When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would suggest ya'll read the first post...
"This time we've got Phil Fabien, V6 Engine Development Specialist joining us next Wednesday to offer commentary, and answer YOUR questions"
That was posted 1/12/11. Next Wednesday would have been 1/19/11. Most of the questions were answered then and in the couple of days that followed.
Phil hasn't logged on since 1/23/11, according to his profile.
Don't get all pissy because you didn't get your questions in on time. Be happy that he took the time to answer *any* questions.
While waiting for Phil, or anyone else to answer my questions, a guy in town has listed a very nice used BMW 528 wagon with the slide out cargo tray with only about 17,000 miles on it. It isn't the perfect solution, but it would be a cool way to haul stuff and get the family around efficiently at one third the cost of the F150. The F150 was a bit big for our needs and we can not find any useful information about real world efficiency.
By promising to participate, then not participating, Ford's rep has managed to dissuade buyers. In the absence of a requested information, interested buyers are wondering around like a herd of cats.
We should all be very gracious for his time. Don't forget, he has a job and most likely a family as well.
Many questions on here have been irrelevant or not related to the ecoboost. I know, I asked a question about the 5.0L and got no answer. But I didn't complain, I redirected with another more relevant question. Still no answer, no biggy, he's busy.
Go get your beamer if that's what you want. But please sir, don't insult this fine engineer on our behalf.
The Senior Powertrain Engineer did an online chat and his descriptions of the engines was enlightening. Surmising the common choices in the powertrain line up something like this:
3.7 the option for the most cost sensitive buyers that performs well
5.0 the perfect match for the F150
3.5 EB .. the "and" solution. Does everything AND gets better fuel economy
we can not find any useful information about real world efficiency aside from the pickuptrucks.com v6 work truck shoot out.
That's going to be hard to find considering the fact that all four engines are new to the F-150 for 2011. Not sure of the sales numbers thus far since the release, but I've seen very little in the way of efficiency reports.
Originally Posted by FI50
Suggest to the mods they lock the thread if no loner serves its intended purpose.
He will be back. We experience this with many of the reps that have volunteered their time. They come in and field questions as time allows and we appreciate their time and participation. They have other commitments aside from FTE and have to fulfill those as well.
Do you recommend using seasonal thinner oil (vs. factory 5W30) in extreme cold climates where flow at cold start is an issue?
Such as 0W30 or 0W20. Wouldn't the advantages of flow at start-up outweigh any (unlikely give the temp) excess potential heat issues.?
Sorry for the slow response, I tried to answer your question several times last Sunday and had WIFI issues at home. I got busy at work, so I will try again. We at Ford test both the powertrain and vehicle at both hot and cold temperature extremes with the factory oil viscosity. So I would recommend that you stick with the factory/service viscosity.
Phil,
How realistic is the simulated mileage? My first thought is that there is no way to really simulate age and the things that come with it. Gasket materials lose their plyability over time, etc. Do you actually do historical teardowns of actual engines that we in use? Obviously were are years away from this on ecoboost, but do you guys tear down modular engines with 100k plus miles to learn lessons, etc?
The dynamometer mileage is very realistic with respect to the mechanical and thermal fatigue that an engine is subjected to through it's life. We accelerate the testing by running the engine for long periods of times at high engine speeds, torque levels in addition to large swings in temperatures. This does put tremendous stress on the sealing components. In addition to engine testing, components like gaskets also have to pass rigorous bench tests. Yes we do teardown older engine architectures to help us develop our new engines and improve designs if required.
Did Ford source the injectors from Panasonic, or another Japanese supplier, to ensure reliability in these component parts?
Thank you for your interest in the Ecoboost F150. I do not get involved in sourcing decisions, however I am responsible for testing the engine after all of the parts are designed and sourced (both internally manufactured and purchased components). What I can say is that regardless of the source, all engine components have to pass our very rigorous durability tests as well as individual component bench tests. We do not put parts on our engines or vehicles that do not meet our high quality standards.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
You're probably right. Though I'm not dissuaded, I AM disappointed in someone who promises but does not deliver. I've heard enough good info to make me want a new F150, but more never hurts, especially when someone indicates said info IS forthcoming. Then NOT getting it is a bit of a letdown. Phil, if you read this, we need your input here!
I apologize for my slow responses. Like all of you, I have a job and family to tend to before I can look at the great questions coming in on this blog. Unfortunately I had issues with my WIFI at home last weekend and was very busy last week with work and personal commitments. In addition to that, I do not always have the information available to answer your questions while I am home and I have to wait until I get to work.
Hey Phil- Looks like my comment was a bit premature, and me the one to apologize! Some of us thought the "series" was done. But NOOOOO, and thankfully so! I guess a little more patience on our part is in order here! So we'll pile up the questions, and you get to them when you are good and ready. Keep up the good work!
First, I would like to thank Phil for taking time to come in here and answer questions. For us gear heads its invaluable and you are the best salesman Ford has whether you know it or not.
My question is about the intelligent oil life monitor. Were you part of that development for the EB 3.5 and did the EB engine that was tore down use this system to determine oil changes? Or, was it just a predetermined amount of hours run or simulated miles? Thank you for your time.
Hope that I'm not too late to pose a question that has been holding up my order / purchase decision.
1. Which engine gets the absolute best mileage for flat land commuting in a Super Cab 4X2 (which is 95% of my driving) ?
2. Many in the press were expecting a 24MPG rating for the 3.5 EB and had obtained even better results in their limited testing. Can you add any color as to why the 3.5 was rated slightly below the efficiency of the 3.7 ? How realistic are the EPA figures for those who drive our trucks VERY smoothly? Not that I would admit to driving like a "hypermiler" but I can get 21 to 21.5 out of a 2004 5.4 SCab Lariat.
3. Finally, do the larger wheel / tire combinations significantly decrease efficiency due to increased rotating weight? If buying a truck for commuting, would YOU pick the 17 inch, 18 inch, or 20's?
Thank you so much! We are a 4 Ford house and have gotten excellent products and service from your Company. Traveled to NAIAS from Atlanta just to see the engine and learn more about this engine.
Lastly, could you sneak a Sport Trac Adrenalin powered by the 3.5 VTGTDI out the back door? I'll show up with a briefcase full of cash and not tell anyone.
Re posting original question. Thank you if you can answer. Will either get an 3.7 XLT Custom or FX2 with 3.5 GTDI based on the response. Again, thank you for your insights.
When you guys beat the competition at Davis Dam with the EB demo, would your lead while towing have been greater, or smaller had you ran it with the now available 4.10 rear end of the FX4?
Sorry for the slow repsonse, your question is one that I kept loing while replying at home.
In an effort to be fair to the competition, we selected trucks that were as close as possible with repsect to content and final drive ratios. If we had used a 4.10 rear end, the difference in both the 0-60 and 3.5 mile run would have been even larger.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.