Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

351W must have

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #16  
seefriedm's Avatar
seefriedm
Mountain Pass
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
I would be torn, I've had 400's and rebuilt them for some serious power. On the other hand I had an 89 351w (it was a roller cam engine)and AOD in a 71 Torino convert with 350 gears and it also ran great. So I would guess which ever way you go will be fine, IMHO
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 07:39 AM
  #17  
doug70's Avatar
doug70
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
351W vote

I vote 351W and I am doing that myself. AOD if you want to stay auto.

Doug
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #18  
Blown 331's Avatar
Blown 331
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 3
From: Waterloo IL
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by shortboxd
Sarcasm is hardly necessary....... but thanks anyway for your well thought-out answer. During this era, which you claim to be before or during your youth, there were lemon engines and chassis. This still occurs present day. For the most part, the 335's were reliable; your elder's luck with them hardly typical. I've had no problems with mine, and know plenty of folks that share that experience. Every piston (and turbine) engine has its good and bad points, and once analyzed and addressed, nearly if not all can be made reliable. The M is no different.
Well I appologize for the sarcasm but I doubt all 15 of the trucks my family has bought over a 30 year time frame all had lemon engines.
Combine that with the fact that there are threads on this site almost daily about what to do about bad oil pressure, noise, low compression, low power or whats needed for a 460 swap, it must not just be me. You can use this thread as an example.
Next time you see a thread title mentioning problems such as these I'd bet it's gonna be for a 351m/400, seen it time and time again. I'm not saying a 429/460 or 360/390 can't have problems but its many times more likey that its gonna be a 351m/400.
You obviously like these engines and I don't mean to step on your toes. I'm just stating my opinion and explaining why these engines are not for me.
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #19  
1223's Avatar
1223
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Smile

351/400 sure had a short life span production wise. ford decided to phase them out for a reason right. i guarantee they had good reason to. the windsor surpassed that family of engine, and is known to have a way more efficient oiling system. the M actually stands for Midland. not tryin' to sound rude just my .02
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #20  
occupant's Avatar
occupant
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Westerville, OH
There is no foundry owned by Ford in Midland, Texas. The engines have nothing to do with any incarnation of the word Midland. It's a myth, a lie, an untruth.

Modified is correct because a 351M/400 M-block engine is simply a 351C, modified with a taller deck height. Heads interchange among many other parts. Intakes don't because of the deck height. Michigan is also correct because they were made at the Michigan Casting Center.

But it is most certainly not a Midland. Sore wa Midland sa rete inai. Ich Bin Nein Midlander. No es Midland. Il n'est pas Midland. Het is niet Midland. это не Midland. How many other ways can I explain this?

Anyhow, the 351M and 400 engines are fine. Do they have cracking issues? Yep. Do Windsors have oil pump issues? Yep. Do straight sixes eat timing gears? Yep. Do 460's have cooling problems? Yep. Guess what? You've got a '78 motor. No cylinder wall cracking issues. Just build it up. Tim Meyer (TMI) will hook you up. Spend some time in the 335 engine forum and read about how much fun actually having torque is. You want to spend sick money you can build whatever you want, but you can still remain on a moderate budget and be like Jon Kaase with a 650hp 400. Google that name while you're out and about and check out the 2008 Engine Masters Challenge. And subsequent years because he's still at the top of his game running M-blocks.

Go with a 351W and you'll have to change your motor mounts and transmission or at least get a small-block bellhousing installed. You'll have to make longer wires for your temp sensor. Your exhaust manifolds won't fit. If you change to an AOD you'll need to change the yoke on your driveshaft, mess with the transmission mounts and crossmember, and then figure out which flexplate to use since most AOD's were mounted on 302 engines with the 50oz imbalance. Your Duraspark box may or may not work, you might need one of those or go aftermarket for your ignition purposes. One thing you might not need to mess with is the throttle cable. One of very FEW things you won't have to mess with.

I've been through all this debate with my Gran Torino. I'm either building up my 351M or putting in a late 400 and swapping my tin over. No sense messing with something so good. I can run an AOD, just have to cut the bellhousing off and use an Ultra Bell. I'd much rather spend $325 on a bellhousing and $50 to have a welder cut the old bell off than have to change all the stuff I mentioned in the next paragraph up. Then again if I can get a WHOLE parts car like an 81-83 or so LTD with a 302/AOD, I might go ahead and make the change. If you can get a WHOLE parts truck with a 351W, then yeah, it's worth making the change but you'll miss the grunt on the low end unless you build big.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
m79fordtruck
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Feb 27, 2013 08:33 AM
jeff9942
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Sep 20, 2009 02:18 PM
93fordflareside351
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
9
Apr 7, 2008 08:46 PM
DPW
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Mar 8, 2004 04:27 PM
tm winchester
Performance & General Engine Building
3
Oct 13, 2003 03:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE