35" mud terrains

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 10, 2011 | 05:02 PM

Ben82

Thread Starter

New User

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

35" mud terrains

I just got 4 35" mud terrains with about half tread for $50

but my question is will they fit on the back of my 91 f150 2wd without a lift or will i need some blocks I'm just putting the tires on the back since its only 2wd

Jan 10, 2011 | 05:15 PM

92nite351

Elder User

Joined: Dec 2010

Posts: 501

Likes: 0

From: Morrill, Me

they will rub like thighs on a fat chick...lol u would need to raise the rear 4 sure

Jan 10, 2011 | 05:27 PM

zxwut?

Fleet Mechanic

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 1,964

Likes: 2

From: Fort Worth

It's going to have quite the rake to it...

Jan 10, 2011 | 05:40 PM

fishforlife2007

Elder User

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 704

Likes: 2

From: louisville, ky

Quote:

Originally Posted by zxwut?

It's going to have quite the rake to it...

ya no kidding

Jan 10, 2011 | 06:15 PM

Ben82

Thread Starter

New User

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

I figured I'd probly need some lift I also thought about a 3'' body lift would that do the trick?
and is it seriously going to be bad i mean like so it feels like im going to fall forward while i'm driving it lol

Jan 10, 2011 | 06:17 PM

fishforlife2007

Elder User

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 704

Likes: 2

From: louisville, ky

if you are going body lift, you may need to do some trimming, or spacing on the front bumper. and yes....the lean would be horrible....id get a kick outa seein it on the road.

Jan 10, 2011 | 06:17 PM

skyfox10

Posting Guru

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 2,314

Likes: 0

From: southwest michigan

Pictured: Truck with 2" leveling in front on 35's. I think with a 2wd you'd be pushing it. I'd say if you went 2" all around you could fit 35's under the rear.

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Joe Kucinski

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Brett Foote

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Verdad Gallardo

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Joe Kucinski

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Brett Foote

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

Pouria Savadkouei

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Brett Foote

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Joe Kucinski

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Michael S. Palmer

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Verdad Gallardo

Jan 10, 2011 | 07:11 PM

CJM8515

Posting Guru

Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 1,008

Likes: 2

From: Freehold

I think 33's would work much better, 35s gonna rub like you wont believe.

Jan 11, 2011 | 02:50 AM

#10

TexasGuy001

Hotshot

Joined: Sep 2001

Posts: 11,958

Likes: 228

That will effectively regear the truck in the opposite direction from what anyone would want. It will make the truck sluggish since it will be lugging all the time. Performance and fuel economy will drop. If you have the 5.0 I really recommend against this. I would just get some 31 10.50s.

Jan 11, 2011 | 11:03 AM

#11

Ben82

Thread Starter

New User

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

I have the 351 and i mainly just want the mud tires so I can get more traction in the mud me and my friends like to go a lot and i want to throw more stuff around and hopefully not get stuck as often if i sold these and bought a set of 33's would that be better?

Jan 11, 2011 | 11:07 AM

#12

CJM8515

Posting Guru

Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 1,008

Likes: 2

From: Freehold

Might fit better, the back will fit no issue-its the front. 2wd trucks and large tires dont mix very well since they are so low.

What would help you out greatly is to put a locker or at least a limited slip in your rear axle.