1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

EBPS/EBPV delete dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-04-2013, 09:33 AM
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Tact is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eads, TN
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
EBPS/EBPV delete dilemma

I'm trying to research how to get better mpg on my '03 7.3, and I once again came upon this debate/dilemma. I've read and read and read till I'm thoroughly confused on what exactly to do about these...the sensor and valve. Cap or not/one or both, buy a bypass and install, clean the sensor and tube again?

Will I even see any improvements? Last time I cleaned the sensor and tube I couldn't tell of any improvement in mpg or performance. I have even read that by deleting the sensor or valve that it actually hurt their mpg and performance.

Is there any true knowledge on this and is it even beneficial to mess with? What is the CORRECT method of deleting them if it will be beneficial?
 
  #2  
Old 11-04-2013, 10:09 AM
BWST's Avatar
BWST
BWST is offline
Got Data?
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Posts: 3,293
Received 474 Likes on 326 Posts
I hear you on the confusion, but I think the evidence leans in favor of keeping the EBPS and keeping that tube clean. If you can get access to AE and verify the sensor reading and MAP are within a volt or so, that is a good thing. Mine was off by 3 volts before I changed it. My MPGs have never been great (13-14), but I've tried to get the truck to 100 percent anyway.

deleting the valve is more of a preference for how you use the truck. I dont think it's a factor for MPG. I deleted it and went with a hi-flow outlet and non-EPBV turbo pedistal to eliminate a source of oil leak (my actuator was leaking), and to eliminate the possible restriction from the valve in the exhaust stream, helping EGTs a tiny bit. I may eventually put it back in to use with a decel tune as an exhaust brake. I live in Seattle and so it does not get cold enough here to use the valve as it was intended, as a warm-up assist.
 
  #3  
Old 11-04-2013, 10:20 AM
spongecop's Avatar
spongecop
spongecop is offline
Semper Fi

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I did mine over a year ago and have not noticed any MPG change. Was just easier to gut it when I rebuilt my turbo to avoid future oil leaks. In TX so so cold issues here.
 
  #4  
Old 11-04-2013, 11:15 AM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,450
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
If it were me I would delete the valve. But LEAVE THE SENSOR. You cant (or shouldnt) delete it. The people who write tunes (and the factory tune) use the EPBS to determine fueling.
 
  #5  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:18 PM
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Tact is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eads, TN
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by A/Ox4
If it were me I would delete the valve. But LEAVE THE SENSOR. You cant (or shouldnt) delete it. The people who write tunes (and the factory tune) use the EPBS to determine fueling.
If I were to delete the valve, what is the proper/easiest way?
 
  #6  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:22 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,450
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Proper way is to buy a non EBPV flange and install that. Its also easiest, but more expensive.
 
  #7  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:27 PM
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Tact is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eads, TN
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by A/Ox4
Proper way is to buy a non EBPV flange and install that. Its also easiest, but more expensive.
That ain't what I was looking for.

I'm searching for the procedure but haven't found it yet. If anyone can post up a link to the thread where it has been deleted?
 
  #8  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:30 PM
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
A/Ox4 is offline
9 ECHO 1

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,450
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Here are the two parts:

Riffraff Diesel: Garrett GTP38 High Flow Outlet

Riffraff Diesel: Garrett Non-EBPV/ Blank Pedestal 99.5-03

The other option is welding. I have seen these two items bundled on ebay for $100 before.
 
  #9  
Old 11-04-2013, 12:36 PM
Mr. Finch's Avatar
Mr. Finch
Mr. Finch is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
personally i have left mine alone, it doesnt leak, and i just take a blowgun and snake to the tube once in a while. i live in northern illinois, and a warm truck gets better mileage than a cold one, so personally i feel having better mpgs from a faster warm up out ways the "loss" in mpg from the "drag" in the exhaust (if it is really enough to affect anything).
 
  #10  
Old 11-04-2013, 09:52 PM
MTDewX's Avatar
MTDewX
MTDewX is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have read some have welded the holes closed cause they didn't want to buy a delete pedestal. not sure all the details on it, I considered it, but dont weld and own a van now so I can't even delete mine. so I spend the same $100 that would have been for a pedestal for the rebuilt kit.

side thought, cleaning the tube is easy, but the sensor can be tricky to not ruin the diapram inside.

I just bought a new sensor after I pulled my tube. RUSTED beyond cleaning. so I got a new tube and sensor.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
creich68
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
12-09-2015 08:21 PM
e350daBeast
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
07-16-2014 08:24 PM
jasonch
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
11-24-2009 10:12 PM
hucka1a
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
05-31-2008 01:14 PM
JIM ROLAND
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
10-11-2007 11:02 PM



Quick Reply: EBPS/EBPV delete dilemma



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.