2016 F-150 Pro Trailer Assist?? 2017 SD?
#16
I imagine that's going to be true eventually. EPS has its advantages, but the downside is replacement cost. I haven't looked up every possible application, but the EPS motor isn't separately serviceable in the F150 or the Sienna that we used to have. Both require the replacement of the entire assembly when they fail, and the part is over $1,000 in both cases.
#17
#18
#19
#20
I ordered the pro back up assist on my 2016 F-150 Lariat 163" wheel base. and personally feel it was a waste of money. May be ok for small empty low profile trailer. However for full size 21-ft enclosed car trailer and 21-ft boat you are better off using mirrors as you normally would. It is more of a novelty than anything useful. I do like the back up camera for backing up and connection to the hitch.
#21
Have you guys seen this feature on the 2016 F-150's?
I don't think the 2017 SD will have this feature but I think I would much rather have the camera (available with the 2017 SD) mounted on the back of my trailer (28' Enclosed Race Trailer) so i can actually see behind the trailer vs. looking at the front of the trailer via the tail gate camera.
What are your thoughts?
2016 Ford F-150 Pro Trailer Backup Assist - YouTube
2016 Ford F-150 Ford Pro Trailer Backup Assist Test Drive - YouTube
I don't think the 2017 SD will have this feature but I think I would much rather have the camera (available with the 2017 SD) mounted on the back of my trailer (28' Enclosed Race Trailer) so i can actually see behind the trailer vs. looking at the front of the trailer via the tail gate camera.
What are your thoughts?
2016 Ford F-150 Pro Trailer Backup Assist - YouTube
2016 Ford F-150 Ford Pro Trailer Backup Assist Test Drive - YouTube
There is more about that on the second link that I posted here:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post16381623
#23
We have it on our 2016 F-150. I'm basically of the mindset that if you need this system, you probably shouldn't be towing.
I think the electric pump on hydraulic system would not save much fuel. Losing the hydraulic fluid means there is that much less resistance the system has to move, which creates the fuel savings. When the electric motor is not active (you're not steering), there is no additional electrical draw to add resistance to the alternator. I can guarantee you will see electric steering on the Super Duty. The Government and manufacturers are dead set on making cars automated - and being able to steer themselves is a critical piece, obviously. I don't have much interest in a self-driving vehicle. Loss of personal freedom.
I think the electric pump on hydraulic system would not save much fuel. Losing the hydraulic fluid means there is that much less resistance the system has to move, which creates the fuel savings. When the electric motor is not active (you're not steering), there is no additional electrical draw to add resistance to the alternator. I can guarantee you will see electric steering on the Super Duty. The Government and manufacturers are dead set on making cars automated - and being able to steer themselves is a critical piece, obviously. I don't have much interest in a self-driving vehicle. Loss of personal freedom.
#24
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post