When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A high stall converter would "slip" more, probably would reduce city gas mileage and increase transmission heat. If it still had the lockup feature, highway mileage would not be *that* much different. But high stall converters make the most sense with high-revving engines that do not have a lot of low-end power, and the 300/4.9 six is not that kind of engine. An engine like the old 302/5.0 V8 would benefit far more from a high stall speed converter. (The 302 has a 4 inch bore, 3 inch stroke, whereas the 300 is virtually 4x4 inches, so the "leverage" of the stroke is far greater.)
I put about 90k miles on a 300 inch six in my old '78 Ford pickup, and remember the big torque that the engine put out. I've also owned a couple Ford vehicles (an old E200 van and a '78 LTD II) with 302's. The 302 did not work as well pulling a lot of weight.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.