11-19-2014, 06:22 PM
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Fuel System Guides
- Fuel System Specifications
Step by step instructions for do-it-yourself repairs
Browse all: Fuel System Guides
Fuel system problems, warranty possibly denied
#121
02-02-2012, 08:04 PM
Question.
I think most of us (including myself) agree that water did not cause Rick HPFP failure. Ford says it did. At that point it's all fine and good. Then you file a claim with your insurance company and say that "fuel contaminated with water" caused the damage.
Who is liable for the fraud that has been committed against the insurance company?
Thanks
I think most of us (including myself) agree that water did not cause Rick HPFP failure. Ford says it did. At that point it's all fine and good. Then you file a claim with your insurance company and say that "fuel contaminated with water" caused the damage.
Who is liable for the fraud that has been committed against the insurance company?
Thanks
#122
02-02-2012, 08:34 PM
Question.
I think most of us (including myself) agree that water did not cause Rick HPFP failure. Ford says it did. At that point it's all fine and good. Then you file a claim with your insurance company and say that "fuel contaminated with water" caused the damage.
Who is liable for the fraud that has been committed against the insurance company?
Thanks
I think most of us (including myself) agree that water did not cause Rick HPFP failure. Ford says it did. At that point it's all fine and good. Then you file a claim with your insurance company and say that "fuel contaminated with water" caused the damage.
Who is liable for the fraud that has been committed against the insurance company?
Thanks
Ninerbike has it right. Ford did not test or analyze any parts or the fuel sample. Blanket denial. If the insurance company wanted to pursue the issue...it would be Ford's responsibility to defend their decision...to my knowledge, this did not happen...
...now about the Nestle water bottle with an ounce of water in it...that may be a different fraud question....
Regards
#123
02-02-2012, 08:59 PM
This was brought up before. The insurance company recognizes Ford as the expert in this regard. Ford says "WIF, source unknown". Owner files claim, adjuster comes out and looks at truck and reads Ford's report. Claim is approved..No fraud on owners part...and the owner discussed this at length with the insurance company.
Ninerbike has it right. Ford did not test or analyze any parts or the fuel sample. Blanket denial. If the insurance company wanted to pursue the issue...it would be Ford's responsibility to defend their decision...to my knowledge, this did not happen...
...now about the Nestle water bottle with an ounce of water in it...that may be a different fraud question....
Regards
Ninerbike has it right. Ford did not test or analyze any parts or the fuel sample. Blanket denial. If the insurance company wanted to pursue the issue...it would be Ford's responsibility to defend their decision...to my knowledge, this did not happen...
...now about the Nestle water bottle with an ounce of water in it...that may be a different fraud question....
Regards
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
