Notices
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

2003 Rear Differential Fluid Type?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 07:37 AM
  #1  
daveplot's Avatar
daveplot
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury, MD
2003 Rear Differential Fluid Type?

I need to top off the fluid in my rear differential, what's the recommeneded type for a 2003?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 07:45 AM
  #2  
daveplot's Avatar
daveplot
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury, MD
Found in the Ford Service DVD 75w-140... that still the recomendation?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2011 | 02:46 PM
  #3  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,324
Likes: 5,136
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by daveplot
Found in the Ford Service DVD 75w-140... that still the recommendation?
According to your owner's manual, it's 75W-140 synthetic if you have a limited slip rear axle. For the non-limited slip rear axle you would use 75W-90 synthetic.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 08:00 AM
  #4  
broncoholic's Avatar
broncoholic
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 40
From: Melbourne, FL
Originally Posted by daveplot
I need to top off the fluid in my rear differential, what's the recommeneded type for a 2003?
Don't top it off just because it's "low". The fluid level is supposed to be a certain measurement below the fill hole. I don't remember the measurement, but it should be in that dvd service manual you have.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #5  
pdqford's Avatar
pdqford
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 37
From: Central NYS
Originally Posted by daveplot
Found in the Ford Service DVD 75w-140... that still the recomendation?
Right. The 9.75" rear diff calls for SYNTHETIC SAE 75W-140 (with or without Traction-Lok).

The 8.8" diff calls for Synthetic SAE 75W-140 with Traction-Lok or non-synthetic SAE 75W-90 without Traction-Lok.

If you have a front diff Ford specs a non-synthetic SAE 75W-90 for the front diff.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 09:52 AM
  #6  
alwaysfords41's Avatar
alwaysfords41
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
And if you have the LSD you need modifier, if you do a change.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
daveplot's Avatar
daveplot
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Salisbury, MD
Originally Posted by broncoholic
Don't top it off just because it's "low". The fluid level is supposed to be a certain measurement below the fill hole.
Thanks, I looked it up, it's 0.9" below the fill hole.

As to the Friction Modifier, one place in the DVD it says XL-7 (as of 4/30/2003) but elsewhere it says XL-3 (as of 1/28/2002). What's the correct Friction Modifier, i'm assuming XL-7 since it has a newer revision date.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 01:57 PM
  #8  
pdqford's Avatar
pdqford
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 37
From: Central NYS
Originally Posted by daveplot
Thanks, I looked it up, it's 0.9" below the fill hole.
I can't find my manual at the moment, but 0.9" sounds excessive, but it may be correct. Make sure that when you looked it up it wasn't 9mm, which would be between 0.3" and 0.4" below the fill hole.

Originally Posted by daveplot
As to the Friction Modifier, one place in the DVD it says XL-7 (as of 4/30/2003) but elsewhere it says XL-3 (as of 1/28/2002). What's the correct Friction Modifier, i'm assuming XL-7 since it has a newer revision date.
I'm not aware of the difference between the XL-3 and XL-7, but as 1/28/2002 I don't believe Ford had used the IRS in the Expy, so I'd agree with your assumption that XL-7 is correct for the IRS diff.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

5 BEST / 5 WORST Ford Daily Drivers of the 21st Century

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Fords to Drive Before You Die

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / Worst Features Of The 2025+ Ford Expedition

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-5

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-8

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-9

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #9  
cdherman's Avatar
cdherman
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 2
From: Parkville, MO (KC)
.9" is right for 2004 at least.

My local ford counter man -- pretty large and sucesful place -- says that the 75w140 synth is now standard and superceeds the older heavy diff fluids, regardless what your old manual or shop manual says. He has a ford counter manual that shows that.

So you can run the 75w140 up front too...

Ditto all the comments about needing LSD additive. I have a leaky rear. I've decided to mix up a quart of lube with additive so I can top it off (.9" below) whenever I need to.

And BTW, I too find it just plain stupid for Ford to design a diff case, where you have to use a wire bent like an "L" to find the fluid level. Like -- whatever happend to the good ole days where you filled to level of the filler hole and then you knew you had the right ammount in there......
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 04:06 PM
  #10  
pdqford's Avatar
pdqford
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,740
Likes: 37
From: Central NYS
Originally Posted by cdherman
.9" is right for 2004 at least.
Thanks for the confirmation.

Originally Posted by cdherman
And BTW, I too find it just plain stupid for Ford to design a diff case, where you have to use a wire bent like an "L" to find the fluid level.
Exactly! And how about the way Ford threatens your warranty if you use the wrong spec fluid, and then all of a sudden its okay (like the Mercon/Mercon V confusion)? Makes one wonder how important their 'spec" is.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2011 | 11:48 PM
  #11  
ScottyDsntKnow's Avatar
ScottyDsntKnow
Elder User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
I just do it like I've always done, use a pump to fill through the fill hole until fluid starts to spill out, put the plug back in, done. I've never and have never heard of anyone having a problem doing it this way.

I also run full syn in front and back, 75w-90 front, 75w-140 rear with a tube of friction modifier mixed up in the first quart to go in each of them.

I drained/filled each diff when I first got the vehicle, part of routine maintenance for any used rwd/4wd vehicle I buy. That and the TC/trans fluid and transfer case as well...

edit: and you don't want to "top off" diff fluid. If its low and was filled properly its leaking and needs a new gasket or cover or both. If it isn't leaking it wasn't filled properly. Either way its best to just drain all the old funky fluid out and give your vehicle new fresh stuff that'll last you a while.
 
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 12:05 PM
  #12  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,324
Likes: 5,136
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by cdherman
whatever happened to the good ole days where you filled to level of the filler hole and then you knew you had the right amount in there......
The reason for the change was cosmetic. When the fluid levels were up at the filler hole, fluid always seemed to ooze out and look unsightly. By lowering the fluid level it kept the fluid away from the filler threads.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
V8SHO
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Jan 12, 2017 01:57 PM
jdq1986
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
6
Oct 28, 2016 04:46 PM
Brewcity
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
5
Oct 14, 2016 02:14 PM
Marioj87
2004 - 2008 F150
7
Jan 28, 2016 05:19 PM
klandry
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
22
Jun 28, 2004 09:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.

story-0
5 BEST / 5 WORST Ford Daily Drivers of the 21st Century

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford daily drivers of the 21st century.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-23 08:55:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Fords to Drive Before You Die

Slideshow: 10 Fords to drive before you die.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-22 14:29:44


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / Worst Features Of The 2025+ Ford Expedition

The latest Expedition is quite popular, but it certainly isn't perfect.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-22 14:23:19


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-5
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-7
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE