When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
does the ip rob that much power? i didn't figure it anything over 3hp at full tilt
anyways, any updates?
A 12mm P7100 takes about 7hp.
As far as the IDI making more HP per cc than the CTD, its kind of a moot "argument". The CTD has no issues getting the fuel it needs to make the power you want, and it gets better mileage doing it.
The issue with doing a p-pump conversion in my eyes is the return on investment. You now have a pump that can fuel a 2500hp motor, but a motor that can only handle about 500hp, maybe a little more on a big single. Kind of pointless.
However, if you're a crazy bastage like Racin is, and I once was... maybe its just worth doing it for you
The big bore DB2 sounds like a winner to me. Should keep the internals simpler than the DB4 route. I too am curious about how much fuel you estimate this big bore pump will push.
Originally Posted by RacinNdrummin
Like I said, 180-190cc's at peak, but that is going to be determined by leakdown past the plungers... Fotunately, the plunger area is the same as the DB4, but the leakdown potential is less because the total circumfrence of the plungers is less... This might mean more flow... I wont know until I get a working model completed and on the stand... I have 2 sets of plungers cut right now, I just need to get the parts to EDM, have them fitted, and have the pumps built.
We posted at the same time yesterday so I didn't get read your post above mine.
Thanks man... I dont think its going to have a DB4 on the dyno... My focus has turned torwards the big bore DB2 stuff... Its the only thing that makes sense in my opinion. It liberates me from the whims of Stanadyne, and with a million+ pumps out there, and the benefit of having competent EDM and grinding shops nearby, It just leaves me with having a competent shop to calibrate the pumps... My focus is having a pump stand here in the near future, that way the quality control is up to me, and Im not relying on somebody else to hold the same standards I do... Couple that with eliminating the middle-man and you have a win-win for all of us IDI guys... It will take a little work, but sense when has a little work hurt anybody ...
That makes sense. Well then I look forward to seeing how those perform as well then. And as far as eliminating the middle man, that makes stuff more efficient and probably more cost effective. It makes sense to me...