Notices

1.5 or 2 Ton Truck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2017 | 01:49 PM
  #1  
Steve1920's Avatar
Steve1920
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
1.5 or 2 Ton Truck?

Guy's,


How do you tell the difference between a 1 & 1/2 ton and 2 ton truck?
Is it the number of leaves in the rear springs? Or is it different rear axles? Or both?


I have 7.50-20's and my rear axle is a two piece- the halves bolt together, like a Model T rear axle.


I ask because I've now seen a number of 2 tons on here and by eye I can not see a difference, other than the axle. Gary's 2 ton on the trailer, that he sold, looks like mine, except for the rear end. So I'm confused a bit I guess.


I would just like to verify what I have. Thanks.


Steve
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
47COE's Avatar
47COE
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 2
From: Oregon
What year truck?
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 08:50 AM
  #3  
Steve1920's Avatar
Steve1920
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Ooops, I forgot to put the year in the post- sorry.


It's a '41. And it doesn't "look like" Gary's, just the tires and wheels look to be the same. Just trying to differentiate between the two tonnage ratings.


Thanks


Steve
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 09:48 AM
  #4  
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
Marmon-Herrington Man
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,986
Likes: 444
From: Central Illinois
Club FTE Gold Member
I have the 1941 Ford V-8 Trucks & Commercial Cars Sales Manual and Reference Book. Nowhere in it do I find the terms 1.5 ton and 2 ton. This is unlike Ford's clear descriptions of the 3/4 ton and one ton models that shared many features. Instead the book describes features of the 134" and 158" wheelbase models, and lists optional features that would add to the gvwr of the trucks. Such as frame reinforcements, stouter springs, two speed axles, etc. In common practice a 158" wheelbase model with optional upgrades could be a 2 ton.

I know we've seen some trucks of this era that have 6 lug x 8.75" pattern wheels and hubs, but I find nothing regarding this contained in the manual. My belief has been that truck's like this were military spec, or perhaps of Canadian origin. I know too that we've had mention of Canadian 3 ton models that perhaps were also military specification. Stu
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
Steve1920's Avatar
Steve1920
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Very interesting info! For the record, I have five lug wheels.


I'd love to get a close look at a bare frame or two and compare springs, frame set up, etc. There are probably a lot of folks out there who are uncertain of their weight rating/model.


Thanks for the reply.


Steve
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 11:41 AM
  #6  
47COE's Avatar
47COE
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 2
From: Oregon
There is no mention of 1.5 or 2 ton truck ratings in the 40, 41, or 42 truck brochures. Does that mean that those years had no rating? Or were they all 1.5 ton? I don't know.

The 47 brochure does mention 1.5 ton and 2 ton ratings. See:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...rd-trucks.html
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 11:27 AM
  #7  
Steve1920's Avatar
Steve1920
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Maybe it will just be simpler to say its a "41 Ford flat bed" if someone asks, lol.


It comes off the tongue easier than "41 Ford one and a half ton truck"!


Thanks for the info.


Steve
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 11:57 AM
  #8  
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
Marmon-Herrington Man
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,986
Likes: 444
From: Central Illinois
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 47COE
There is no mention of 1.5 or 2 ton truck ratings in the 40, 41, or 42 truck brochures. Does that mean that those years had no rating? Or were they all 1.5 ton? I don't know.

The 47 brochure does mention 1.5 ton and 2 ton ratings. See:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...rd-trucks.html
This is interesting. I have the 1946 sales handbook, like the above '41, and it too makes no mention of the 1.5 or 2 ton designations. Wonder if it's a new concept for '47, or maybe just different marketing groups that created the different references. Stu
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 19, 2017 | 01:38 PM
  #9  
WQ59B's Avatar
WQ59B
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 259
Likes: 2
The whole '1.5T' and 2T' "rating" has been a puzzle to me also.

47COE's link to the '47 brochure shows the '2T' has the 2-spd rear and aux springs... but then mentions they're avail on the 1.5T. Would having that not instantly make the 1.5T a 2T? Same frame, same brakes, same engine... in '47 the 2T got a vacuum booster but there wasn't one for my year (40).
From here, it all smells like marketing.

