1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

High Rise Or Low Rise Intake Manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-21-2008, 01:04 PM
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
LARIAT 85 is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
High Rise Or Low Rise Intake Manifold?

I have a 1985 Ford F150 with a 302 and 4 barrel carburetor. I currently am running an Edelbrock Performer dual plane, low-rise intake mainfold, a 1" 4-hole phenolic carb spacer, and a Holley 4 barrel carburetor.

I am going to rebuild the engine soon, and was wondering about the intake manifold. I am building this truck for low end torque, NOT for racing. Would a high-rise intake be better? Why or why not? Did Ford use a low-rise or high-rise intake stock on these trucks? What would be a better intake manifold for my application?
 
  #2  
Old 05-21-2008, 02:03 PM
mudgepondexpress's Avatar
mudgepondexpress
mudgepondexpress is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stick with what you have. That will be a great combo for your desired engine. High risers give a straighter shot at the port but most are single plane and thus are meant for higher RPMs. The dual plane intakes make more torque at lower RPMs that single planes (there is one exception, the Wieand X-Celerator) and thus there is no reason to change.

I also run a 4 hole spacer as it seems to keep the throttle more responisive at lower RPM's with a very small hit at upper levels.

Kenny
 
  #3  
Old 05-21-2008, 02:11 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,876
Received 1,596 Likes on 1,301 Posts
If you're going to rebuild, throw a little stroke into it. I like the 331 idea, not as extreme as the 347 as far as angles go, may live longer. But the displacement increase will bring the torque on at lower revs, all else being equal.

The original "high rise/medium rise/low rise" was for FE engines, specifically the 427, in Galaxies in the early '60s. Not used on other engines afaik. Use of the design quickly spread as far and wide as the 427 and 428 and the FE in general.
 
  #4  
Old 05-21-2008, 04:17 PM
ibleedblue1385's Avatar
ibleedblue1385
ibleedblue1385 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Parma, MI
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
x2 on running what you already have.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1986F150six
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
25
01-16-2015 05:47 PM
The Confederate
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
17
03-29-2012 03:34 PM
LARIAT 85
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-01-2011 03:35 PM
4t6ford
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
01-26-2005 10:33 AM



Quick Reply: High Rise Or Low Rise Intake Manifold?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.