OPIS: California Low-Carbon Fuel Will Mean Higher Pump Prices
#1
OPIS: California Low-Carbon Fuel Will Mean Higher Pump Prices
10/4/2012
Californians could face even higher gasoline and diesel costs when new low carbon fuel regulations gain traction Jan. 1, warn fuel experts at the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS), which says studies show price hikes of as much as $1 per gallon for gasoline and $2 per gallon for diesel could be on the way
The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard aims to cut greenhouse-gas producing emissions from motor fuel by 10% between now and 2020. It was part of Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act.
It aims to do this by setting an increasingly tighter cap on carbon emissions from motor fuels for sale in the state. Alternative fuels such ethanol or biodiesel are assigned Carbon Intensity (CI) scores based on the amount of carbon dioxide they pout out. Fuels that fall below CARBs cap generate credits and those who have a CI higher than the cap generate a deficit.
Critics say the low carbon fuel standard will have the unintended side effect of driving up pump prices as restrictions on crude oil feedstock tighten supply. High-carbon crudes like those coming from oil shale fields will result in a higher CI rating for the petroleum products they produce.
Others predict that the new standard will drive growth in the biofuels industry.
A recent report from Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) notes that biofuel production capacity has increased from 437 million gallons last year to more than 685 million gallons. By 2015, the industry has the potential to produce 1.6 billion to 2.6 billion gallons -- and California's LCFS as well as the federal Renewable Fuel Standard create an incentive for investors and biofuel companies to continue to innovate and increase biofuel production, which in turn they say will drive down costs and carbon emissions.
from TruckInfo.com
Californians could face even higher gasoline and diesel costs when new low carbon fuel regulations gain traction Jan. 1, warn fuel experts at the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS), which says studies show price hikes of as much as $1 per gallon for gasoline and $2 per gallon for diesel could be on the way
The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard aims to cut greenhouse-gas producing emissions from motor fuel by 10% between now and 2020. It was part of Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act.
It aims to do this by setting an increasingly tighter cap on carbon emissions from motor fuels for sale in the state. Alternative fuels such ethanol or biodiesel are assigned Carbon Intensity (CI) scores based on the amount of carbon dioxide they pout out. Fuels that fall below CARBs cap generate credits and those who have a CI higher than the cap generate a deficit.
Critics say the low carbon fuel standard will have the unintended side effect of driving up pump prices as restrictions on crude oil feedstock tighten supply. High-carbon crudes like those coming from oil shale fields will result in a higher CI rating for the petroleum products they produce.
Others predict that the new standard will drive growth in the biofuels industry.
A recent report from Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) notes that biofuel production capacity has increased from 437 million gallons last year to more than 685 million gallons. By 2015, the industry has the potential to produce 1.6 billion to 2.6 billion gallons -- and California's LCFS as well as the federal Renewable Fuel Standard create an incentive for investors and biofuel companies to continue to innovate and increase biofuel production, which in turn they say will drive down costs and carbon emissions.
from TruckInfo.com
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
they have all ready taken care of that there closing the coal power plants.
Institute for Energy Research | Powerplants to be closed as a result of EPA’s regulations
– Barack Obama speaking to San Francisco Chronicle, January 2008 **Update June 12, 2012**
Download the Updated Report as a PDF
More than 34 gigawatts (GW) of electrical generating capacity are now set to retire because of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (colloquially called Utility MACT)[1] and the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)[2] regulations. Most of these retirements will come from coal-fired power plants, shuttering over 10 percent of the U.S.’s coal-fired generating capacity.
This report is an update of a report we issued in October 2011.[3] Last October the original report, we calculated that 28.3 GW of generating capacity would close as a result of EPA’s regulations. At the time, we warned that “this number will grow as plant operators continue to release their EPA compliance plans.” Unfortunately, this statement has proven to be true. This update, a mere eight months later, shows that 34.7 GW of electrical generating capacity will close—a 6.4 GW increase.
According to EPA, their modeling of Utility MACT and CSAPR indicates that these regulations will only shutter 9.5 GW of electricity generation capacity. But events in the real world already show that EPA’s modeling is a gross underestimate.
Institute for Energy Research | Powerplants to be closed as a result of EPA’s regulations
– Barack Obama speaking to San Francisco Chronicle, January 2008 **Update June 12, 2012**
Download the Updated Report as a PDF
More than 34 gigawatts (GW) of electrical generating capacity are now set to retire because of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (colloquially called Utility MACT)[1] and the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)[2] regulations. Most of these retirements will come from coal-fired power plants, shuttering over 10 percent of the U.S.’s coal-fired generating capacity.
This report is an update of a report we issued in October 2011.[3] Last October the original report, we calculated that 28.3 GW of generating capacity would close as a result of EPA’s regulations. At the time, we warned that “this number will grow as plant operators continue to release their EPA compliance plans.” Unfortunately, this statement has proven to be true. This update, a mere eight months later, shows that 34.7 GW of electrical generating capacity will close—a 6.4 GW increase.
According to EPA, their modeling of Utility MACT and CSAPR indicates that these regulations will only shutter 9.5 GW of electricity generation capacity. But events in the real world already show that EPA’s modeling is a gross underestimate.
#10
I knew I had to leave California about twenty years ago...bought acreage in Nevada, then retired and took my pension with me.
Yep, they try that **** here too! What really pisses me off is when they move here and then try to change things here so it will be screwed up like California. My truck's bumper sticker: "We don't give a damn how you did it in California"
What makes me mad is the tree huggers in surrounding states wanna mimick it!
#13
#15
Awesome. Isn't CA just for celebrities?
Here in the Cotulla / Carrizo Springs area of TX, the oil and gas industry is booming. Thousands of jobs have been created. The bunny humpers, however, discovered a field mouse no one has ever heard of. If they get their way, they will shut everything down!
Here in the Cotulla / Carrizo Springs area of TX, the oil and gas industry is booming. Thousands of jobs have been created. The bunny humpers, however, discovered a field mouse no one has ever heard of. If they get their way, they will shut everything down!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nlemerise
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
08-29-2014 06:55 AM
ag30265
Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
3
02-06-2008 11:24 AM