1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

1951 FORD 4x4 F6 Marmon-Herrington

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #121  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:38 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,702
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
Rod's Glenmist Green F-3 now hits Ebay. Seller lists it as a Power Wagon thinking nobody knows what a M-H is. Groan. Stu

Dodge Power Wagon | eBay
 
  #122  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:48 PM
jmadsen's Avatar
jmadsen
jmadsen is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,315
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
At least he got rid of those uni directional tires.
Looks better now!. 27k better?

Is that Rods tow rig in the last picture? He sure has /had some neat trucks.. Would love to see that collection in person.
 
  #123  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:56 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,702
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
Originally Posted by jmadsen
At least he got rid of those uni directional tires.
Looks better now!. 27k better?

Is that Rods tow rig in the last picture? He sure has /had some neat trucks.. Would love to see that collection in person.
The 9.00 x 16" NDT military tires were on the yellow F-2. F-2 M-Hs have the Budd 47210 16s that give a world of tire options. Why Rod mounted the NDTs on it I don't know. The F-3 has the correct Budd 59340s with iirc 7.50 x 17" Coursers. The F-8 was his too. Mark Mossell, Bob Jones and I made a couple of visits to Rod a few years ago. I spent most of my visits laying on my back under the F-2 and F-3. Stu
 
  #124  
Old 06-04-2016, 02:04 AM
Mixer man's Avatar
Mixer man
Mixer man is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bothell & Silverdale, WA
Posts: 4,920
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Isn't a F-2 a 3/4 ton, and a F-3 a one ton?
 
  #125  
Old 06-04-2016, 02:19 AM
casper1999's Avatar
casper1999
casper1999 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 900
Received 67 Likes on 34 Posts
Man, those are some beautiful trucks!!! I hope the new owners can appreciate them for what they are and what they represent.
 
  #126  
Old 06-04-2016, 02:30 AM
casper1999's Avatar
casper1999
casper1999 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 900
Received 67 Likes on 34 Posts
Mixer man, It's my understanding that an F3 is a "Heavy Duty" 3/4 ton. I'm not sure just what the difference is between an F2 and F3 but suspect it has to do with the suspension and load capacity, axle bearings,spring pack,etc....
 
  #127  
Old 06-04-2016, 05:36 AM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,702
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
In the US market a 2WD F-2 is a light duty 3/4 ton, while the F-3 is a heavy duty 3/4. The F-4 was a one ton. In Canada the 2WD F-3/F-68/M-68/M-3 was called a one ton, and no F-2 was sold there. I don't recall what the F-4/F-105 was termed.

But, M-H upgraded the weight rating of their F-2 model from 5700 lbs to the 6800 lb rating of the F-3. Heavy duty springs were spec'd. The only differences between F-2 and F-3 M-Hs are the wheels, and rear shock absorbers. The F-2 got the 16" Budd 47210s, while F-3s got the 17" Budd 44820s or 59340s. F-3s got no rear shocks as per standard Ford practice, although they were optional on 2WD F-3s. The M-H F-2s, having rear lift blocks, got specially designed lower shock mounts that have an upward bend at the shock mounting point where standard 2WD F-2s got shock mounts that bend downward. No idea why the small differences if the intent was to rate them both at 6800 lbs.

Sorry to hijack your thread. Stu
 
  #128  
Old 06-07-2016, 07:46 PM
1x1_Speed_Craig's Avatar
1x1_Speed_Craig
1x1_Speed_Craig is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dirtbag
I ended up having to run the adapter plate on the inside of the wheel. With it mounted on the outside, the bolts/nuts that hold it in place would contact the brake drum and cause mounting interference. With the plate mounted inside the wheel how it is, the inboard side of the wheel lip (the outer edge) is exactly the same distance from the frame as the stock wheel was. So frame to wheel clearance hasn't changed any. Also, the wheels do not stick out past the body. They are almost even with the fender now.










Very cool truck, Dirtbag. Question...I'm looking at the same wheels for a Super Duty-based vintage FC170 Patina Rod I'm building. I can't seem to find wheel offset information anywhere online for the 20" x 10" aluminum MRAP wheels. Is there any chance you could post a couple measurements to the wheel mounting surface?

I also plan on using 3/8" steel adapter plates (but I'll be buying mine from Western Canadian Rockwell vs. making them).

I'm in Michigan, too, BTW (Grand Rapids).

Thanks man!
Craig
 
  #129  
Old 06-07-2016, 09:17 PM
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
bobj49f2 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Posts: 16,007
Received 2,059 Likes on 804 Posts
I'm surprised none of you guys mentioned the truck is on eBay right now. He's got it listed as a Dodge Power Wagon for some kind of twisted logic;

Dodge Power Wagon | eBay
 
  #130  
Old 06-07-2016, 09:44 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,702
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
Go up to post 121 at the top of the page, Bob. And now there is a 51 F-3 M-H project truck listed on eBay too. Stu

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-Ford-Other-Pickups-/222141673244?&_trksid=p2056016.m2518.l4276
http://s261.photobucket.com/user/bur...?sort=3&page=1
 
  #131  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:38 PM
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
bobj49f2 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Posts: 16,007
Received 2,059 Likes on 804 Posts
Stu I missed your post at 121. I should have known you'd be on top of it
 
  #132  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:45 PM
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
bobj49f2 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Posts: 16,007
Received 2,059 Likes on 804 Posts
Stu, I wouldn't mind getting the project truck. I guess I'll never learn.
 
  #133  
Old 06-07-2016, 10:50 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,702
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
Sure. Text messages have been circulating all evening about it among our M-H guys, and a young man on Fordbarn sounds like a bidder. It has some unique features that make it real interesting. Deserves its own thread. Stu
 
  #134  
Old 06-26-2016, 10:05 AM
Dirtbag's Avatar
Dirtbag
Dirtbag is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Been awhile since last I checked in, time to give an update. I swaped out the throttle linkage, and now have it to the proper (left) side of the carburetor. *wow shocked* *what a difference it made. *This is my first flathead, and from it's previous performance, I assumed these things were just way under powered and just plan slow. I chalked it up as it being a 70+ year old motor (59AB, although it looks to be a newer rebuild) Now that the linkage is properly routed, this thing rocks. The first initial test run after the change, I was at the end of the driveway, seen the gap in traffic, (second gear take off) dropped the throttle like normal to jump into my place in traffic and the back duals lit up. I couldn't believe the performance difference, I literally was suprised. I didn't know any better before, as I had nothing to go off of, but I bet the old rigged up linkage was only letting the carburetor opperate at 1/3 to 1/2 throttle. I assumed all these old trucks were just plain really slow.....not so any more.*


Don't get me wrong, I'm not out hotroding the truck (I drive it like the antique farm truck it is) but I was so use to having to push the pedal down to get the thing up to speed. I'm very happy with it's new found power, I can get up and keep up with traffic now :-)
 
  #135  
Old 06-26-2016, 10:50 AM
38 coupe's Avatar
38 coupe
38 coupe is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 0
Received 109 Likes on 57 Posts
You just discovered one of two main reasons flathead Fords were and are more popular than any other make from that era. The other reason is they are built tougher and last longer. Puts a big smile on your face
 


Quick Reply: 1951 FORD 4x4 F6 Marmon-Herrington



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.