When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Call it BS all you want and stay in the dark about it. Personally, I wouldn't say it was defective... not just well engineered. Simple aging, heat cycles, and accumulation of dust/dirt on terminals results in marginal increases in resistance... resistance equals heat. Heat is what that lil bimetallic strip reacts to and the lights cycle on and off.
No, read what I wrote, you're making my point. If they were defective from the factory why wasn't there a recall? It's not a great design, I agree. But it works fine.
No, read what I wrote, you're making my point. If they were defective from the factory why wasn't there a recall? It's not a great design, I agree. But it works fine.
Yeah I read it.... but it's not 'defective' per se.
I bet if it's kept dust free and cooled with a constant stream of air that the thermal breaker wouldn't cycle.
I bet if it's kept dust free and cooled with a constant stream of air that the thermal breaker wouldn't cycle.
Except, the breaker tripping is a symptom of a problem, not the problem. I bet if the grounds and connections are good the current won't spike to begin with, and the breaker won't trip. See where I'm goin' with that?
As mentioned "it takes a while for it to start" i.e. intermittent headlights weren't initially part of the standard equipment package. It's easy to tell that copper wire was considered a semi-precious metal with automakers, using the minimum gauge and barely adequate when new.
Relays are used for this reason, agreed. Even so, corrosion is still why there are so many electrical problems then and now.
Early on replaced floor and headlight switches in the 64. Been running 30 amp generator and halogen lamps ever since for roughly 20 years, part of that as daily (and nightly) driver, cross country trips, etc. No problems.