Notices
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1991-1994, 1995-2001, 2002-2005, 2006-2010 Ford Explorer

4.0 OHV engine experts please help - quick question about connecting rod torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #1  
jimkari's Avatar
jimkari
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
4.0 OHV engine experts please help - quick question about connecting rod torque

I have a 2000 Explorer with the 4.0 OHV. My Ford factory service manual lists two different torques for the connecting rod nuts. In one spot it says 18-24 lb/ft. In another spot in the same manual it says to torque in two steps 15 lb-ft then torque an additional 90 degrees. Does anyone know what is right? Is one based on whether the bolts are new? If its the two step process do I need to replace the bolts like the head bolts? I don't want to get this wrong and have a rod cap break or come loose.

Thanks,

Jim
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 12:19 AM
  #2  
Pkupman82's Avatar
Pkupman82
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 5
From: Muskegon, MI (home)
The the last two OHV 4.0s I was into I did not replace the rod bolts. I torqued em down to 25 ft lbs and called it good, haven't had a problem yet... that engine has over 12k on the rebuild with no problems yet. That's in the ol lady's 90 Ranger, she drives at least 40 miles a day... not to mention she does get a bit rowdy with it from time to time.
John
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 06:15 AM
  #3  
jimkari's Avatar
jimkari
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Thanks for the quick reply. I checked my Haynes manual and it too offers the same two different torque setting. However in this manual it says the 18-24 lb/ft torque is for the earlier 4.0 OHV (I think 90-96) and the later engines have this two step torque process.

I just don't know what is the correct torque for a 2000 4.0 OHV. Has anyone done a later model OHV?

Jim
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2011 | 12:52 AM
  #4  
Pkupman82's Avatar
Pkupman82
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 5
From: Muskegon, MI (home)
You might try consulting with your local Ford garage, otherwise I think you can download the info you need from Mitchell auto repair manuals (they seem to be the most accurate to the factory specs). If I had to guess I would say you have to go by the 2nd torque sequence you mentioned. As for replacing the rod bolts, when in doubt do it anyway... concider the alternative.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #5  
jimkari's Avatar
jimkari
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Great thought. I checked with my local ford dealer and the chief engine mechanic did recommend going with the two step (torque to yield) process and he recommended changing the bolts.

Thanks again,

Jim
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2016 | 11:19 PM
  #6  
sweckerbill420's Avatar
sweckerbill420
New User
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
The torque specs I got were 22 ft/lbs first pattern and then 52 ft/lbs second time around...
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 06:52 AM
  #7  
shorod's Avatar
shorod
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,817
Likes: 83
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
I just pulled up the "Connecting Rod" section in the Ford factory service manual for the 2000 pushrod engine. The factory torque is listed as the following:

Install the nuts and tighten in two steps.
  1. Tighten to 20 Nm (15 lb-ft).
  1. Tighten an additional 90 degrees.
Additionally, the manual makes no mention in the disassembly or reassembly section about discarding the nuts, so it sounds like they can be reused. It does mention the caps and rods are a matched set and must be installed in the correct position.

When I pulled up the same section in the Ford factory service manual for the 1996 4.0L engine, the torque spec is the single "Tighten the nuts to 25-32 Nm (18-24 lb-ft)" statement so I suspect the comment above about the difference being dependent upon model year is accurate.

-Rod
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2019 | 12:54 PM
  #8  
ranger284's Avatar
ranger284
New User
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
rod torque

I know this is an old thread, but if anyone is still around what is the "book" saying for the '98 4.0 OHV (pushrod) engine? I was advised (by machine shop) to replace the bolts and do the two torque method. The problem is Ford does not have these bolts available and so far haven't found anywhere. Can the old bolts be used in the two torque method, or what is advised? Thanks.

<<I just pulled up the "Connecting Rod" section in the Ford factory service manual for the 2000 pushrod engine. The factory torque is listed as the following:

Install the nuts and tighten in two steps.
  1. Tighten to 20 Nm (15 lb-ft).
  1. Tighten an additional 90 degrees.
Additionally, the manual makes no mention in the disassembly or reassembly section about discarding the nuts, so it sounds like they can be reused. It does mention the c.aps and rods are a matched set and must be installed in the correct position.

When I pulled up the same section in the Ford factory service manual for the 1996 4.0L engine, the torque spec is the single "Tighten the nuts to 25-32 Nm (18-24 lb-ft)" statement so I suspect the comment above about the difference being dependent upon model year is accurate.>>
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 21, 2019 | 01:56 PM
  #9  
Poker4me007's Avatar
Poker4me007
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 87
Likes: 3
This site might be some help.
https://therangerstation.com/tech_li...4_0_Page.shtml


Pete.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eman92082
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
12
Sep 14, 2017 12:02 PM
stewmanc
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
2
Mar 16, 2017 07:22 AM
Skyhawk Greg
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
Feb 16, 2017 10:04 AM
FORDF250HDXLT
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Jan 1, 2017 03:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE