When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i am a lunati guy , i'd go with the 62001 or 62002
when i have time i'll run the xe256h and 62001 on desktop dyno 5 and compare numbers i'll post the charts some time this weekend for you to compare
yeah i noticed those cams came in real close numbers wise .
Just remember an fyi, dynos per the mfg's have a variance of up to 5% and unless you have the full environmental conditions (temp, humidity, engine exhaust gas temp, air feed and exhaust parts, etc) that can affect the hp/tq as well........but it will give you an idead of what you can expect.
Used to be the Crane 343901 or Crane 343941 for the F.E. in my neighborhood...
As mentioned earlier, Crane has changed hands and I haven't built one for many years now... That aside, I have one in my 390 and my buddy has one in his 410 and loves it, and I don't complain either...
yeah i noticed those cams came in real close numbers wise .
I have heard that desktop dyno is a bit of a pain to use. Is that true? I would appreciate it if you could run the Elgin E-966-P if it isn't to much of a hassle.