312 y-block on criagslist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-13-2011, 12:07 AM
Rusty_Old_F250's Avatar
Rusty_Old_F250
Rusty_Old_F250 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
312 y-block on criagslist

1962 ford 312 engine

Looks like a deal to me, thought I might pass this along to you y-block folks. If it was an FE I be out buying it myself! But, I think it'd be a little tough to stuff a Y-block into my rig.

Sam

By the way- I'm not connected to the seller in any way, I just thought I mention that. I just hate to see good old iron melted down and sent to china.
 
  #2  
Old 05-13-2011, 12:32 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115
HT32BSX115 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 0
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Rusty_Old_F250
1962 ford 312 engine

Looks like a deal to me, thought I might pass this along to you y-block folks. If it was an FE I be out buying it myself! But, I think it'd be a little tough to stuff a Y-block into my rig.

Sam

By the way- I'm not connected to the seller in any way, I just thought I mention that. I just hate to see good old iron melted down and sent to china.
That would probably be a good deal if it really IS a 312......

A LOT of people that do not know, call all Y-blocks "312".

Who ever decides to buy it should pull the pan to look at the main caps and the crank to determine for sure.

http://ford-y-block.com/Block%20identification.htm


I'm not absolutely sure, but I don't think the 312 was available in a truck originally......

I'd rather have a 292HD for a truck....


regards,



Rick
 
  #3  
Old 05-13-2011, 12:44 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
How many 1962 FoMoCo vehicles came with a 312? None.

312: 1956/57 Ford Passenger Cars & Thunderbirds / 1956/60 Mercury Passenger Cars / 312's were not offered in trucks.

B&S: 312 = 3.80" x 3.44" // 292 = 3.75" x 3.30" // 272 = 3.62" x 3.30" // 256 = 3.62" x 3.10" (1954/55 Merc's only) // 239 = 3.50" x 3.10"

Note: 1955 Y with a 4V: The carb is the awful Holley "teapot" the auto choke is mounted on the intake manifold! / 1956 Y with a 4V = Teapot / 1957 312 w/dual 4V's = Teapots.

With a teapot, the intake manifold has a different bolt pattern, so...no other 4V carb will fit.
 
  #4  
Old 05-13-2011, 01:28 PM
Y-Blockhead's Avatar
Y-Blockhead
Y-Blockhead is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What The Number Guy says... still might not be a bad deal if the 292 runs good. Just my 1¢.
 
  #5  
Old 05-13-2011, 09:04 PM
46yblock's Avatar
46yblock
46yblock is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
How many 1962 FoMoCo vehicles came with a 312? None.

312: 1956/57 Ford Passenger Cars & Thunderbirds / 1956/60 Mercury Passenger Cars / 312's were not offered in trucks.

B&S: 312 = 3.80" x 3.44" // 292 = 3.75" x 3.30" // 272 = 3.62" x 3.30" // 256 = 3.62" x 3.10" (1954/55 Merc's only) // 239 = 3.50" x 3.10"

Note: 1955 Y with a 4V: The carb is the awful Holley "teapot" the auto choke is mounted on the intake manifold! / 1956 Y with a 4V = Teapot / 1957 312 w/dual 4V's = Teapots.

With a teapot, the intake manifold has a different bolt pattern, so...no other 4V carb will fit.
ND, I have seen some of your other references to the "Terrible Teapot". I have never run one, have you? I am very aware of their reputation, but feel like there must be somthing more than "terrible". How about an objective critique of the antique? Really, it would be interesting. No sarcasm here.

I do know that without the correct synthetic ball as opposed to metalic ball check valve, the vacuum signal to dist. will be wrong. Most if not all rebuild kits for 4000s come with a steel ball.

Some guys are running dual 4000s.

Just guessing on the CFM based upon the throttle bore size, but 350 maybe.

4000s can be run with the later centrifugal advance distributors, after very minor carb alteration.

I recently rehabed a '54 Merc intake and model 2180 4V. What is the problem with the choke mounted on the side of the intake? It seemed slick, again, I never have run the setup. There was no tube running from one side of the crossover to the other like in 56 57 intakes, often found burned out and a bitch to replace.

I did wonder on the 2180 about a hot air connection running directly from the manifold exhaust crossover up to the inside of the air intake. Seemed like a leaking float bowl gasket or overflowed float bowl could have access to exhaust gas. With a little amount of thought that could be remedied.
 
  #6  
Old 05-14-2011, 03:23 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by 46yblock
ND, I have seen some of your other references to the "Terrible Teapot". I have never run one, have you? I am very aware of their reputation, but feel like there must be somthing more than "terrible". How about an objective critique of the antique? Really, it would be interesting. No sarcasm here.

I recently rehabed a '54 Merc intake and model 2180 4V. What is the problem with the choke mounted on the side of the intake? It seemed slick, again, I never have run the setup. There was no tube running from one side of the crossover to the other like in 56 57 intakes, often found burned out and a bitch to replace.
=.
B6Q-9510-A = 4V Holley Carburetor: 1956 Ford, Thunderbird & Mercury 292/312.

I owned a 1956 T-Bird with this carb. Ford tune up guys didn't want to touch this and the others, referred to them as 'toilet bowl' carbs. FTE member Garbz2 sez peeps also called it a teapot.

So, either teapot or toilet bowl is apropos.

Peeps that owned 1955/56 vehicles with the teapot carbs switched to the 1957/60 4V manifold that used the Holley double pumper...when they could find one.

Even today, this 4V manifold is desireable (and very hard to find). One a the members (a hustler of parts) of the 1961/66 forum found one in a '64 F100 that had a swapped 1960 Merc 312 4V engine, asked if it was worth anything.

I said...go back and get it, you won't have it long.

I merely pointed out that the choke mounted on the intake manifold was odd, since most peeps are unaware of this unusual location.
 
  #7  
Old 05-14-2011, 09:46 AM
46yblock's Avatar
46yblock
46yblock is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A friend who has been a professional mechanic since 1962(!) thinks the old T pots were cool carbs. Among his many talents is carb rebuilding, which he did 3 or 4 times a week for years. He had a chasis dyno in S. CA and often it would show up problems in the carburetion area.


On the 4000 with the float bowl mounted above the boosters/venturi's, improperly installed and maintained gaskets could be a special problem. Dont know how a backfire would affect it compared to later models.

I figure the intake mounted choke was done away with for cost cutting in casting and machining. One very interesting thing about the '54 Merc intake I mentioned, was that the casting was SMOOTH, outside and inside. Many of the '57 4V intakes have very rough castings, making them look ugly.
 
  #8  
Old 05-18-2011, 06:34 PM
312's Avatar
312
312 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
these were great carbs in their day.good on gas.i would never take a good running one off.i also didnt mind the early dist, that came with them.i think the trouble today is their just worn out.
 
  #9  
Old 06-13-2011, 11:19 AM
Nojive55's Avatar
Nojive55
Nojive55 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: KC Kansas metro
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two more Ys

Enjoyed the info on the teapots, I heard them called "Haystackers", might be a regional thing.

Found these with CLAZ.com, searches all classified, including Craigslist.
The $50 for a running motor is practically free, wish I was closer. I know guys that have more than $650 in their heads for unleaded conversion so that is not a bad deal either, (some assembly required).

Auto Parts: Ford 292 Y-Block Motor - Kentucky, Louisville

Locate Any Auto: 1964 Ford Truck 292 V8 Y Block - Raleigh

Beings, I have an 56 F-350, I am more interested in reliabilty than raw power, with my gearing it does not take much power, just don't get in a hurry.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bob's 1953
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
04-01-2017 12:49 PM
Kurt G.
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
09-28-2016 11:32 AM
Randz58
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
08-04-2011 08:24 AM
skips 56
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
07-04-2009 06:40 AM
yield2s
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
03-12-2008 12:44 PM



Quick Reply: 312 y-block on criagslist



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.