When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Like Nicmike, I notice the power difference in the lower RPM band. I have better passing acceleration above 55 if I don't punch it hard enough to drop out of OD. I drove uphill through a tunnel at 40 MPH with the windows down and punched it. My testost-o-meter pegged out and nearby small woodland creatures flat died from heart failure as my wife rolled her eyes - hair flopping wildly about.
I tried getting a recording of the sound by wearing a GoPro on my head, but the audio didn't work the way I planned. Meanwhile, my wife is watching me stomp on a diesel - in a tunnel - with the windows down - and a camera on a headband, as she says "Stand back girls. I saw him first!"
Like Nicmike, I notice the power difference in the lower RPM band. I have better passing acceleration above 55 if I don't punch it hard enough to drop out of OD. I drove uphill through a tunnel at 40 MPH with the windows down and punched it. My testost-o-meter pegged out and nearby small woodland creatures flat died from heart failure as my wife rolled her eyes - hair flopping wildly about.
I tried getting a recording of the sound by wearing a GoPro on my head, but the audio didn't work the way I planned. Meanwhile, my wife is watching me stomp on a diesel - in a tunnel - with the windows down - and a camera on a headband, as she says "Stand back girls. I saw him first!"
LOL! Good stuff, Tugly. The ONLY reason I got the 5" exhaust was I found it and a 4" downpipe for $75 at a junkyard while pulling a rear swaybar off a F350. I didn't want one bad enough to pay retail for it! The junkyard didn't know what they had or what it was worth...
For all the argument in the other thread, I can just say my truck runs MUCH BETTER with the 5" than it did with the stock setup.
finally put on my 4" mbrp from RiffRaff. oh man my truck sounds like a beast now. that stock exhaust sure was quiet! LOL!! my poor neighbours
Lucky! I got everything lined up yesterday and all the tools gathered to put mine on and then I discovered they forgot to give me the hanger clamp. I was just glad I figured it out before I took the stock exhaust off the truck.
Mine did the same as you. But i put the DP tuner in when i did the exhaust.
I posted a trip that i did. I got 18.8 on the flat road, then 14.9 climbing the cajon pass then 17.9 to dumont. my over all mileage turned out to be 16.8 mpg on my 580 mile trip. before the exhaust and tuner i was getting around 12.8 to 14.5
This was done by filling the truck to the neck and refilling divided by mileage at three stops and refilling when i got home
Like Nicmike, I notice the power difference in the lower RPM band. I have better passing acceleration above 55 if I don't punch it hard enough to drop out of OD. I drove uphill through a tunnel at 40 MPH with the windows down and punched it. My testost-o-meter pegged out and nearby small woodland creatures flat died from heart failure as my wife rolled her eyes - hair flopping wildly about.
I tried getting a recording of the sound by wearing a GoPro on my head, but the audio didn't work the way I planned. Meanwhile, my wife is watching me stomp on a diesel - in a tunnel - with the windows down - and a camera on a headband, as she says "Stand back girls. I saw him first!"
You noticed a difference because it spools faster like we have both agreeded. I noticed a difference in that too, no a big difference but enough to notice. Everyone should feel just the slightest bit of power gain going from a stock exhaust to a 4'' mostly because its spooling faster and making a slight bit more boost at lower RPMs. Now I think there was some confusion when when it came to a WOT pass, this is where an exhaust will not change your big boost numbers, it will spool faster and get you to your peak boost number sooner but the end result is you still make the same number. Like I said before and hopefully I clarified it now the only way to make bigger boost numbers is to add fuel.
That sounds like my wife, I jumped a set of tracks on accident awhile back and caught about 2 feet of air, it was a strange road and it was rough so.... I go faster so the truck rides smoother, I hit the tracks went in the air, landed as smooth as could be and my wife was just as excited as I was.
You noticed a difference because it spools faster like we have both agreeded.
100% agreed. It doesn't make the boost higher at cruise, up a hill, or anything like that (except maybe really high RPM under a heavy load). It does allow me to get to max boost without having to wait for the engine RPMs to push it to max. If the back pressure from the pipe gets within a certain range of the back pressure before the turbo drive, the turbo drive has to wait for more pressure from the engine (fuel or RPM) to push harder against the pipe backpressure.
Jumping tracks? I'll just bet if you tried that again, she just might imply she's done with that.
I fixed the attachment - my bad. I don't trust my MAP, I'm reporting boost from the gauge.
The point of those two graphs:
I see no change in EBP before/after 4" during WOT acceleration on any of my graphing.
My boost behaves differently - instead of immediate 20 PSI and climb to 27 PSI with RPM, I now see an immediate 27 PSI boost.
I "feel" more acceleration at lower RPMs (I'm assuming more torque).
Many others report the same experience when going to 4" exhaust.
I understand the dynamics at play here, I am familiar with pressure differentials, flow, and driving force. I see a scenario where the pressure immediately downstream from the drive turbine is elevated during hard acceleration, reducing the pressure differential between the inlet and the outlet of the drive turbine. This reduces flow through the drive side of the turbine and it takes more time to overcome the the downstream back pressure and spool up. Introduce a partial blockage like a cat or a fouled system, and the pressure differential is even lower - possibly limiting the turbo RPMs altogether (low boost in all driving conditions).
Going to the 4" exhaust reduces/eliminates this back pressure downstream from the turbo and the pressure differential is greater, forcing the turbo to spool up rapidly.
OR
Everybody (including myself) is full of carp when we state we notice a difference with the 4".
I fixed the attachment - my bad. I don't trust my MAP, I'm reporting boost from the gauge.
The point of those two graphs:
I see no change in EBP before/after 4" during WOT acceleration on any of my graphing.
My boost behaves differently - instead of immediate 20 PSI and climb to 27 PSI with RPM, I now see an immediate 27 PSI boost.
I "feel" more acceleration at lower RPMs (I'm assuming more torque).
Many others report the same experience when going to 4" exhaust.
I understand the dynamics at play here, I am familiar with pressure differentials, flow, and driving force. I see a scenario where the pressure immediately downstream from the drive turbine is elevated during hard acceleration, reducing the pressure differential between the inlet and the outlet of the drive turbine. This reduces flow through the drive side of the turbine and it takes more time to overcome the the downstream back pressure and spool up. Introduce a partial blockage like a cat or a fouled system, and the pressure differential is even lower - possibly limiting the turbo RPMs altogether (low boost in all driving conditions).
Going to the 4" exhaust reduces/eliminates this back pressure downstream from the turbo and the pressure differential is greater, forcing the turbo to spool up rapidly.
OR
Everybody (including myself) is full of carp when we state we notice a difference with the 4".
Is there a third way of looking at this?
NO one is saying there is not a TQ gain going from a factory exhaust with a cat and muffler to a straight thru 4" system...
HOWEVER what everyone is telling you is there is no REASON to go larger then a 4" system.
If there was 5psi of back pressure in the exhaust system then you could argue your point, however there is not. You have 55psi coming from the turbine housing that drops to 0 once past the outlet of the turbo.