Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

351 cam discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:15 PM
  #1  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
351 cam discussion

so im looking at buying a new cam, and im wanting to do a roller conversion, but i could care less if i do, as long as i can find a good flat tappet.
anyway, all i fojnd on here was the 35-255-5 and the 444232.....neither really interest me cause they are a little small for what i want to do later on
COMP Cams 35-255-5 - COMP Cams Computer-Controlled Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com
Crane Cams 444232 - Crane CompuCam Cam and Lifter Kits - Overview - SummitRacing.com

i think summit has a minor typo because duration @ .050 on the comp is more on the intake but advertized duration on the crane is significantly better...so im assuming the ramprate on the crane is more exponential curve then linear, which would increase velocity (i think) im not happy with the lift of the crane either

what are the other cams that are compatible with efi

my plans are for a 393-408 stroker and mustang/lightning style edelbrock intake and possible boost.

lobe separation is only 111, why isnt this ok for efi
COMP Cams 35-243-4 - COMP Cams Xtreme 4x4 Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:28 PM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Well if you're doing a stroker you'll be into either an aftermarket EFI system with built-in tuning abilities or a Ford MAF setup with a tuner added, and with those systems you can pretty much use any cam you want. But to pick the right cam for your truck you first need to nail down exactly what other parts you are using on and in the motor, what kind of powerband you want it to have, how the truck will be used, what trans, gearing, and tires it will have, and then you can pick a cam that will make the most of the combo.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by UNTAMND
lobe separation is only 111, why isnt this ok for efi
COMP Cams 35-243-4 - COMP Cams Xtreme 4x4 Camshafts - Overview - SummitRacing.com
It is OK for EFI.. just not an all stock factory SD EFI setup.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:31 PM
  #4  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Wrong post.. ignore.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #5  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,776
Likes: 443
The summit numbers aren't a typo. The comp has greater duration @.050, and is why I ultimately chose it. Would it make much difference? No. . .but I felt better choosing the more aggressive ramp rate and greater lift. Adding 1.7 rockers is somethin ill be doing also, so that pushed me toward the extra lift of the comp as well.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #6  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
The truck will have tuning... But not sure which setup yet. Either a maf conversion and e4od (original trans with punisher vb) or an eecv swap and 4r70w.
I realize I can use any cam, but for now I'm sticking with sd and 351. I have several motors I can build and have ready to swap into truck.
If it were a manual trans I'd just put megasquirt on it and do whatever I wanted.

I'm just trying to get some opinions on cams and ideas.
The heads will match the cam. Don't need to worry about that.

Truck is going to be a fun daily driver and a tow rig for my 67 mustang when my diesel is preoccupied. It will never go offroad enough to get muddy. Just down to the lake and winter snow fun.
Not the first efi truck I built, I just figured I'd throw the discussion out there to see others opinions.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:30 PM
  #7  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,776
Likes: 443
Well im overall pleased with my setup. Its 5x better than the 302 and im nowhere near finished, I have a CEL on and I don't have fuel press gauge or wideband hooked up yet so I have no idea what its doing. With that said, it runs out of steam at 3k which im thoroughly confident is due to the cel and tiny injectors. I don't expect it to be a twister by any means, butwith everything thorough ported I expect to play with it enough to get it to pull 4000-4500. Even as it sits now I wont be plagued with downshifts and is a joy to drive. It effortlessly lugs up hills at low rpm and the slightest pedal and can coax some wheel spin when I mash it just right (they're mud terrains). In a few weeks I will have it dialed in as good as it can be, which I think will be substantially better. I don't think the comp is doing much adjustment in relation to all the air I've added since the CEL has been on. Once I address that and get all my gauges hooked up ill be able to play around with it more
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #8  
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,197
Likes: 558
From: Central Wisconsin
Here's my thoughts, studies, and opinions on the subject...
The two cams that were first listed aren't very aggressive. Over factory yes a little more, but I don't think that sticking with an SD friendly cam is really worth the money for a cam that doesn't make much change.
The 3rd cam listed will work in the factory SD system. It's not going to idle worth a **** until it's warm though (after about 5 minutes or so). That's the downfall of SD. It won't compensate for the changes you make to the system. The tune port injection in chevy's are the same way. I helped my buddy build up a camaro with a 350 in it and the cam he got wasn't "supposed" to work with the TPI, but after it warms up it'll idle all day...Or at least it did. He only had the car for about 2 months and his girlfriend wrecked it.
All in all, I'm a fan of carbs. You can run whatever cams, heads, intakes, ect, that you want, and not worry about sensors compensating for whatever changes you make. You can tune it all by yourself, and you don't have to get a computer tuned to make it run every time you change motor parts around.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Feb 17, 2012 | 04:03 AM
  #9  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Thread Starter
|
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
For the cost of making it a carb engine, I can buy all the tuning software and hardware to tune the truck myself.
I'm not taking a step backwards here. If it were originally carbd I wouldn't care but being efi already it's halfway to where I want it already. I will continue getting parts and do one heck of an engine build soon.... Hopefully.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #10  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by GNR22
The two cams that were first listed aren't very aggressive. Over factory yes a little more, but I don't think that sticking with an SD friendly cam is really worth the money for a cam that doesn't make much change.
No these cams aren't that agressive in the big scheme of things but they are significantly bigger and better then stock. When it comes to cams there is a lot more going on than lift and duration and in my experience a rather minor spec difference can make a very noticable difference in power output. Case in point the Crane 444232 is a real giant killer, I have looked at hundreds of cams and it's hard to find any that significantly outperform this one.. and thats with a stock or heavily moified motor. Yes there are some out there but you have to get quite radical to see more than just minor gains on any particular engine combo. Valve lift does seem to be a bit low with this cam but that's easily fixed with 1.7 rockers, that will get you 95% of the airflow capacity of any of the stock heads. And even though the advertised duration numbers would seem to suggest it's more of a high rpm cam it produces outstanding low rpm TQ in a 5.8 and pulls hard all the way to 5000rpm.. assuming the motor has enough head and intake to supply that engine speed.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
quincyj34
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
3
Sep 15, 2015 02:15 PM
Turbo Tim
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
Jan 27, 2009 06:42 PM
pro70golfer14
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Aug 22, 2008 11:42 AM
optikal illushun
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
5
Feb 19, 2003 06:39 PM
bajhafords
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Jun 27, 2000 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE