4.9L vs. 5.0L
What six was in that F-600 do you know? Was it the 240 or the 300?
The owner of the Roadrunner said that. He said the big blocks were good at going in a straight line but you could handle the 383's around the corners.
I think these types of threads are funny and full of irony. I like all Ford engines because I'm a Ford fan. Some are better than others and I think all will agree. When it comes to the 300 over 302 you hear the points like no timing chain, seven main bearings, etc, etc. And I agree I love a 300-6. I like one so much that I installed one in a 1952 GMC 6X6. Cannot destroy it and I've tried. But when you hear that the 300 is better just because it IS an inline six and then you read the other threads comparing the 5.9 Cummins to the IH 6.0, the arguments shift the other way. 'The 6.0 is better because it revs higher, it is a v-8, it has more moving parts, blah, blah, blah'. I just think that is funny to watch the diehards argue one side and than argue the other. I like the IH 6.0, it makes modest power and is semi-reliable. I equate it to the 351m of the diesel world.
Hey, I would LOVE to see pictures of that 6x6!!! PLEASE!
Thank you all for putting me in my place... I never realized that my attempts to keep the thread topic ON topic were a threat to the forum. I am forever grateful to those who seem to think I am such a detriment.
No, I think it was more this comment, which I found a little unnecessary myself.
Bradyracing, I know the types of discussions you're meaning. I don't, however, think this is one of them.
It's a pretty honest discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both engines.
The 302 is a great engine, no doubt about it. However, I just don't think it was designed for a truck in mind. Ford put it in trucks because they needed engine options, and a mid-level V8. It was put in trucks for marketing and sales. Sure, there were some features specific to the truck version of the 302, and with a driver that knows how to utilize it I'm sure one can do plenty of things the 300 and 351 can, but it just wasn't made with that kind of work in mind. There's a reason it wasn't offered in F-250s and F-350s whereas the 300 was.
On that note, I wouldn't want a car with a 300 in it, I'd want a 302. With a car, I don't need 260 ft/lbs the second I touch the gas pedal, I need one that can breath and move me effortlessly down the interstate.
It's a pretty honest discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both engines.
The 302 is a great engine, no doubt about it. However, I just don't think it was designed for a truck in mind. Ford put it in trucks because they needed engine options, and a mid-level V8. It was put in trucks for marketing and sales. Sure, there were some features specific to the truck version of the 302, and with a driver that knows how to utilize it I'm sure one can do plenty of things the 300 and 351 can, but it just wasn't made with that kind of work in mind. There's a reason it wasn't offered in F-250s and F-350s whereas the 300 was.
On that note, I wouldn't want a car with a 300 in it, I'd want a 302. With a car, I don't need 260 ft/lbs the second I touch the gas pedal, I need one that can breath and move me effortlessly down the interstate.
This certainly should not have been the only unnecessary comment you found.....I merely stated Bxtchie1 did not ask anyone to compare the 7.3 diesel to anything....only stated that was the primary vehicle......sorry I came off harsh ...It is my nature to come through the front door.....straight up.
i almost wanted to cry when i went through a deep puddle on my way home. my power got reduced to half and would cut in and out when flooring it. (302)
with that aside, a contracted cold 302 block with warmed internals will out run most any truck around. everything works right and it takes off like a million trillion torque and hp.
when i say warm internals meaning the temperature outside is rather cold and the engine was once running not long to being started again thus the block is technically cold.
i am full of so much BS
the needle on the BS meter actually trips the Richter scale for earthquakes
with that aside, a contracted cold 302 block with warmed internals will out run most any truck around. everything works right and it takes off like a million trillion torque and hp.

when i say warm internals meaning the temperature outside is rather cold and the engine was once running not long to being started again thus the block is technically cold.
i am full of so much BS
the needle on the BS meter actually trips the Richter scale for earthquakes
I've had 4.9, 5.0, and 5.8's and my 4.9 was a good lugger but also had the granny gear, both 5.0's performed just as well and 1 made 326,000k and still going when sold (never touched other than maint.) My other 5.0 had 379,000k when sold and the same as the other. My 5.8 has 250,000k and still going strong. all are good engines!
no. who are you kidding? i am 20 with a fantastic job at carquest. i don't have time for that
with all respect i am a bit whobbly
the 302 was the stigs preference in 1987 when efi was eminent.
with all respect i am a bit whobbly

the 302 was the stigs preference in 1987 when efi was eminent.
aside from that, carquest is a national company and you can find a store in almost all of the states. its kind of like working for UPS, can be had anywhere (however you are limited to the USA with carquest....)
i am a customer service teammate but i spend 90% of my time doing deliveries. I am very happy with this job. the company in a whole is very generous to me. i look forward to going to work every day.
if you are serious about a job position, go to your local carquest and apply.
Oh I know what carquest is! I remember the commericials now.
I like the American version much better than the UK sister. They actually do American vehicles.
Carkson hates American cars. Ever see his take on the Ford lightning? haha.
I like the American version much better than the UK sister. They actually do American vehicles.
Carkson hates American cars. Ever see his take on the Ford lightning? haha.
now what if we throw in the 5.8 compared to the 5.0 and 4.9, then what would you choose. I got a 5.8 in my pickup, it does ok and my brother had the 302 in his bronco, it seemed to move. My little cousin has a 4.9 in his pickup but its a yard vehicle, he likes it. so whats your opinion as im looking at a bronco with a 5.8 in it.
.
sorry if this may mess up this thread but would make a good thread if we throw in the 7.5

.sorry if this may mess up this thread but would make a good thread if we throw in the 7.5
fourteen(14), yes 14 years later, I have not had a problem with hi-rev to red line ~4500rpm with my 5.8, so for me it would be never, not almost.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WaterdogF150
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Feb 14, 2024 06:48 PM
Osiyo59
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Jan 30, 2015 02:23 PM
f1501987
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
24
Oct 5, 2011 07:23 AM














