When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My apologies, my typo. I have found Wikipedia to be accurate for the most part. A little slanted (depending on who wrote the article) but pretty good otherwise.
Dano78,
I hear you on the 5 bolt. Unfortunately my 289 and C-4 are of the 1964 5 bolt variety which is why the speed shop that built my motor could only use their dyno as a test bed and not actually tune it. Their clutch wouldn't fit inside the only bell housing I could find for the 5 bolt.
I had a 260 in a 63 Mercury Meteor station wagon and it proved to be a great motor. Powerful enough to tow my 14 foot boat and pretty economical with the single barrel carb. Good enough to go camping and boating in AK.
I guess I shouldn't be to hard on the 260. It's a good little engine too, just a bit underpoweded compared to the 289 and 302. I had a '63 Fairlane Sports Coupe many moons ago that had a 260. Good little runner for an original engine, just not a huge powerhouse. Its too bad Ford made the bellhousing change like that, I bet you'd see more hopped up 260s and early 289s if they were all the same.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.