Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1.7 roller rockers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-13-2012, 12:18 PM
fosgate forever's Avatar
fosgate forever
fosgate forever is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did it on the mustangs cause i dont have that luxury, taller valve covers(which i dont like btw) mean an intake spacers, which means a cowl hood, which means paint etc etc.

Plus i'd rather buy another set of $10 gaskets then a set of $70-100 valve covers that i dont need. Chances are they will clear, just for some extra spacing an extra gasket works. Especially if it comes down to driving the truck or waiting on summit.
 
  #17  
Old 01-13-2012, 12:34 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thats cool , i just do it the other way around , tall covers , intake heat spacer , adds a little runner length helps keep the upper cooler , 2in cowl hood also helps keep it cool , thats the way i have allways done it , just me ....
 
  #18  
Old 01-13-2012, 01:03 PM
fosgate forever's Avatar
fosgate forever
fosgate forever is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
Thats cool , i just do it the other way around , tall covers , intake heat spacer , adds a little runner length helps keep the upper cooler , 2in cowl hood also helps keep it cool , thats the way i have allways done it , just me ....
I've never seen performance gains from an intake spacer. I didnt want a cowl hood on the race car, that would create a high and low pressure area in the engine bay. Foxes have it bad enough with the high pressure area that lifts the front end at 130+ That would hurt areo dynamics. And again I hate the taller valve covers. The street car though has a cowl hood, I just like the short valve covers, and spending less money when I can.

If it was a all out drag car i'd see no reason not to do it your way though.
 
  #19  
Old 01-13-2012, 01:44 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't know if theres any gain from the spacer , not something you can feel from the seat , i like the tall welded covers , they have the allen head bolts that go thought the top of the cover and seal up nice , easy to get to when you need to take a look , they don't come with any holes so you can drill them where you want , i just like the clearence with the 1.72 scorpion RR and screw in studs
 
  #20  
Old 01-13-2012, 01:55 PM
fosgate forever's Avatar
fosgate forever
fosgate forever is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 1.72 SVO rockers, with studs on my X heads cleared the stock fox valve covers after some work. I could say i did it for the sleeper look but that kinda dies when you have a blower and aftercooler crammed into the bay
 
  #21  
Old 01-13-2012, 03:59 PM
73FOMO's Avatar
73FOMO
73FOMO is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, AL
Posts: 1,462
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by fosgate forever
Doubling the valve cover gasket will give enough clearance too, and come under the stock intake.
Ditto...that's what I did with no issues.
 
  #22  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:00 PM
jk89cat's Avatar
jk89cat
jk89cat is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: vernon hills IL
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BRay09
I cleared crane 1.7rr in my 351w truck with no problems... stock valve covers

i 2nd this message , pedistal type
 
  #23  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:51 PM
mustangman65_79's Avatar
mustangman65_79
mustangman65_79 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Myrtle Point, Or
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, on a 302, even with a intake spacer, it should still clear the stock hood. The 351 has the same intake, and those motors sit almost an inch taller.
 
  #24  
Old 01-13-2012, 05:30 PM
BRay09's Avatar
BRay09
BRay09 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mustangman65_79
The 351 has the same intake, and those motors sit almost an inch taller.
the runners are totally different between the 302 & 351w truck intakes. May be the same height, but they are no where near the "same"
 
  #25  
Old 01-13-2012, 05:50 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mustangman65_79
FYI, on a 302, even with a intake spacer, it should still clear the stock hood. The 351 has the same intake, and those motors sit almost an inch taller.
I think we were talking fox body mustang hoods , the truck has no problem with clearence ...
 
  #26  
Old 01-13-2012, 10:08 PM
fosgate forever's Avatar
fosgate forever
fosgate forever is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
I think we were talking fox body mustang hoods , the truck has no problem with clearence ...
I know I was, the truck has plenty of room to cram a m112 blower underneath. So spacers, larger valve covers etc. Are no big deal.
 
  #27  
Old 01-14-2012, 03:12 AM
mustangman65_79's Avatar
mustangman65_79
mustangman65_79 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Myrtle Point, Or
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRay09
the runners are totally different between the 302 & 351w truck intakes. May be the same height, but they are no where near the "same"
sorry, I didn't mean swapable, I just meant size wise.

Originally Posted by lew52
I think we were talking fox body mustang hoods , the truck has no problem with clearence ...
ah ok
 
  #28  
Old 01-14-2012, 09:41 PM
deereford's Avatar
deereford
deereford is offline
4th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input. Now all I have to do is find a set of rockers that I can afford. Brad
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1bad67sbf
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
06-01-2010 09:24 PM
Goodold71
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
08-06-2003 08:14 PM
hybridf250
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
9
07-03-2003 07:29 PM
phantom429
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
6
03-14-2003 09:29 PM



Quick Reply: 1.7 roller rockers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.