92+ front frame section strength
I recently bought this 95 F150 frame to transplant my 65 cab onto. The original plan was to stuff my '65 352 FE in there and run it until it dies, then install a built 6.9.
At that point, I would add more bracing to the frame and go with different running gear to handle the power. D50 TTB/Ford 10.25 combo. I wouldn't bother going with a 60 since the F150 frame seems a bit thin to handle both a 6.9's weight AND a snow plow. Although I'd really like to do that...Maybe some extra frame plating will be enough.
What's cool? It's a short wheelbase chassis...and I only paid $100 for it...talk about sweeeet looks. Not so good as usable, since the wheelbase is too short for comfortable heavy towing, and besides the F150 frame thickness will come into play. I would say max out at 8k pound trailer load once the D50/10.25 upgrade took place. The stock rating is 6k, so another 2k should still be OK as long as the larger F250 brakes are used. The short wheelbase is what scares me.
Back to the frame issue. The rig will spend most of its time off-road on the abandoned logging roads gathering firewood. It can get nasty out there, so I'm planning a 2" receiver in the front wih a custom thick steel plate bumper....and a winch. Will a winch make this frame go like an acordion and expand? If so, I'd cut the frame just beyond the acordion area and go with some serious box tubing.
Any thoughts?
Trending Topics
Were the body and bed mounts changed in 92 to 96 from the 91s? I was planning on doing a body swap this spring on my 91 F250 7.3 4x4 ext. cab (she's rusty but runs great, and drives good). Now I'm even wondering if I can do this with a 92 or so body without messing with body mounts and everything?
-Pat
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I am not for sure they did, but that is what i got out of BlueOvalBud's post
i may be wrong, someone please correct me if i am .
i wouldn't put a plow on a 1/2 the frame seems to thin and components would wear out to fast i think... my brothers old 88 1/2 ton frame seemed paper thin compared to mine..... it could be done i imagine people do some crazy stuff....
YouTube - Car Pulling Trailer Smoking
My vote is you'll be just fine with a winch. The crumple zone will fold under an impact and should be just fine under the load placed on by a winch.
As for a plow, I wouldn't want a V-blade, just a standard straight blade would work fine for me. I'm looking at residential driveways, where a short wheelbase rig earns its weight in gold!
Trust me, all my background before trucks is in our Jeep CJ7 and CJ8 Scrambler. That's what I grew up learning how to turn wenches on. I'm 20 now, now too many kids can go through middle school and help their Dad buld a Jeep Scrambler. Trust me, we're no expert mechanics. Matter of fact, we took the drivetrain from a CJ7 with a rusted frame and transplanted it into a used Scrambler frame with a new fiberglass tub. Yep, used the farm tractor from the neighbor to move the engine, and put it all together with a simple Benchtop 3/8" drive ratchet set. A CJ7 with a 6' snow plow can perform magic compared to a full-size truck. Don't expect to move a mountain, not enough weight and traction.
The 1/2 ton vs 3/4 ton and 1 ton debate. There are just as many 80-96 F150 plow trucks around town as new trucks. The older rigs just won't die. The F150 vs F250 debate can go on forever, but the F150 really does get trashed on pretty hard, it can certainly do more than people think. Ask 94F250HDXLT (or whatever his name is, I always get the trim and HD mixed up in order) He had a 90's F150 4x4 loaded to the gills with wood chips on a daily basis with F350 springs until he bought his F250. His testimony is what basically made me open my eyes, since I also used to think the same way..."oh, F150's are useless, get an F350!" Sure, an F350 will last longer, but the F150 shouldn't be under rated. Remember, stuff you read on the internet is typically biased in one way or another based on that person's experience. Does a Dana 44 HD TTB belong under a diesel F250? Well....not if your IDI has been "fine tuned" with a turbo and you like to punch the loud pedal in low range. But if you're only using it for traction in the snow...then yeah, why not? I've seen TTB's in F150's and F250's BEATEN and they're fine at the end of the day.
Kenpobuck, I'm VERY glad you read this. I've been wondering about you and your conversion. I did not realize the Bronco frame is heavier than an F150, thanks for sharing. As I recall, you picked up a plow for your rig last winter/spring right? Hooked up yet?
Also, as I've been thinking more about a 6.9 turbo in an F150...I recently read in one the threads that the '93 7.3 turbo weighs 900 pounds fully dressed. It was posted by typefour and he read it straight from the Ford manual. So weight really isn't a HUGE issue since LOTS of people have installed 460's into F150 since...like forever. 460 weighs a lot, maybe a bit less than a 6.9. But a built 460 could do just as much damage as a turbo 6.9. The difference that a has engine will bog down when under load and have some "give" so to speak. Where the diesel will NOT give, and that's when you buy new parts. I also recall starmilt put a 6.9 in his 70's F100 4x4. He had no issues with weight on the front end, he had no issues with the 9" rear, but blew the spiders in the front Dana 44 a couple times when he stood on the skinny pedal.
Back to the winch, if the acordion won't come out then I'll leave it as is.






