Fuel filter/separator
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Western Mass
Fuel filter/separator
Finishing up my new 87 6.9 engine and I'm doing the return lines. The filter/separator were off the engine when i got it and I'm doing the lines now and realized its different then my 85's what are the two extra things on the side of it and where to i attach the return line to it. the 85 had a little plug off the brass 90 degree fitting to put the line but this one doesnt
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: Peterborough, Ontario
The plug on top is for the fuel heater. Water in fuel light hooks to the bottom cannister, or some of the one piece filters have that built in.
On some of them the return line hooks into a barbed fitting right beside the schrader valve. At least, the one I swapped the return lines and o-rings in tonight did.
On some of them the return line hooks into a barbed fitting right beside the schrader valve. At least, the one I swapped the return lines and o-rings in tonight did.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Western Mass
ok for the top plug does the old engine(85) have a fuel heater wire i can plug into 87's filter?
and i think i see the water in fuel on the bottom
I have the barbed fitting so i guess i'll put he return line on that.
Now theres just one more "thing" i don't know about about. Its the last of the three. from the front to the back it it goes Scharder, Barbed return fitting, and last but not least the mystery black "thingus", can anyone help out with what this is
and i think i see the water in fuel on the bottom
I have the barbed fitting so i guess i'll put he return line on that.
Now theres just one more "thing" i don't know about about. Its the last of the three. from the front to the back it it goes Scharder, Barbed return fitting, and last but not least the mystery black "thingus", can anyone help out with what this is
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Western Mass
yup thats what i have
So does that mean i should just use my 85's filter or are there any advantages to running the 7.3. Will my engine/truck even have the fuel heater to plug in and vacuum sensor to plug in
So does that mean i should just use my 85's filter or are there any advantages to running the 7.3. Will my engine/truck even have the fuel heater to plug in and vacuum sensor to plug in
Lead Driver
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 94
From: So. Jersey
Yes I'd use the 85. If it's the 85, NO, you wont have the fancy plug for the 7.3 filter head and no plug for the vacuum switch. Personally I prefer the 6.9 seperator because it's finer micron, alot cheaper, and is a simple spin on, no 2 part job, plus not all the other crap to leak or fail on the head as you know. I do recommend a seperate water seperator in the stock location to capture any water that might get in the fuel.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Western Mass
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: in the shadows
My filter has that same thing you pictured but is no "2-part job" - it's just one big filter. It still has a drain and water sensor on the bottom too. It does not leak anywhere, and I just had it off yesterday to check for dirt and rust inside it. But I do not know how expensive it is, as I have never changed it.
Lead Driver
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 94
From: So. Jersey
My filter has that same thing you pictured but is no "2-part job" - it's just one big filter. It still has a drain and water sensor on the bottom too. It does not leak anywhere, and I just had it off yesterday to check for dirt and rust inside it. But I do not know how expensive it is, as I have never changed it.
The price ranges from $37-43 at Napa. Of course you can find them cheaper elsewhere. I get my 6.9 filters for $11. Tough to beat.
Lead Driver
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 94
From: So. Jersey
It would but your getting what you pay for. If I were you I'd change that fram out for a Napa or Baldwin. Far more superior. It seems the fram been on there awhile so it's probably time anyways.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
consol
Modular V10 (6.8l)
3
Nov 24, 2014 11:53 AM
RFox774
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
11
Jun 25, 2014 08:46 AM
RFox774
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
Jun 24, 2014 01:01 PM