The other question is, even if engineering had some input into the '1.5T' and '2T' designations.... what do those numbers even signify?? How did my '40 get registered at 8 tons loaded when new?
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 02:25 PM
  #10  
DonnieFord's Avatar
DonnieFord
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Stirling
is the naming of the two and three ton trucks a purely Canadian thing? Mine is a three ton.
I have a Canadian parts book for ford trucks made in Canada that clearly shows the 1.5, 2 and 3 ton variations, and my truck is badged as a three ton.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2017 | 03:48 PM
  #11  
47COE's Avatar
47COE
Mountain Pass
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 2
From: Oregon
Looking at my 47 truck operators manual, there is no mention of 1 1/2 or 2 ton ratings. What they do have is gross vehicle weight ratings (GVWR) for various models. Within a model, the GVWR listed varies by the tires used.



Back when I first registered my truck for farm plates, they asked what tires it had and then registered it for 18,000 pounds. That is still the weight on the registration 42 years later.

I have 7.50x20 on the front, and 8.25x20 on the rear. Ford says that is good for 15,000. The state of Oregon says 18,000. I personally prefer to not exceed 13,000.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2017 | 07:27 AM
  #12  
Professor M's Avatar
Professor M
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
I know this has been posted before and hashed over in other threads, but I have been confused by this as well on the 42-47 trucks. It would seem the main delineation between 1.5 and 2 ton is the GVWR, but as 47COE points out this is highly dependent on tires. This literature also mentioned the 2-speed, reinforced frame, brake booster, springs, etc. and lists 14,500 lbs GVWR for the 2 ton model. The original title for my truck called it a 1 1/2 ton, but the rating plate on my glove box says 14,500 lbs GVWR. I also have the 2-speed, brake booster and all the other 2 ton options, does this make it a 2 ton?

I agree... smells like marketing, probably similar for the 40-41.

In NY I have passenger plates. The gals at the DMV didn't know what to do with my registration... I know I should not be hauling on them, but I've never seen DOT on the back roads around here.

 
Reply
Old May 23, 2017 | 06:53 PM
  #13  
white 66's Avatar
white 66
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 916
Likes: 18
From: Colorado
1.5 vs 2....

Not sure either but my title also says 1.5. Weight matches and so do the wheels and tires.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2017 | 07:37 PM
  #14  
46Fire's Avatar
46Fire
New User
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Medford Oregon
1946 Truck

Originally Posted by 47COE
Looking at my 47 truck operators manual, there is no mention of 1 1/2 or 2 ton ratings. What they do have is gross vehicle weight ratings (GVWR) for various models. Within a model, the GVWR listed varies by the tires used.

Back when I first registered my truck for farm plates, they asked what tires it had and then registered it for 18,000 pounds. That is still the weight on the registration 42 years later.

I have 7.50x20 on the front, and 8.25x20 on the rear. Ford says that is good for 15,000. The state of Oregon says 18,000. I personally prefer to not exceed 13,000.
Hi there.

We just acquired a 1946 Ford Fire Engine based on a Ford commercial chassis. Wheelbase is 134", more or less (measured with tape measure). Tires on front are 7.50x20 with HUGE lug nuts; Dual tires on rear. We're trying to locate a chassis repair manual or ANYTHING that will help us to restore this baby. I notice that you're also in Oregon, so perhaps close enough for you to come see it here in Medford Oregon. Here's a web page showing some photos:
1946 Ford Fire Truck

Any help will be appreciated.

Rick
Medford Oregon

 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2017 | 10:01 AM
  #15  
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,104
Likes: 138
From: Orcas Island Wa.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 46Fire
Hi there.

We just acquired a 1946 Ford Fire Engine based on a Ford commercial chassis. Wheelbase is 134", more or less (measured with tape measure). Tires on front are 7.50x20 with HUGE lug nuts; Dual tires on rear. We're trying to locate a chassis repair manual or ANYTHING that will help us to restore this baby. I notice that you're also in Oregon, so perhaps close enough for you to come see it here in Medford Oregon. Here's a web page showing some photos:
1946 Ford Fire Truck

Any help will be appreciated.

Rick
Medford Oregon



Wow! What a beauty! What you need is called 'Ford chassis parts and accessories catalogue'. Here we call it the green bible. Subtitled 'passenger cars 1928-1048, trucks 1928-1947'. Oh, and you aren't planning on re-painting that truck are you?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE