men of the auto world most certainly saved Ford's bacon. Mulally was no less than a visionary when Ford began shuttering plants and pairing off it's assets.
But, how much is enough? I don't begrudge anyone from earning all that they can but is anyone really worth 29 Million?
Our most junior Navy Seals are earning less than 25K per year. Our highest paid flag officers are earning less than 150K per year.
Perhaps the cost of our goods could be a little less with slightly lower compensation packages for the top execs.
I have heard it explained in a way that makes some twisted sense: A CEO is a CEO is a CEO. The field doesn't matter, the guy at the top has people below him who handle that sort of minor detail. Since the job market is so broad, CEO pay ends up being so high to keep them where they are or to attract appropriate talent. A bad CEO gets fired (usually with a disgustingly large severance package), but when you hear about a new CEO coming in either they quit someplace else with less pay or they want a challenge.
So, as in anything else, that market is driven by greed.
Unreal -- I mean it's not like they have a 40 inch vertical leap, or can find the open man in virtually any defense. (j/k)
Seriously, it's a lot of money, but typically it's a lot of job. 40 hours a week, not so much. And your wife better be on board with entertaining visitors. The higher you go, the more you and the company tend to merge.
Also, in well run companies, a lot of the pay is 'at risk. I worked for a pretty decent outfit, and from 50 to 80% of executive pay was based on profit sharing. If their part of the company didn't make money, they took a big hit. Tended to keep them focused.
From what I read Mulally has done a pretty bang up job, so good for him.
If you do rare and awesome things you are worth more than some drone pushing a broom, and in the case of Mulally he saved the job of many drones.
They should pay whatever it takes to keep talent.
drone1 [drohn] Show IPA
noun
1.
the male of the honeybee and other bees, stingless and making no honey.
2.
a remote control mechanism, as a radio-controlled airplane or boat.
3.
a person who lives on the labor of others; parasitic loafer.
4.
a drudge.
Here ya go, I found the correct definition of "drone" for ya. I hardly consider the custodians or any other honest laborer to be a drone. It takes the honest efforts of every employee to make the company work.
Top executives are paid way too much. To me it's a moral issue (so it's not one I'd have the Gov't sticking it's snout in......). When you have that much of a difference between the factory floor and the 3rd floor, you're creating 'classes'.......It's not just the CEO (I know the OP mentioned 3 executives), it's the top suits.
If you divide that by 2000 hours.. in a 50 week, 40 hours per week year, Mr. Mulally is making $14,750 an HOUR...
He is paid more to take a dump on the clock than I can make in a week.
Jim...my guess is that Mr. Mulally works a whole lot more than 40 hours per week. The point remains the same...it does seem like an obscene amount of money. I'm sure the majority was in stock options which they can redeem anytime.
Ken,
I never meant to suggest that he doesn't have a busy schedule, I was just trying to get a handle on what that kind of money meant for us '99%'ers... (lol!)
Ford is not exactly an ordinary corporation in that 40% of the voting shares are held by a foundation or trust owned and controlled by the Ford family. Allan is an employee. His compensation package was negotiated by the BOD, which is ultimately controlled by Ford family members. In reality, Bill Ford, Jr. probably hired him.
IMO, Boeing was stupid to let him walk. It wasnt just about money, but the power and prestige of the CEO position.