Fan Shroud
#4
#6
#7
The shroud increases cooling at low speeds. An electric fan is better than a fixed fan but the hydraulic fan clutch works pretty well. The biggest attraction of the electric fan is to help out at low speeds and it helps A/C performance. A fan big enough will put a pretty good load on the electrical system. In the past I have used single, duals, and an electric aux to supplement for towing. If an electric fan is going to be your only source of cooling I would go with duals. BTW all my fans came from the JY .
regards
rikard
regards
rikard
Trending Topics
#8
Actually, a lot of car magazines have dyno tested new and old vehicles with mechanical fans then compared results with electric fans, and found that the older, hydraulic clutch mechanical fan leaves more horsepower to apply to rear wheels than an electric fan.
Part of the reason is converting from mechanical energy to electricity (alternator) is not all that efficient and converting from electricity back to mechanical energy (fan motor) is also not efficient.
The advantage of a mechanical fan is that it's simple and rarely breaks. Once in a while you might have to replace the fan clutch and that's four bolts and you're done in an hour. Since the fan clutch is a variable-clutch, fan speed increases with temperature.
The advantages of an electric fan (in my opinion) is more about packaging. If you measure the length of a mechanical fan, stem, clutch, and water pump snout that's a pretty long distance. Electrical fans are typically much more shallow and can be jammed in tight places (useful when swapping big engines into tiny engine bays). Some fans are also pusher fans, and take up no engine compartment space - they sit between the radiator and the grille.
And, from a CFM perspective, while a lot of newer electric fans have impressive numbers, the old style mechanical fan in a tight-fitting shroud typically has a 20-35% higher CFM rating.
Don't automatically assume an electric fan gives you back horsepower, because in most cases, it doesn't. But, it does solve a lot of packaging problems for sure.
Part of the reason is converting from mechanical energy to electricity (alternator) is not all that efficient and converting from electricity back to mechanical energy (fan motor) is also not efficient.
The advantage of a mechanical fan is that it's simple and rarely breaks. Once in a while you might have to replace the fan clutch and that's four bolts and you're done in an hour. Since the fan clutch is a variable-clutch, fan speed increases with temperature.
The advantages of an electric fan (in my opinion) is more about packaging. If you measure the length of a mechanical fan, stem, clutch, and water pump snout that's a pretty long distance. Electrical fans are typically much more shallow and can be jammed in tight places (useful when swapping big engines into tiny engine bays). Some fans are also pusher fans, and take up no engine compartment space - they sit between the radiator and the grille.
And, from a CFM perspective, while a lot of newer electric fans have impressive numbers, the old style mechanical fan in a tight-fitting shroud typically has a 20-35% higher CFM rating.
Don't automatically assume an electric fan gives you back horsepower, because in most cases, it doesn't. But, it does solve a lot of packaging problems for sure.
#9
The shroud increases cooling at low speeds. An electric fan is better than a fixed fan but the hydraulic fan clutch works pretty well. The biggest attraction of the electric fan is to help out at low speeds and it helps A/C performance. A fan big enough will put a pretty good load on the electrical system. In the past I have used single, duals, and an electric aux to supplement for towing. If an electric fan is going to be your only source of cooling I would go with duals. BTW all my fans came from the JY .
regards
rikard
regards
rikard
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post